Scott Bush & Relentless Autosports: Exposing the Hype, Lies, and Failure
Stan said he logged on at both their houses.. never said they logged on at each others.. If Adrian says they don't share IP's.. thats good enough.. not much more digging on the subject
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 22,096
Likes: 1
From: San Diego 92111
once again lawchick, the authority on all things FI has spoken
it has to do with RA's official Counsel making a statement we would like to keep handy incase his information is wrong in the future..
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 22,096
Likes: 1
From: San Diego 92111
plus, the only cheap shots I see anyone taking in that thread so far are from lawchick....
they will claim that they did. Hence lawchick starting in with his superior knowledge of FI and how much better the garrett that JWT is using than the Garrett that GTM are using....
plus, the only cheap shots I see anyone taking in that thread so far are from lawchick....
plus, the only cheap shots I see anyone taking in that thread so far are from lawchick....
true... and I tired to make a blanket post (in that thread) that addressed both sides - hopefully it wont turn into a pissing match... but if that particular post was the concern, I'm not sure why the entire thread was linked (it just reeked of "here's a area we can create havoc in")...
. My intent wasn't to create havoc, but it's a known fact that the person (lawchick) doesn't know what it's talking about...once again sorry for the confusion
Hey, just letting you know, I was directed to this thread, and I felt I would just comment here about a few comments made regarding the moderation on G35driver.
As you are probably aware we have no professional affiliation with Scott or RA.
Adrian
As you are probably aware we have no professional affiliation with Scott or RA.
- I am aware of no instances of any moderator on G35driver providing access to their account for Scott @ RA. I have confirmed this with the IP logs.
- Scott was incorrectly unbanned on G35driver. I feel it is reasonably transperant from this thread (and others) why he is no longer a sponsor on either G35driver or my350z. We have no intentions of "unbanning" Scott.
- The thread regarding the group buy in hindsight should not have been created, that said, it was. I feel that calling for peoples heads doesn't really achieve the true objective here which is to ensure that people receive products that they have paid for, and they are educated through the forums about dealing with certain companies.
- If you have issues/grievances with a sites moderation/administration, I feel the most appropriate form of discussing it is to contact the moderators/admins in question privately and attempt to work it out between yourselves. If that does not provide a suitable resolution, contact another moderator/admin for a "2nd opinion".
Adrian
Thanks Adrian. Good to see we are moving forward very quickly. Can you add any additional structure (on #3) as to how the recent TOU violations will be prevented in the future ? Specifically, group buys organized by G35driver moderators in support of a banned sponsor.
Scott may be a banned sponsor- but he did offer a part not available by anyone else. Don't say GT-Spec, because I cannot remember the last time it was actually offered by GT-Spec. A part a few members wanted and expressed interest in. It's a shame how it carried out, but once everything is resolved, those people who purchased it should be happy.
Also- Keep in mind, that thread started in August of 2008. If everyone here is calling foul on the Group Buy, it should have probably been mentioned before, not after when people started to receive the bar.
Problems only get solved (and prevented) by over analyzing a mistake. Witch hunts serve no purpose, I agree. I'm only drawing attention to the failed process, not the people involved. Sorry if that was not evident up front.
Last edited by ToastZ; Mar 31, 2009 at 04:04 PM.
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
From: PA
Canadian was not the intitial organizer. He came into the thread 2 months after the interest started to brew. Although, he should not have been a part of all of it, he was really in the interest of the people who wanted the bar. It really comes down to: Canadian wanted the bar and so did others.
Scott may be a banned sponsor- but he did offer a part not available by anyone else. Don't say GT-Spec, because I cannot remember the last time it was actually offered by GT-Spec. A part a few members wanted and expressed interest in. It's a shame how it carried out, but once everything is resolved, those people who purchased it should be happy.
Also- Keep in mind, that thread started in August of 2008. If everyone here is calling foul on the Group Buy, it should have probably been mentioned before, not after when people started to receive the bar.
Scott may be a banned sponsor- but he did offer a part not available by anyone else. Don't say GT-Spec, because I cannot remember the last time it was actually offered by GT-Spec. A part a few members wanted and expressed interest in. It's a shame how it carried out, but once everything is resolved, those people who purchased it should be happy.
Also- Keep in mind, that thread started in August of 2008. If everyone here is calling foul on the Group Buy, it should have probably been mentioned before, not after when people started to receive the bar.
http://g35driver.com/forums/g35-seda...-bar-sale.html
http://g35driver.com/forums/g35-coup...-bar-sale.html
http://g35driver.com/forums/g-spot/2...-bar-sale.html
Last edited by welderz; Mar 31, 2009 at 04:22 PM.
