Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Dyno graphs from 3 shops.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-20-2006 | 09:09 PM
  #41  
EM-EFER's Avatar
EM-EFER
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
From: King of Materbation
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
Exactly. The tq curve is clearly the one dropping a lot at the end. And the scale for tq is on the right and is not the same scale as the hp on the left. On a side note does anyone know what turbo the BB530 really is. From pics and rating by Jim Wolf it looks like a GT2554. Is it really that small. Its either a 2554 or a 2854..
2554 but has an upgraded compressor I believe. To what? No one knows nor can answer that question.
Old 11-21-2006 | 03:46 AM
  #42  
captj3's Avatar
captj3
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 0
From: Boynton Bch FL
Default

Originally Posted by redman333
JWT kit

Your post got in a head of mine. Look at the post times.
Old 11-21-2006 | 05:00 AM
  #43  
350zDCalb's Avatar
350zDCalb
Sponsor
builtZmotors
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,780
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque, NM
Default

Originally Posted by USN HM 350Z
boost controller as stated in post #3. It would not hold any boost. that dyno was in 2005, controller was removed the next day and a manual installed.
even if the boost controller was shut off completely...150hp at 6000rpm is less than a stock NA vq35 motor... how is that possible? that dyno must be on crack..or they let off way early
Old 11-21-2006 | 06:02 AM
  #44  
roneski's Avatar
roneski
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
From: Vegas
Default

Originally Posted by 350zDCalb
even if the boost controller was shut off completely...150hp at 6000rpm is less than a stock NA vq35 motor... how is that possible? that dyno must be on crack..or they let off way early
You're still measuring the torque plot to the HP scale. On the first graph it's making ~ 325 ft/lbs of torque and 375 hp at 6000 rpms.
Old 11-21-2006 | 06:57 AM
  #45  
Sharif@Forged's Avatar
Sharif@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Performance
iTrader: (92)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 13,733
Likes: 1
From: Marietta, GA
Default

Yeah, the scale is what threw me. It looks like the trq is dropping off radically, but its just the scaling on the chart. It always makes for a prettier chart if the scales on both axis's are identical.
Old 11-21-2006 | 11:16 AM
  #46  
350zDCalb's Avatar
350zDCalb
Sponsor
builtZmotors
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,780
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque, NM
Default

Originally Posted by roneski
You're still measuring the torque plot to the HP scale. On the first graph it's making ~ 325 ft/lbs of torque and 375 hp at 6000 rpms.

oh i see...looked at it too quickly..not the smartest design by the dyno co.
Old 11-21-2006 | 11:27 AM
  #47  
WA2GOOD's Avatar
WA2GOOD
Banned
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,474
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

Old 11-21-2006 | 11:59 AM
  #48  
redman333's Avatar
redman333
New Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,480
Likes: 1
From: Fayetteville, NC
Default

Hey, I have a utec already and am having vrt do a bottom end build and a JWT kit soon. I saw that you said the split second isn't as good as the utec, should I just keep my utec then.
Old 11-21-2006 | 12:11 PM
  #49  
Mike Wazowski's Avatar
Mike Wazowski
Thread Starter
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (113)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 22,096
Likes: 1
From: San Diego 92111
Default

Utec is just something I wanna go with. It is by no means required. I just wanna try something new.
Old 11-21-2006 | 12:18 PM
  #50  
Gman2004's Avatar
Gman2004
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,328
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Default

Originally Posted by redman333
Hey, I have a utec already and am having vrt do a bottom end build and a JWT kit soon. I saw that you said the split second isn't as good as the utec, should I just keep my utec then.
where you even considering going from the UTEC to the SS box?
Old 11-21-2006 | 02:29 PM
  #51  
TurboTim's Avatar
TurboTim
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

Originally Posted by USN HM 350Z
actually there is timing being pulled up top. It was tuned down right before I left for Virginia right after my build.

Im going to be looking around to get retuned in the near future. Also looking to dump the SS and go to a Utec.

Anyone you would recommend in SoCal Julian?

SFR, ofcourse. We can tune your Utec for you.We can pretty much tune anything
Old 11-21-2006 | 02:36 PM
  #52  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by TurboTim
SFR, ofcourse. We can tune your Utec for you.We can pretty much tune anything
Really Tim? Can you come tune my universal remote to work with my DVD player On a serious note Speed Force Racing does some good work. I'd talk to them about the Utec tuning.
Old 11-21-2006 | 02:47 PM
  #53  
Mike Wazowski's Avatar
Mike Wazowski
Thread Starter
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (113)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 22,096
Likes: 1
From: San Diego 92111
Default

I need to get a bigger exhaust before I do anything LOL
Old 11-21-2006 | 03:01 PM
  #54  
redman333's Avatar
redman333
New Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,480
Likes: 1
From: Fayetteville, NC
Default

Originally Posted by Gman2004
where you even considering going from the UTEC to the SS box?
Yeah, I was originally thinking about it cause I know its all in one kit and then I can just sell the utec and buy more parts for my car.
Old 11-21-2006 | 03:14 PM
  #55  
Mike Wazowski's Avatar
Mike Wazowski
Thread Starter
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (113)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 22,096
Likes: 1
From: San Diego 92111
Default

well, if you decide to sell, let me know and maybe we can work something out.
Old 11-21-2006 | 10:34 PM
  #56  
mraturbo's Avatar
mraturbo
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
From: SAN DIEGO
Default

Originally Posted by USN HM 350Z
I need to get a bigger exhaust before I do anything LOL
700s are a better upgrade.

These are nice numbers, yet the 700s are nicer.

Let me know John. Cool you have so many dynos on the car.

M
Old 11-22-2006 | 06:01 PM
  #57  
GMZ's Avatar
GMZ
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,896
Likes: 0
From: Cali Expatriate
Default

Ahh, I see you are in San Diego now John. Punk. It is cold and rainy here!
Old 11-22-2006 | 06:24 PM
  #58  
Mike Wazowski's Avatar
Mike Wazowski
Thread Starter
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (113)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 22,096
Likes: 1
From: San Diego 92111
Default

Originally Posted by GMZ
Ahh, I see you are in San Diego now John. Punk. It is cold and rainy here!
it was 94 here on Monday
Old 11-22-2006 | 06:46 PM
  #59  
mraturbo's Avatar
mraturbo
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
From: SAN DIEGO
Default

Sweet.

M
Old 12-19-2006 | 10:55 AM
  #60  
Julian@MRC's Avatar
Julian@MRC
Banned
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,510
Likes: 0
From: Spotswood NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Sharif@Forged
Yeah, the scale is what threw me. It looks like the trq is dropping off radically, but its just the scaling on the chart. It always makes for a prettier chart if the scales on both axis's are identical.
The scaling still does not change the fact that at 1500rpms, his TQ is near 150, then at 3700 rpms he hits peak TQ of 503, then falls back off to near 150 ft lbs again at 6000 rpms. So basicaly the TQ rises and falls over 350% in 2000 rpms, then falls another 350% in another 3500 rpms. Not to mention all of the JWT dynos I have seen have somehow magically changes the peak tq the motor produces from 4800rpms to 3700 rpms..Am I the only one that finds this odd??


Quick Reply: Dyno graphs from 3 shops.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:23 PM.