View Poll Results: Double Slip or Stainless Bellow?
Double Slip
20
71.43%
Stainless Bellow
8
28.57%
Voters: 28. You may not vote on this poll
Momentum Peroformance Turbo Poll
#1
Vendor - Former Vendor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Momentum Peroformance Turbo Poll
At Momentum, we design our parts with as much consumer input as possible. When we come up with options, questions and potential problems, we look to the consumer for help shaping the parts to what their needs are.
I am looking for some feedback on one of the pipes we use for our 350Z/ G35 turbo kits. The crossover exhaust pipe that connects to the header and the “y” up-pipe (the pipe joining both banks going to the turbo exhaust inlet) needs to have some form of flex joint in it to permit proper flange alignment on different vehicles. On all of our prototype pipes on multiple test vehicles, we have used interlocking stainless braided flex couplers or bellows. They are welded inline with the pipe and provide good flex for alignment and a nice visual appearance. For a daily driver, these are one of the best options. They are completely sealed, provide ample flex and can help with vibration. We have had them on multiple daily driver test vehicles for six months with no issues. On our track cars, a problem that we have found is that in high heat, high stress situations, like summer temps at the road course, they begin to crack and leak.
For those wanting to use our kits in constant extreme situations, the proper fix for this is to use a double slip joint with beehive springs holding it together. These are used on a lot of “race designed” parts and provide an answer in extreme situations where the stainless bellows would fail. There down side in a daily driver application is that they will build up some carbon on the pipe were they leak slightly. This is the way they are designed for expansion, and the slight leak is negligible to performance.
My question to you all, the end user, is would you rather see the double slip joint as an option for those that want to really push their cars, or not an option and used on every kit? The real question is how many people would be upset that their crossover pipe had a little carbon on it?
Below are a couple pictures with the bellow and the slip joint. Either would work for a daily driver, while the slip joint only works for extreme track abuse.
I am looking for some feedback on one of the pipes we use for our 350Z/ G35 turbo kits. The crossover exhaust pipe that connects to the header and the “y” up-pipe (the pipe joining both banks going to the turbo exhaust inlet) needs to have some form of flex joint in it to permit proper flange alignment on different vehicles. On all of our prototype pipes on multiple test vehicles, we have used interlocking stainless braided flex couplers or bellows. They are welded inline with the pipe and provide good flex for alignment and a nice visual appearance. For a daily driver, these are one of the best options. They are completely sealed, provide ample flex and can help with vibration. We have had them on multiple daily driver test vehicles for six months with no issues. On our track cars, a problem that we have found is that in high heat, high stress situations, like summer temps at the road course, they begin to crack and leak.
For those wanting to use our kits in constant extreme situations, the proper fix for this is to use a double slip joint with beehive springs holding it together. These are used on a lot of “race designed” parts and provide an answer in extreme situations where the stainless bellows would fail. There down side in a daily driver application is that they will build up some carbon on the pipe were they leak slightly. This is the way they are designed for expansion, and the slight leak is negligible to performance.
My question to you all, the end user, is would you rather see the double slip joint as an option for those that want to really push their cars, or not an option and used on every kit? The real question is how many people would be upset that their crossover pipe had a little carbon on it?
Below are a couple pictures with the bellow and the slip joint. Either would work for a daily driver, while the slip joint only works for extreme track abuse.
#3
Registered User
iTrader: (54)
Slip joint and call it a day. Although it is overkill in terms of "is it really necessary??" for daily drivers??? At least you won't have to worry about people complaining of it breaking. I doubt once installed people will ever need to even look at it, so complaints of carbon stains are absolutely nothing to worry about.
SLIP JOINT. =)
SLIP JOINT. =)
#5
Registered User
iTrader: (35)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: louisvile KY
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The only thing I do not like about slip joints. Over time heat will weaken the springs and then you most likely have a exhaust leak. I have owned many dirt bikes and some sport bikes with slip joints and ran into problems with springs getting worn out over time. Then again if it's a real snug fit it should hold up well. But it will be black after a few thousand miles. As for a Daily Driver I would say V bands, but that's just my opinion.
Edit: If installed right flex pipes will not break.
Edit: If installed right flex pipes will not break.
Last edited by frankie945; 07-24-2009 at 12:38 PM.
#7
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Sherman, Texas
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have had to replace two flex joints on my car and it was not the most fun thing in the world. Especially since I did it in a garage with jack stands and not a lift. I vote double slip
Trending Topics
#10
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How about having a V-band where the flex is along with the V-band currently welded ( in other words, having two V-bands ). V-bands allow some slack in alignment before tightening and they allow for some thermal expansion. I used to have V-band clamps on the exhaust piping in my Pontiac Grand Prix and they offered zero leaks and much flexibility in installation and removal. They also offered crack free daily driving.
#16
New Member
iTrader: (9)
I also just noticed in your picture your talking about an NA or maybe supercharged application or is it a rear mount? If NA or supercharged it's truly not applicable even from a DD standpoint but either way if you haven't spent a few weekends at the road course double or triple dutying your car I wouldn't expect you to have an issue with a flex coupler.
If you are refering to my pictures, the turbo is located right behind the trasmision.
Don't get me wrong the idea of a flex coupler is great, its cheaper, easier to install, and much easier to make the part. From a race engineering standpoint though it's not the right way to go. You won't find them on any real circuit race cars for a good reason. They aren't reliable under those conditions. This poll was not so much to debate that as it was to find out if people would be happy with that as the standard or if a little carbon buildup would be unacceptable to the DD's. The other option is to make the double slip an option for the guys that want to regularly track their car with our turbo kit. So far it looks like having the double slip as an option is going to be the way to go.
I can't really comment on the slip coupler because I have no experience with them. That is why I didn't vote, it wouldn't be fair. It does sound like the springs are a problem though... I guss if you have the experience, and it sounds like you do, the decesion is easy, isn't it?
Last edited by BoostedProbe; 07-26-2009 at 10:23 AM.
#20
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Columbus
Posts: 1,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There will be no way to please everyone and I agree that 98% of people on here will never track their cars to the extent you are talking about. From what it sounds like, you are building a reputation for a kit that is track worthy and if there is not difference or leaks with a slip joint then I would go for that. Now if the slip joint causes noise under the car because of less flexing or something for the street drivers well then you should consider pleasing the 98% or just offer two options.