Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

729whp Greddy TT / UTEC G35

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 07:12 PM
  #61  
Carlitos's Avatar
Carlitos
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: Puerto Rico
Default

Originally Posted by turismo
What fuel system are you running?
custom intank twin walbro set up match to CJ's stage II and RC 750cc
(pics on my album) it was a temp fix but it has been in use since last summer w/o problems waiting for Charles to finish his twin pump setup.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 07:17 PM
  #62  
Carlitos's Avatar
Carlitos
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: Puerto Rico
Default

Originally Posted by Alberto
then towards the end of this drag season I'll make it out to destroy tranny #4
I hear you, I also have 3 in the bag but what really kills me is the 7 broken axles to include a set of level 5 that are getting the 5.9 upgrade as we speak
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2007 | 06:02 AM
  #63  
Alberto's Avatar
Alberto
Cranky FI Owner
Premier Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 34,715
Likes: 8
From: DMV
Default

Originally Posted by Carlitos
Alberto, I don't tune my car, Miguel Alcrudo Jr from Auto Plaza Tuners(local Subaru dealer) does. He is the same guy that tunes the EDO Performance- Zero/Sport STI http://www.dragsport.com/issue/2007/...er_story.shtml and many other Subys here in PR.
I know that he keeps the A/F in the 10s for n2o and in the 11s for vp. He also pulls some timing for n2o but is not much, 2-3 degrees at the most.
My last dyno day took a lot more effort than the previous one because we went from 3" free flow exh to a 2.5 exhaust with resonators for noise comfort (its a G,not a race car)
Thanks for the info Carlitos!
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2007 | 06:07 AM
  #64  
Fluid1's Avatar
Fluid1
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 11,953
Likes: 0
From: NOPE NOPE NOPE
Default

I'm surprised that the 100 shot of N2O only provided 36 wtq. The powerband on the non-n2o run looks much better overall.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2007 | 04:31 PM
  #65  
Carlitos's Avatar
Carlitos
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: Puerto Rico
Default

Originally Posted by Fluid1
I'm surprised that the 100 shot of N2O only provided 36 wtq. The powerband on the non-n2o run looks much better overall.
Are u looking at the new(749hp/650tq) run?
I think you're looking at the one from Aug06(729hp/626tq), on the Mar07 run, tq is 54lbs more than non-n2o (650tq n2o vs 596tq non-n2o) and the run looks alot better not to mention how the car feels on the road (buttdyno)

I know torque is good however over 600lbs of tq on a street car like my G = wheel spin, burn clutches, and broken axles.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sales@czp
Engine
33
Sep 23, 2019 03:30 PM
2ndchanceZ
Engine
1
Oct 26, 2015 08:03 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:58 PM.