First test with the Vortech cog system
#21
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,500
Likes: 1
From: council bluffs Ia.
Originally Posted by sentry65
looks good booger! We'll all be curious to see what the final numbers end up at.
This kinda makes me more inclined to stick with the normal blower since I'd like to be able to rev to around 7000-7500 rpms with a built block - or at least have the headroom to do so. The T-trim sounds like it'd make 30 psi at 7500 rpms which is uh well a lot
The Haltech sounds like a great product, but seems like the first versions of these sorta things always have a million bugs
the Fcon has been around and been worked out for awhile now
This kinda makes me more inclined to stick with the normal blower since I'd like to be able to rev to around 7000-7500 rpms with a built block - or at least have the headroom to do so. The T-trim sounds like it'd make 30 psi at 7500 rpms which is uh well a lot
The Haltech sounds like a great product, but seems like the first versions of these sorta things always have a million bugs
the Fcon has been around and been worked out for awhile now
#22
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,500
Likes: 1
From: council bluffs Ia.
Originally Posted by THE TECH
Is that rod on the jackshaft there to help prevent the premature wear on the jackshaft?
#23
Originally Posted by booger
thanks Mia...I'll look into it . But if its only in MAF instead of MAP.....dont know .
Originally Posted by Haltech
Tuning via TPS with Manifold pressure correction
#24
Originally Posted by sentry65
looks good booger! We'll all be curious to see what the final numbers end up at.
This kinda makes me more inclined to stick with the normal blower since I'd like to be able to rev to around 7000-7500 rpms with a built block - or at least have the headroom to do so. The T-trim sounds like it'd make 30 psi at 7500 rpms which is uh well a lot
The Haltech sounds like a great product, but seems like the first versions of these sorta things always have a million bugs
the Fcon has been around and been worked out for awhile now
This kinda makes me more inclined to stick with the normal blower since I'd like to be able to rev to around 7000-7500 rpms with a built block - or at least have the headroom to do so. The T-trim sounds like it'd make 30 psi at 7500 rpms which is uh well a lot
The Haltech sounds like a great product, but seems like the first versions of these sorta things always have a million bugs
the Fcon has been around and been worked out for awhile now
#27
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,500
Likes: 1
From: council bluffs Ia.
Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
Haltech has been making ECUs for years now for Nissans, Mazdas, etc. The RX-7 guys are very happy with them and some Spec V guys have started using them as well. Like I said before Danzio out here in Socal got it running the cam timing. Link to that: http://danzioperformance.com/customer_cars_16.asp
The one thing I see with a stand alone is that they will all have the same problem as the Hydra is having . Controling the AT5 tranny . And until all of them work through that , guys with the AT5 are left out of using the stand alone EMS .
Right now.....and after sitting and thinking for a day . I have more important thnigs to get paid off right now . So it may have to wait longer than I really want it to anyway . So maybe some one will work through controlling the tranny in the mean time .
#31
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,500
Likes: 1
From: council bluffs Ia.
Originally Posted by Audible Mayhem
Nice Booger!!
i never thought i would use that phrase in my life, seriously though, just get a utec and you will be fine with your EMU problems.
are you on a built block (i hope)
i never thought i would use that phrase in my life, seriously though, just get a utec and you will be fine with your EMU problems.
are you on a built block (i hope)
LOL
Built block...wouldnt even think about it with out .
+1
Good work Booger!
Post pics!
In the first post Hydrazine
#32
Is the T-trim the same style impeller as the standard trim headunit with slighlty different dimensions? I noticed that their impeller design on the standard trim could be improved slightly for some increased airflow something along the lines of 10-15% more CFM. Just wondering if the same goes for the T-trim?
#33
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,500
Likes: 1
From: council bluffs Ia.
Originally Posted by Quamen
Is the T-trim the same style impeller as the standard trim headunit with slighlty different dimensions? I noticed that their impeller design on the standard trim could be improved slightly for some increased airflow something along the lines of 10-15% more CFM. Just wondering if the same goes for the T-trim?
I think if you saw a standard blower with a cog set up . You would see it make more boost than it does with a serp belt . I believe Vortechs web site say the the standard blower can make 20psi and the T-trim 24 or 26psi...not exactly sure on both
#36
Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
He reported gains of 20+ WHP across the band just by messing with the cam timing.
I would expect to see a 20whp gain from 2500-4000RPM though with proper tuning.
#37
Originally Posted by KPierson
It would be very interesting to see some graphs to back up that report. From my recent research I don't think any tweaking of VVT will add any HP above 4000RPM. At that point the timing is as aggresive as it will go, so I'm not sure how you would squeeze out more power.
I would expect to see a 20whp gain from 2500-4000RPM though with proper tuning.
I would expect to see a 20whp gain from 2500-4000RPM though with proper tuning.
let me know your research so i can figure out some stuff...
#38
From what I have seen you are better off leaving it alone.
The valve timing at idle is roughly 2 degrees from the crank. If you supply constant power it will go all the way to 40 degrees or so, and the car won't idle very well (mine actually stalls). You will also lose top end power.
If you disconnect it all together I believe you will drop midrange torque, but will keep your power up top. Once I get my new spark plugs installed I'll be back on the dyno to confirm this. My last test didn't do what it was supposed to do.
Sorry for OTing!
The valve timing at idle is roughly 2 degrees from the crank. If you supply constant power it will go all the way to 40 degrees or so, and the car won't idle very well (mine actually stalls). You will also lose top end power.
If you disconnect it all together I believe you will drop midrange torque, but will keep your power up top. Once I get my new spark plugs installed I'll be back on the dyno to confirm this. My last test didn't do what it was supposed to do.
Sorry for OTing!
#40
Originally Posted by KPierson
It would be very interesting to see some graphs to back up that report. From my recent research I don't think any tweaking of VVT will add any HP above 4000RPM. At that point the timing is as aggresive as it will go, so I'm not sure how you would squeeze out more power.
I would expect to see a 20whp gain from 2500-4000RPM though with proper tuning.
I would expect to see a 20whp gain from 2500-4000RPM though with proper tuning.