Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Forged Performance...A+ once again...481rwhp @ 9psi

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-18-2006, 09:14 AM
  #41  
Sharif@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Performance
iTrader: (92)
 
Sharif@Forged's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 13,733
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Gman2004
Hey Shariff,

When I come up on Friday I'll take two dyno print outs.....Uncorrected and corrrected with an 11% add on. When I get back to Miami I'll hit a local dyno jet. Unlike the countless of times others have said they would do this, I promise to do so and will post up the results.
Sounds like a great idea. Regardless of the results, we'll commit to standard numbers, as I feel like we are giving DJ credit, for trying to emulate their numbers...LOL.
Old 07-18-2006, 09:15 AM
  #42  
Gman2004
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Gman2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 4,328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sharif@Forged
Sounds like a great idea. Regardless of the results, we'll commit to standard numbers, as I feel like we are giving DJ credit, for trying to emulate their numbers...LOL.
I just placed an order on your website. Don't ship the merchandise.
Old 07-18-2006, 05:03 PM
  #43  
Sharif@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Performance
iTrader: (92)
 
Sharif@Forged's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 13,733
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Hi everyone,

We just finished dyno testing an 04 G35 coupe 5AT. Modifications are a JWT pop charger and Stillen full exhaust.
The graph posted is a pure DynoDynamics number, using standard atmospheric correction. No additional correction was added.

I just wanted to post this for reference...not really sure what a typical auto G35 5AT puts down on a DynoJet.

As mentionded, moving forward, we will not add additional correction to our system.
Old 07-18-2006, 06:30 PM
  #44  
Alberto
Cranky FI Owner
iTrader: (14)
 
Alberto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: DMV
Posts: 34,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Thanks for posting this as a "baseline"
Old 07-18-2006, 06:34 PM
  #45  
Peking
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Peking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sharif@Forged
Hi everyone,

We just finished dyno testing an 04 G35 coupe 5AT. Modifications are a JWT pop charger and Stillen full exhaust.
The graph posted is a pure DynoDynamics number, using standard atmospheric correction. No additional correction was added.

I just wanted to post this for reference...not really sure what a typical auto G35 5AT puts down on a DynoJet.

As mentionded, moving forward, we will not add additional correction to our system.

Looks like Brittney needs to some BOOST
Old 07-18-2006, 07:26 PM
  #46  
Bullitproof
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Bullitproof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Wilmington De
Posts: 961
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So what you guys are saying is that if i added 11% to my dynapack numberfor a dynojet adjustment, i'm putting out 480whp with an APS ST? Wowsers!!!!!!
Old 07-19-2006, 02:44 AM
  #47  
002-M-P
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
002-M-P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bullitproof
So what you guys are saying is that if i added 11% to my dynapack numberfor a dynojet adjustment, i'm putting out 480whp with an APS ST? Wowsers!!!!!!
no, dynapack numbers actually tend to read high compared to dynojet while dyno dynamics and mustangdyne tend to read lower than dynojet.
Old 07-19-2006, 03:29 AM
  #48  
gringott
New Member
iTrader: (17)
 
gringott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 3,460
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

That looks like a good baseline, about what I would expect for that car.
Old 07-19-2006, 04:34 AM
  #49  
Alberto
Cranky FI Owner
iTrader: (14)
 
Alberto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: DMV
Posts: 34,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 002-M-P
no, dynapack numbers actually tend to read high compared to dynojet while dyno dynamics and mustangdyne tend to read lower than dynojet.
+1
Old 07-19-2006, 06:04 AM
  #50  
Sharif@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Performance
iTrader: (92)
 
Sharif@Forged's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 13,733
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Peking
Looks like Brittney needs to some BOOST
Yup....she is tempted. I have a TN tuner kit sitting in the inventory cage that she has been spying.
Old 07-19-2006, 10:15 AM
  #51  
002-M-P
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
002-M-P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gringott
That looks like a good baseline, about what I would expect for that car.
I would have thought it would put down a good bit more considering the intake and full exhaust, not sure how much more drivetrain loss an AT has??
Old 07-19-2006, 11:14 AM
  #52  
Bullitproof
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Bullitproof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Wilmington De
Posts: 961
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 002-M-P
no, dynapack numbers actually tend to read high compared to dynojet while dyno dynamics and mustangdyne tend to read lower than dynojet.
Guess I'll know for sure when i hit up a dynojet in about a month.
Old 07-19-2006, 12:05 PM
  #53  
Sharif@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Performance
iTrader: (92)
 
Sharif@Forged's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 13,733
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 002-M-P
I would have thought it would put down a good bit more considering the intake and full exhaust, not sure how much more drivetrain loss an AT has??
The owner had mentioned she put down 222whp on a DynoJet, without the exhaust system...if that helps.

The auto trans tend to be about 10-15whp less than the 6MT
Old 07-19-2006, 12:11 PM
  #54  
Peking
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Peking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sharif@Forged
Yup....she is tempted. I have a TN tuner kit sitting in the inventory cage that she has been spying.
Sweet, and that would be hot... I might have to tell her if she gets boosted I will wash her car in a thong bikini

Oh and please check your PM's

Jonathan
Old 07-19-2006, 12:26 PM
  #55  
002-M-P
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
002-M-P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sharif@Forged
The owner had mentioned she put down 222whp on a DynoJet, without the exhaust system...if that helps.

The auto trans tend to be about 10-15whp less than the 6MT
good to know

Originally Posted by Peking
Sweet, and that would be hot... I might have to tell her if she gets boosted I will wash her car in a thong bikini
Her getting boosted=great
you in a thong bikini=probably not nearly as great, lol
Old 07-19-2006, 04:31 PM
  #56  
Peking
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Peking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 002-M-P
Her getting boosted=great
you in a thong bikini=probably not nearly as great, lol
Hey now, don't knock it till you see it

But yeah your right it won't be as great lol.

Jonathan
Old 07-20-2006, 05:05 PM
  #57  
craigo'sznprgrs
Registered User
iTrader: (35)
 
craigo'sznprgrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,071
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Here is a video of the run, but the quality is not great for some reason, and the sound doesn't come close to giving the car justice.'

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3uzgpyQg2A
Old 07-21-2006, 10:53 AM
  #58  
002-M-P
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
002-M-P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

craig, thanks for posting that. I just got my 2 videos on my computer and will upload them to my website to download this afternoon (probably right about 5pm est). They are better quality, but still do not represent the car very well at all.
Old 07-21-2006, 01:35 PM
  #59  
002-M-P
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
002-M-P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok as promised here are 2 vids of my car....

http://mp-racing.net/481dynorun1.avi (Right-Click and Save As) 11MB

http://mp-racing.net/481dynorun2.avi (Right-Click and Save As) 19MB
Old 07-21-2006, 02:10 PM
  #60  
BrianLG35C
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
BrianLG35C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nice runs! Man that 3" SVRTech exhaust is loud. Not to hijack this thread but Sharif since you've been tuning so much now, you've probably heard all the 3" exhausts out there (SVRTech/APS/AAM/SFR), which seems to be the quietest in your opinion?


Quick Reply: Forged Performance...A+ once again...481rwhp @ 9psi



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:39 PM.