JWT TT + TP or HFC?
I have the UTR test pipes with mine, not loud at all. The spool up is about 300RPM's faster with them then the stock cats. You will have a fuel smell though, but that is just how it goes.
i picked up a duel 2.5" exhaust with metallic 300 cell HFC from FastIntentions in preparation for going with the JWT TT kit at the end of the year...
www.fastintentions.com - give Tony a call - top quality, great customer service - some reviews over at g35driver.com
www.fastintentions.com - give Tony a call - top quality, great customer service - some reviews over at g35driver.com
Originally Posted by PalFX
Hello,
Just upgraded to JWT TT not long ago and now I would like to either go with hi-flo cats or test pipes. I would like the most power while least sound and smell increase. I tried the R/T and Crawford high-flow cats back when was N/A and they worked okay but the problem is that I'm told that I should use metal cell cats with the TT or they wouldn't last long or they might even blow chunks of their insides into the Fuji muffler.
Would test pipes such as the Stillen or the UTR resonated cause it to sound much louder or/and produce unwanted unburnt fuel smell with the TT's? If so, what are good HFC for the JWT kit? Lastly, how much of a difference would there be between the TP or HFC with the JWT kit?
I searched and couldn't find good answers.
TIA for the help.
Just upgraded to JWT TT not long ago and now I would like to either go with hi-flo cats or test pipes. I would like the most power while least sound and smell increase. I tried the R/T and Crawford high-flow cats back when was N/A and they worked okay but the problem is that I'm told that I should use metal cell cats with the TT or they wouldn't last long or they might even blow chunks of their insides into the Fuji muffler.
Would test pipes such as the Stillen or the UTR resonated cause it to sound much louder or/and produce unwanted unburnt fuel smell with the TT's? If so, what are good HFC for the JWT kit? Lastly, how much of a difference would there be between the TP or HFC with the JWT kit?
I searched and couldn't find good answers.
TIA for the help.
Just remember, your turbos want free flow when it comes to exhaust and putting a set of cats, even HFC, is not optimal
Originally Posted by PalFX
Thanks all for the help. I made plans with Fast Intentions to get the 300 cell metallic HFC installed tomorrow. I hope I made the right choice 4me.
UTR resonated or the Stillen down/test pipes were very close 2nd.
UTR resonated or the Stillen down/test pipes were very close 2nd.
If you have spent the money on a TT setup, why choke it with cats?
Because you care a little about being legal, and about the environment. Thats one reason.
Get high flow cats. They flow almost as well as test pipes, and have the benefit of being legal and actually cleaning up the air a little bit.
Get high flow cats. They flow almost as well as test pipes, and have the benefit of being legal and actually cleaning up the air a little bit.
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by Dave 90TT
Because you care a little about being legal, and about the environment. Thats one reason.
Get high flow cats. They flow almost as well as test pipes, and have the benefit of being legal and actually cleaning up the air a little bit.
Get high flow cats. They flow almost as well as test pipes, and have the benefit of being legal and actually cleaning up the air a little bit.
The reduced power and increased thermal load on my motor would be bigger concerns if it were my car.
Just an FYI, on a turbo setup, resonated test pipes are not needed. A plain set of the new Helix or 2.5" APS pipes for about 200 bucks will do very nicely.
Last edited by Zivman; Mar 2, 2007 at 06:20 AM.
I just used random tech hi-flow cats, were I live they full you over and check for test pipes $$, plus the gas smell was not appealing. Random tech cats are supposed to flow very good compared with straight pipe though not equal.
Originally Posted by clemlover15
I just used random tech hi-flow cats, were I live they full you over and check for test pipes $$, plus the gas smell was not appealing. Random tech cats are supposed to flow very good compared with straight pipe though not equal.
Don't those random tech cats have a horrible rep for collapsing? With the increased exhaust temps I would think it would increase the likelyhood of this happening. If I lived in an area that required annual inspections I would just reinstal the oem cats for inspection. Swapping test pipes and cats can be done in less than 30 minutes
Regular cheapo test pipes are the way to go for a TT setup
Originally Posted by USN HM 350Z
I have the UTR test pipes with mine, not loud at all. The spool up is about 300RPM's faster with them then the stock cats. You will have a fuel smell though, but that is just how it goes.
The last thing I need now is back pressure; as my turbos do that just fine.
I have been looking at 3" options, but they tend to be too huge to fit snugly; maybe a 2.75" may work' don't know still looking.
G
_______________________________
Originally Posted by 350Zzzz
Turbos are in fact exhaust mufflers. My Ingen was louder with the supercharger than with the JWTs. But I need to change my Injen, as I am sure they are causing mucho resistance to my present set up. I presently have PE high flow cats.
The last thing I need now is back pressure; as my turbos do that just fine.
I have been looking at 3" options, but they tend to be too huge to fit snugly; maybe a 2.75" may work' don't know still looking.
G
_______________________________

The last thing I need now is back pressure; as my turbos do that just fine.
I have been looking at 3" options, but they tend to be too huge to fit snugly; maybe a 2.75" may work' don't know still looking.
G
_______________________________

I strongly sugest the EVO TT set up... I have the AAM set up as you know. And I might be switching to the EVO TT as well. Or I might have Mike fab up a new mid section... The AAM is real tight, and bottoms out in the middle, on a lowered car.
If you need 3" then the AAM is the least noisy of the three available.
Last edited by 1G-350Z; Mar 3, 2007 at 03:33 PM.
Originally Posted by 1G-350Z
G-man
I strongly sugest the EVO TT set up... I have the AAM set up as you know. And I might be switching to the EVO TT as well. Or I might have Mike fab up a new mid section... The AAM is real tight, and bottoms out in the middle, on a lowered car.
If you need 3" then the AAM is the least noisy of the three available.
I strongly sugest the EVO TT set up... I have the AAM set up as you know. And I might be switching to the EVO TT as well. Or I might have Mike fab up a new mid section... The AAM is real tight, and bottoms out in the middle, on a lowered car.
If you need 3" then the AAM is the least noisy of the three available.
so how much horsepower would actually be gained over HFC's on a turbo setup with Test pipes? And does the smell stay in your car even after you turn it off (like in the carpeting)?
Originally Posted by danielwebb
so how much horsepower would actually be gained over HFC's on a turbo setup with Test pipes? And does the smell stay in your car even after you turn it off (like in the carpeting)?
Just my 2 cents
Environmental concerns are legitimate as well as the nasty fuel vapor smell. And fuel vapor sticks to clothing, hair, skin. Yuck. The intensity of the smell depends on how rich you run, granted. I will sacrifice 20 whp for a clean smelling car! Get 3" HFCs if you want.
For those of you that think that cats do nothing for the environment, think again. The "cats" catalyze the following chemical reactions:
Reduction of nitrogen oxides to nitrogen and oxygen: 2NOx → xO2 + N2
Oxidation of (non greenhouse gas, but toxic) carbon monoxide to less harmful (greenhouse gas) carbon dioxide: 2CO + O2 → 2CO2
Oxidation of unburnt carcinogenic hydrocarbons (HC) to carbon dioxide and water: 2CxHy + (2x+y/2)O2 → 2xCO2 + yH2O
By the way, "carcinogenic" = "promotes cancer".
For those of you that think that cats do nothing for the environment, think again. The "cats" catalyze the following chemical reactions:
Reduction of nitrogen oxides to nitrogen and oxygen: 2NOx → xO2 + N2
Oxidation of (non greenhouse gas, but toxic) carbon monoxide to less harmful (greenhouse gas) carbon dioxide: 2CO + O2 → 2CO2
Oxidation of unburnt carcinogenic hydrocarbons (HC) to carbon dioxide and water: 2CxHy + (2x+y/2)O2 → 2xCO2 + yH2O
By the way, "carcinogenic" = "promotes cancer".
Originally Posted by rcdash
Environmental concerns are legitimate as well as the nasty fuel vapor smell. And fuel vapor sticks to clothing, hair, skin. Yuck. The intensity of the smell depends on how rich you run, granted. I will sacrifice 20 whp for a clean smelling car! Get 3" HFCs if you want.
For those of you that think that cats do nothing for the environment, think again. The "cats" catalyze the following chemical reactions:
Reduction of nitrogen oxides to nitrogen and oxygen: 2NOx → xO2 + N2
Oxidation of (non greenhouse gas, but toxic) carbon monoxide to less harmful (greenhouse gas) carbon dioxide: 2CO + O2 → 2CO2
Oxidation of unburnt carcinogenic hydrocarbons (HC) to carbon dioxide and water: 2CxHy + (2x+y/2)O2 → 2xCO2 + yH2O
By the way, "carcinogenic" = "promotes cancer".
For those of you that think that cats do nothing for the environment, think again. The "cats" catalyze the following chemical reactions:
Reduction of nitrogen oxides to nitrogen and oxygen: 2NOx → xO2 + N2
Oxidation of (non greenhouse gas, but toxic) carbon monoxide to less harmful (greenhouse gas) carbon dioxide: 2CO + O2 → 2CO2
Oxidation of unburnt carcinogenic hydrocarbons (HC) to carbon dioxide and water: 2CxHy + (2x+y/2)O2 → 2xCO2 + yH2O
By the way, "carcinogenic" = "promotes cancer".



