Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

APS did it again! Z06 Twin Turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 1, 2007 | 06:52 PM
  #81  
nismology1's Avatar
nismology1
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 332
Likes: 1
From: South Fla.
Default

Just for the record, I'm an import guy. Always have and always will be. But I give credit where credit is due. GM really made a great motor. Anyone who thinks otherwise is just hard-headed or hasn't read up on the technology that it employs.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2007 | 06:52 PM
  #82  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by miamimax96
http://www.corvettemuseum.com/specs/2006/LS7.shtml

Please read. Seriously. Namely the cylinder head section.
yeah i read that a year and a half or so ago

I fixed my post 5 min ago to add exhaust too - meaning the exhaust AND headers etc
oooo a slightly larger throttle body - didn't know that, I'm sure that's a major factor in the powerband shift right there



A unique hydraulic roller camshaft actuates the large valves, giving them the time needed to bring in the air/fuel mixture and clear out the exhaust from the LS7's large air passages. Based on C5R racing experience, the LS7's cam has an all-new profile that provides .591-inch lift (15 mm) on both the intake and exhaust valves - almost .066 inch more than the LS2's already stout .525-inch lift specs.
it is a nice engine, but that cam and valve size change is pretty big and I still think is mostly responsible for the LS7's majority of it's upward power. Otherwise chevy could have had a LOT more low rpm power at the expense of high rpm power. The exhaust that opens up is a nice compromise to get the best out of high and low rpms too, but I the cams are running the show in the first place

the LS7 doesn't have a whole lot more low rpm power than a normal C6 - and is mostly negated by the even taller gearing than on the MT on the C6. Traction was obviously a concern, and why they put the power up high in the powerband aside from that's where people who really race will want it

Last edited by sentry65; Jul 1, 2007 at 06:59 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2007 | 06:53 PM
  #83  
Street Visionz, Inc.'s Avatar
Street Visionz, Inc.
Banned
iTrader: (68)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
From: So Cali
Default

can't wait until i supercharge my z06

but yes there is no replacement for displacement. combine FI and huge displacement and you can't go wrong, granted you have traction
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2007 | 06:58 PM
  #84  
nismology1's Avatar
nismology1
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 332
Likes: 1
From: South Fla.
Default

Sentry, let's bottom line this. I'll go first.

You will not find a lighter, more compact, more powerful, more fuel effiecient package than the LS7. Everything else that's better at one of these compromises at least one of the others.

Your turn.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2007 | 07:00 PM
  #85  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

i agree, always have

the LS series in general has been the best all round package of an engine - even plentifully available

that said, the rest of the non-chevy world has what they have and makes the best of it. Some people even like their engine's characteristics anyway even though it's not an LS7.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2007 | 07:04 PM
  #86  
nismology1's Avatar
nismology1
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 332
Likes: 1
From: South Fla.
Default

Originally Posted by sentry65
Some people even like their engine's characteristics anyway even though it's not an LS7.
Agreed 100%. Hence why I said...
Originally Posted by miamimax96
Just for the record, I'm an import guy. Always have and always will be. But I give credit where credit is due.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2007 | 07:14 PM
  #87  
rr_z33's Avatar
rr_z33
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 0
From: Hawaii
Default

ferrari v8's are better . them things rev up to 8500
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2007 | 07:16 PM
  #88  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

I do really like the LS7

cars are heavy these days and if the V6's are just as heavy as an LS6/7, I'd take the LS7 of course and would pay extra for it if it was a possible engine option without major aftermarket work.

these days with cars being so heavy, smaller engines weigh more and don't make enough power to push their car's weight all that much faster

it's a shame.
The vette has stayed about the same weight but gotten a lot more powerful

all the other cars out there have gotten a lot heavier and only a small amount more powerful
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2007 | 07:19 PM
  #89  
nismology1's Avatar
nismology1
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 332
Likes: 1
From: South Fla.
Default

Originally Posted by rr_z33
ferrari v8's are better . them things rev up to 8500
And are lucky to get 13 MPG highway. Sound sexy up there though.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2007 | 07:20 PM
  #90  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by rr_z33
ferrari v8's are better . them things rev up to 8500
the thing is, high revs really needs short gearing to be fast. High rev engines tend to make their power up high, so their low end power isn't so great and needs shorter gearing to make up for that.

Then again a car like the viper, has so much power on tap that people get killed in them or lose control easily because the torque is compressed so down low and also can't rev very high. They have extremely tall gearing, but it still doesn't seem to be mild enough from how many people lose control

ferrari engines are bad *** though, but well it's a ferrari engine - not something normal mortals would be willing to abuse and pay out the nose for repairwork if something on it was damaged
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2007 | 06:03 PM
  #91  
SnakeBitten's Avatar
SnakeBitten
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,505
Likes: 0
From: NY
Default

The losing control and people getting killed part has more to do with there lack of skill and knowledge of the cars characteristics than the car itself....BTW there are a few tuner 8+ ltr 8000+ rpm Viper motors out there so engine size isnt the limiting factor in how high it can rev...See SVS....

Bottom line from reading all this ish is that at the end of the day we have 300hp V6's that I cant get more than 12-16 mpg with and then theres the LS series motors that give you anywhere from 350-505hp and get over 20mpg...Oh and its only 12k for that Z06 505 hp motor from what ive read vs 7-8k for our motors.....That renders the hp/ltr/efficiency ricer bullshyte dead, period....
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2007 | 06:58 PM
  #92  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

8+ liter at 8000 rpms SVS engines are impressive, but I doubt a car manufacturer will sell them in their cars with a full normal warrenty which was my point. They're considered race engines and I wouldn't expect them to last as long as a normal production engine
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bcoffee20
Zs & Gs For Sale
5
Nov 19, 2015 06:39 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:28 AM.