so you guys make jokes about the RSX.. this and that.. blah blah blah
Originally Posted by illjim69
if i am incorrect or not, it has NO bearing on me being an elitist. look it up. at no point did i make myself seem better than anyone.
they ran 14s by taking stuff out of the car. and either way, you cant tell me that the 4th gen was faster than the 5.5 gen.
255hp > 190hp
jim
they ran 14s by taking stuff out of the car. and either way, you cant tell me that the 4th gen was faster than the 5.5 gen.
255hp > 190hp
jim
Originally Posted by robattire
fwd<rwd.
That rsx has alot of power but look at the lag there is no power untill u are at 5000rpm. Thats alot of lag! Personally i wouldnt think of this car as verys streetable its just a car to brag about, maybe do some drag racing in. there isnt enough low end for it to be fun enough, well for me personally
That rsx has alot of power but look at the lag there is no power untill u are at 5000rpm. Thats alot of lag! Personally i wouldnt think of this car as verys streetable its just a car to brag about, maybe do some drag racing in. there isnt enough low end for it to be fun enough, well for me personally
Originally Posted by doug
4th Gen's with 5.5 Gen motors are smoking 5th Gen's all day long.
Originally Posted by doug
you are giving the impression that because you had a 5.5th Gen you are better than all 4th Gen owners
jim
Registered User
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,038
Likes: 0
From: Winfield, IL
Originally Posted by illjim69
no, all i am saying is, the 5.5 was simply a faster car, thats it. but i am also saying that the 5.5 is faster than the 6th gen. so it isn't like i am saying because my 02 was newer than a 97, it's better. newer doesn't always mean better.
jim
The 5.5gen is definitely faster than the 4th gen is without a doubt, but guys have run low 14s in 5.5 gens stock and mid-high 14s in 4th gens stock. Anyone who says otherwise is just plain wrong. I've done it in three different cars (14.87@93 my first time ever at the track in my 96, 14.51 @ 94.5 in my 95, and 14.88 @ 93 in my old buddy Jaime's 4th gen who by the way was also stuck in the 15s like most people are.) The only weight reduction any of those cars had was removed spare tire and jack from the trunk.
BTW magazine writers are not professional drivers, they are professional writers who write about cars and drive them for a day or two. Anyone who doesn't believe that people run faster in all sorts of cars than the magazine times is also just plain wrong.
Last edited by Nealoc187; Jul 4, 2007 at 08:44 AM.
Why don't you go to SAR with me on the 11th. So far all I have is a guy from work in a Subaru. All the Austin Z guys are just standing next to their car with a can of wax in their hand. Yeah I know it's a Wednesday, you wanna race or wait in line for hours. Call in sick or take a vacation day.
Originally Posted by zzerotwosixty
Why don't you go to SAR with me on the 11th. So far all I have is a guy from work in a Subaru. All the Austin Z guys are just standing next to their car with a can of wax in their hand. Yeah I know it's a Wednesday, you wanna race or wait in line for hours. Call in sick or take a vacation day.
holy shieet who is that girl?!?!??!?!
Originally Posted by solidsnake
check this one out... nice...but, it's still a Yugo...
http://youtube.com/watch?v=UI8L7Ep48LI
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
From: USA
Originally Posted by Alberto
No excuse for an NA car with decent camber on 275 KDW2's to not hook 1.9-2.0 60ft's....
