Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

stage 1 short block from IPP!

Old Mar 24, 2010 | 02:17 PM
  #41  
SH Luciano's Avatar
SH Luciano
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by ttg35fort
ACL is a manufacturer. I think by indicating "Race Spec" they mean that the bearings are designed for race motors. It would not hurt to give Kyle a call and ask him whether he is still using ACL bearings.
i just bought a motor from ipp/kyle, i'm 99% sure he's using acl.

anybody know if stock cams and very mild head work with stock valves wil rev to 7k and make power still?
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 02:20 PM
  #42  
Vas_Z33's Avatar
Vas_Z33
New Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 25
From: westchester NY
Default

Originally Posted by SH Luciano
i just bought a motor from ipp/kyle, i'm 99% sure he's using acl.

anybody know if stock cams and very mild head work with stock valves wil rev to 7k and make power still?
stock cams and heads? doubt it..
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 03:23 PM
  #43  
thom000001's Avatar
thom000001
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,891
Likes: 1
From: Chicago
Default

We were revving mine to 7200rpm (mainly for track) with stock head/cams...

Power starts falling pretty hard above 6200rpm with stock non-revup cams....I know briguy got some help with a cosworth intake, but its still hurtin up there.

Tom

Originally Posted by Vas_Z33
stock cams and heads? doubt it..
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 04:57 PM
  #44  
SH Luciano's Avatar
SH Luciano
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by thom000001
We were revving mine to 7200rpm (mainly for track) with stock head/cams...

Power starts falling pretty hard above 6200rpm with stock non-revup cams....I know briguy got some help with a cosworth intake, but its still hurtin up there.

Tom
yeah...i know bri has an upgraded valve train, which i did not opt for. so in that regard, i was more unsure if the stock valve train could make it up there without any damage.

likely i'll just keep it at the stock 6600 limit for longevity's sake.

thanks for the info though thom! we gonna meet out this summer for a cruise? briguy was telling me your car is slow...
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 05:54 PM
  #45  
ttg35fort's Avatar
ttg35fort
Professional
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,972
Likes: 2
From: South Florida
Default

Originally Posted by SH Luciano
i just bought a motor from ipp/kyle, i'm 99% sure he's using acl.

anybody know if stock cams and very mild head work with stock valves wil rev to 7k and make power still?
If I remember correctly, others are reving the stock valve train past 7k rpm, but using BC cams. GTM cams should work well too. Now, I don't know if there was any valve float going on. Maybe some of those guys can chime in here. I'll bet Tom has some good info on this.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 06:57 PM
  #46  
Vas_Z33's Avatar
Vas_Z33
New Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 25
From: westchester NY
Default

^ BC stage 2 cames are great!! for mid- high end... more mid.... and the stage 3 screams up top! definitely on my list!
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 07:01 PM
  #47  
thom000001's Avatar
thom000001
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,891
Likes: 1
From: Chicago
Default

For the street I shifted at stock redline (ok when the tach read stock redline, who knows what that really was rpm wise though lol....these gauges suck).

There isn't any damage, just more wear and tear over time for sure.

Ha of course my car is slow!!!!. Bri and I never got to line up (only met up once and it was actually about the last time I was out....clutch was slippin so bad it smelled like a metal smelter, and I could barely pull on Ron's car)

But that'll be fixed and a few changes....gotta make up for the extra G weight againgst you slim Z folks!!!!!! (fingers crossed for 650+rwhp on pump gas baby)

Originally Posted by SH Luciano
yeah...i know bri has an upgraded valve train, which i did not opt for. so in that regard, i was more unsure if the stock valve train could make it up there without any damage.

likely i'll just keep it at the stock 6600 limit for longevity's sake.

thanks for the info though thom! we gonna meet out this summer for a cruise? briguy was telling me your car is slow...

there is definately some float above 7k on stock setup.

I know BC says for the stage 2's you don't need to change springs and such, but you are certainly gonna be giving up something up top. Especially on a motor with miles! (my motor only had 17k miles on it when we tore it apart and valves still get some float).

Since going to 272's we are definately going with upgraded springs/shims!!!!

Tom

Originally Posted by ttg35fort
If I remember correctly, others are reving the stock valve train past 7k rpm, but using BC cams. GTM cams should work well too. Now, I don't know if there was any valve float going on. Maybe some of those guys can chime in here. I'll bet Tom has some good info on this.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 07:06 PM
  #48  
thom000001's Avatar
thom000001
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,891
Likes: 1
From: Chicago
Default

Based on BC's website, if those two dyno's are at same boost (everything else same), then the 272's make more power and tq everywhere!!!!! And never fall off up top.

Wonder if anyone knows if those are the same setup with just different cams.

Tom

Originally Posted by Vas_Z33
^ BC stage 2 cames are great!! for mid- high end... more mid.... and the stage 3 screams up top! definitely on my list!
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 07:08 PM
  #49  
str8dum1's Avatar
str8dum1
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 7
From: raleigh-wood NC
Default

650 mustang on pump will be a tall order as XKR didnt even do that with bigger turbos. Well I guess he coulda if Sharif kept pushing.

I am not sure what those dynos on BCs website are comparing. The stage 3 dyno is not comparing stage2 to stage 3 though....
Less talk, more build Tom!

Originally Posted by thom000001
But that'll be fixed and a few changes....gotta make up for the extra G weight againgst you slim Z folks!!!!!! (fingers crossed for 650+rwhp on pump gas baby)

Tom

Last edited by str8dum1; Mar 24, 2010 at 07:13 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 07:14 PM
  #50  
thom000001's Avatar
thom000001
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,891
Likes: 1
From: Chicago
Default

I'm hoping though....

Vito's car (same bottom end as me), with 55mm billet turbos (mine are 58's rest same) and 264 cams (I'm trying 272's) made 621rwhp on pump (on same dyno)......so I'm hopin. VITO I'M COMIN FOR YA!!!!!

Car gets dropped off on monday now. Pretty much as fast as precision gets the turbos back to SP, the car will get done!!!!

Tom

P.S. - I took hp/tq vs rpm and plotted them on another graph to compare from the 2 diff dyno sheets on BC's site....guess we'll find out here in a couple weeks.

Originally Posted by str8dum1
650 mustang on pump will be a tall order as XKR didnt even do that with bigger turbos. Well I guess he coulda if Sharif kept pushing.

I am not sure what those dynos on BCs website are comparing. Stage 2's have zero gain then, if thats really a before and after as the Stage3s must be
Less talk, more build Tom!

Last edited by thom000001; Mar 24, 2010 at 07:19 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 07:14 PM
  #51  
Vas_Z33's Avatar
Vas_Z33
New Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 25
From: westchester NY
Default

True I wonder if anyone knows... dude im surprised you havnt upgraded to cams yet!!! ur setup plus cams plus c16

Originally Posted by thom000001
Based on BC's website, if those two dyno's are at same boost (everything else same), then the 272's make more power and tq everywhere!!!!! And never fall off up top.

Wonder if anyone knows if those are the same setup with just different cams.

Tom
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 07:15 PM
  #52  
Vas_Z33's Avatar
Vas_Z33
New Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 25
From: westchester NY
Default

Originally Posted by thom000001
I'm hoping though....

Vito's car (same bottom end as me), with 55mm billet turbos (mine are 58's rest same) and 264 cams (I'm trying 272's) made 621rwhp on pump (on same dyno)......so I'm hopin.

Car gets dropped off on monday now. Pretty much as fast as precision gets the turbos back to SP, the car will get done!!!!

Tom

P.S. - I took hp/tq vs rpm and plotted them on another graph to compare from the 2 diff dyno sheets on BC's site....guess we'll find out here in a couple weeks.
woah woah.. i guess you are! nvm ! haha
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 07:23 PM
  #53  
str8dum1's Avatar
str8dum1
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 7
From: raleigh-wood NC
Default

Ya i forgot he made that much, but with alot more boost (18psi vs 14psi). twin 6262 should be fun but your twin 58s will be ok as well.

But if your curve looks stronger than Vitos on pump, XKR might have to reconsider long tubes




Originally Posted by thom000001
I'm hoping though....

Vito's car (same bottom end as me), with 55mm billet turbos (mine are 58's rest same) and 264 cams (I'm trying 272's) made 621rwhp on pump (on same dyno)......so I'm hopin. VITO I'M COMIN FOR YA!!!!!

Car gets dropped off on monday now. Pretty much as fast as precision gets the turbos back to SP, the car will get done!!!!

Tom

P.S. - I took hp/tq vs rpm and plotted them on another graph to compare from the 2 diff dyno sheets on BC's site....guess we'll find out here in a couple weeks.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 07:30 PM
  #54  
thom000001's Avatar
thom000001
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,891
Likes: 1
From: Chicago
Default

HEHEHE,
Since the exducer (is that the exhaust one always get them confused) is the same size on both 5557 and 5857 (at least thats what I've found so far online), lag should be about same as on both (i.e. within 500rpm)....but don't know what the cams will due to affect that as well.....

Granted I couldn't even guess what the tune was like for either car (2 different tuners on 2 different dyno's).

With any luck I'll be at ZdayZ and we can put all this long tube vs log to rest (or create a whole lot more controversy LOL)

We shall Z, I mean See.

Tom

Originally Posted by str8dum1
Ya i forgot he made that much, but with alot more boost (18psi vs 14psi). twin 6262 should be fun but your twin 58s will be ok as well.

But if your curve looks stronger than Vitos on pump, XKR might have to reconsider long tubes

Last edited by thom000001; Mar 24, 2010 at 07:32 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 09:24 PM
  #55  
SH Luciano's Avatar
SH Luciano
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by thom000001
For the street I shifted at stock redline (ok when the tach read stock redline, who knows what that really was rpm wise though lol....these gauges suck).

There isn't any damage, just more wear and tear over time for sure.

Ha of course my car is slow!!!!. Bri and I never got to line up (only met up once and it was actually about the last time I was out....clutch was slippin so bad it smelled like a metal smelter, and I could barely pull on Ron's car)

But that'll be fixed and a few changes....gotta make up for the extra G weight againgst you slim Z folks!!!!!! (fingers crossed for 650+rwhp on pump gas baby)

there is definately some float above 7k on stock setup.

I know BC says for the stage 2's you don't need to change springs and such, but you are certainly gonna be giving up something up top. Especially on a motor with miles! (my motor only had 17k miles on it when we tore it apart and valves still get some float).

Since going to 272's we are definately going with upgraded springs/shims!!!!

Tom
hehe...i'm just bustin yer *****. when/where's the first chi-town meet this year?

i'll probably be shifting at stock redline then. i'm only running the aps single, so it's not like i'm going to make much power anyways.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 10:03 PM
  #56  
zmedic16's Avatar
zmedic16
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
From: bronx new york
Default

Talk about thread hijacking.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2010 | 06:47 AM
  #57  
str8dum1's Avatar
str8dum1
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 7
From: raleigh-wood NC
Default

LOL, thats because no one really cares if someone just bought a 2500$ shortblock
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2010 | 08:04 AM
  #58  
erichsherrill's Avatar
erichsherrill
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey / NOVA
Default

hey hey 2600$.. lol i gotta start sumwhere.. but the thread jack was cool i learned some ****
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2010 | 08:13 AM
  #59  
Vas_Z33's Avatar
Vas_Z33
New Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 25
From: westchester NY
Default

well its been hijacked by the good people.. with good info =)
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2010 | 09:12 AM
  #60  
GreenGoblin's Avatar
GreenGoblin
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,732
Likes: 1
From: South Flordia
Default

Vas that pic of your car reminds me of a cat for some reason the canards are the wiskers, emblem the nose, opening the mouth, headlight eyes.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:57 AM.