Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

I'm back. 420Ztt

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-09-2007, 07:36 AM
  #61  
Zivman
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Zivman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Posts: 7,179
Received 27 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Just a thought, but increased stroke and displacement may put the motor at higher fuel demand than the fuel system, or more specifically, the injectors were rated for? I know finding bigger injectors that physically fit, might be a challenge, but I definitely think it is doable and and easy fix for higher HP.

Either way, uppper 600's is an insane amount of power.
Old 02-09-2007, 07:43 AM
  #62  
dutchboy
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
dutchboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Holland,MI
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Zivman
Just a thought, but increased stroke and displacement may put the motor at higher fuel demand than the fuel system, or more specifically, the injectors were rated for?
I would think that would be the case since that motor flows so much more air.
Old 02-09-2007, 07:59 AM
  #63  
XM 1
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
XM 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,535
Received 33 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

hey alex
i found this on the web
http://www.houston-imports.com/index...d=62&Itemid=35

maybe it could help you...they say they used !!1600cc fuel injectors!!
on that stroker kit.
maybe you contact them??????

btw sick output
Old 02-09-2007, 08:08 AM
  #64  
captj3
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
captj3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Boynton Bch FL
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A while back I think phunk posted a place to get injectors similar to the aps ones that come with there regular kit. They may have larger ones that will fit the xtreme fuel system. I have to agree with zivman, with the increase in displacement and stroke the fuel system was designed for a built stock motor. I guess only time will tell.
Old 02-09-2007, 08:40 AM
  #65  
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Escondido
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by captj3
A while back I think phunk posted a place to get injectors similar to the aps ones that come with there regular kit. They may have larger ones that will fit the xtreme fuel system. I have to agree with zivman, with the increase in displacement and stroke the fuel system was designed for a built stock motor. I guess only time will tell.
Increased displacement doesn't make a 880cc injector a 660cc injector. APS over promised and under delivered on this fuel system. It shouldn't be a surprise. phunk has been saying that since the first one got shipped.
Old 02-09-2007, 08:45 AM
  #66  
Zivman
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Zivman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Posts: 7,179
Received 27 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
Increased displacement doesn't make a 880cc injector a 660cc injector. APS over promised and under delivered on this fuel system. It shouldn't be a surprise. phunk has been saying that since the first one got shipped.
APS rates injectors at 4 bar, so at their rating, they are 880cc
Old 02-09-2007, 08:50 AM
  #67  
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Escondido
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Zivman
APS rates injectors at 4 bar, so at their rating, they are 880cc
And apparentely its ok for APS to use the non-industry standard rating for injectors to make their injectors and in the end fuel system sound more capable then it is? Does increasing displacement less then half a liter move a fuel systems max potential down 200 Crank HP? I don't think so but perhaps phunk could weigh in on that. It doesn't appear that phunks fuel system loses any max potential on a larger displacement motor.
Old 02-09-2007, 08:50 AM
  #68  
bigbri
Registered User
 
bigbri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: CALI
Posts: 2,059
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Good **** brotha!!!! If I were to do it all over again, I'd have your exact setup, Sam and GTM is the only Z place to go on the west coast. Be carful I know you used to the PRIUS, drive the thing for a while at this power level and plan on getting a better fuel system later on for HUGE #'s. But 802 crank hp and 757 crank hp is crazy power.
Old 02-09-2007, 08:55 AM
  #69  
drsifu
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
drsifu's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Oceanside
Posts: 934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

:respect:
Old 02-09-2007, 08:58 AM
  #70  
Zivman
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Zivman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Posts: 7,179
Received 27 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
And apparentely its ok for APS to use the non-industry standard rating for injectors to make their injectors and in the end fuel system sound more capable then it is? Does increasing displacement less then half a liter move a fuel systems max potential down 200 Crank HP? I don't think so but perhaps phunk could weigh in on that. It doesn't appear that phunks fuel system loses any max potential on a larger displacement motor.

just curious how you did your math

oem displacment = 3.5
stroker = 4.24
difference = .74 litres = 21.1% increase

As far as I am concerned >20% is pretty significant.

APS is fairly open about how they rate their injectors. US spec is 3.5 bar, while APS has rated their injectors at 4 bar since they brought us their original kit.

Argue with me until you are blue in the face if you like, but a larger set of injectors is all that is needed. To say the fuel system is a bust because it doesn't support what APS claims on a motor that is stroked and has over 20% more displacement doesn't give you much to stand on
Old 02-09-2007, 09:01 AM
  #71  
CEO350Z
That's bad juju
iTrader: (21)
 
CEO350Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Project Hollywood...PUAs UNITE
Posts: 3,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

when you get her back, we're gonna have to run!!! your 4.2 vs my 3.5. 660+ whp vs 230 whp.


two words:

Bring it........


you're nuts and i am too for hanging with ya
Old 02-09-2007, 09:09 AM
  #72  
Sharif@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Performance
iTrader: (92)
 
Sharif@Forged's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 13,733
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

A larger set of injectors will help somewhat. But one problem remains. APS uses a non adjustable fuel pressure regulator. Ideally, you should swap out to adjustable regs, and reduce fuel pressure to 45psi. Reduced fuel pressure means more fuel flow at high boost (fuel pressure and fuel flow are inversely proporational), and run a larger injector at a lower duty cycle.

The other issue I see, is the small return line opening. This will probably result in fuel pressure, that cannot be lowered sufficiently. Only time will tell. We'll be trying the APS fuel system on two APS Extreme cars with standard 3.5 bores. We'll advise if things are different in the non-stroker world.
Old 02-09-2007, 09:11 AM
  #73  
Changvi
New Member
iTrader: (66)
 
Changvi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 3,453
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Welcome back Alex. I'm glad that you made the right decision dispite the problems you've encountered with your motor. By the way, if you ever need us, you know who to call.... Can't wait to see your ride next weekend man.
Old 02-09-2007, 09:11 AM
  #74  
bbs350z
Registered User
iTrader: (85)
 
bbs350z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Scottsdale AZ
Posts: 6,662
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

ams runs 1600cc injectors in there evo, they also run 8 injectors tho. u can prolly pick them up from rc maybe?? is your z daily driven??
Old 02-09-2007, 09:12 AM
  #75  
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Escondido
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Zivman
just curious how you did your math

oem displacment = 3.5
stroker = 4.24
difference = .74 litres = 21.1% increase

As far as I am concerned >20% is pretty significant.

APS is fairly open about how they rate their injectors. US spec is 3.5 bar, while APS has rated their injectors at 4 bar since they brought us their original kit.

Argue with me until you are blue in the face if you like, but a larger set of injectors is all that is needed. To say the fuel system is a bust because it doesn't support what APS claims on a motor that is stroked and has over 20% more displacement doesn't give you much to stand on
My reference to displacement was above 3.8L which is almost standard for built motors these days. APS claims
Originally Posted by APS
advanced fuel system that is designed to operate at very high boost referenced fuel flow rates - but with plenty of reserve capacity to accommodate the variety of tuning strategies demanded by experienced turbocharged engine tuners around the planet.
Doesn't sound like it has ANY reserve capacity to accomodate anything other then APS tuning strategy. I sincerely hope you don't believe 14 PSI from a GT30xx turbo is "very high boost".
Originally Posted by APS
the ultimate in fuel system performance on extreme horsepower VQ35 engines.
Guess not...
Old 02-09-2007, 09:22 AM
  #76  
Nitrouz
Back to Z
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
Nitrouz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 6,626
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Thanks for all the kind words everyone.

Yes we have already discussed that the stroker may be the reason why we're maxing out the injectors, but with non-rising fuel pressure, it's hard to get even more out of the 660cc.

Anyways now that I've maxed out the injectors, my next goal is to max out these turbos...... It's not about what I can put down to the pavement anymore, as I know it's pretty much impossible with even 680rwhp. It's mostly about how far I can push the VQ now in regards to power.
Old 02-09-2007, 09:43 AM
  #77  
jimmyloose
Registered User
iTrader: (22)
 
jimmyloose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Irvine
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Out of your mind, but we love it.
Old 02-09-2007, 09:56 AM
  #78  
TayTaythatsme04
Registered User
iTrader: (68)
 
TayTaythatsme04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Oceanside, CA
Posts: 2,443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

we need vids

T
Old 02-09-2007, 09:58 AM
  #79  
r0mey
350Z-holic
iTrader: (35)
 
r0mey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Morristown, NJ
Posts: 17,785
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

hey big boy can i go for a ride =D
Old 02-09-2007, 10:08 AM
  #80  
Volk350Z
Master
iTrader: (65)
 
Volk350Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,527
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

lol nice.. Finally get to see it in 2 weeks..


Quick Reply: I'm back. 420Ztt



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:27 PM.