Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Garrett compressor covers

Old Dec 6, 2010 | 05:47 AM
  #21  
Boosted Performance's Avatar
Boosted Performance
Thread Starter
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 18
From: Edmonton, AB
Default

Originally Posted by GT-ER
Yes, you are right. I linked the wrong thing. The Nissan cover also goes by the name of GT28 cover...at least that is what I have noticed.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 05:55 AM
  #22  
GT-ER's Avatar
GT-ER
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
From: Puerto Rico
Default

Originally Posted by Boosted Performance
Yes, you are right. I linked the wrong thing. The Nissan cover also goes by the name of GT28 cover...at least that is what I have noticed.
That's because the GT2860R originally came in with that cover and the T25 turbine housing so that it could be a direct swap for skylines and such...it was uber popular.

I've played with hundreds of turbos and I honestly have yet to see a housing smaller than a T04B housing for the larger turbo's. The smaller T3 turbo's however get the tiny .42 A/R compressor housing which is super compact but it only goes up to a T3 Super 60 ( which is not too bad, it can push over 650whp on a twin setup and it's pretty cheap ).
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 09:38 AM
  #23  
str8dum1's Avatar
str8dum1
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 7
From: raleigh-wood NC
Default

huh, they obviously used a saw and welder the turbo in the pic which you find accpetable...

and special flanges dont mean anything either with a saw and welder.

Originally Posted by Boosted Performance
I would never sell a kit to anybody, if they had to use either one of those tools. That would go against what I am trying to accomplish.

I could always do something like this though:

Last edited by str8dum1; Dec 6, 2010 at 09:41 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 10:04 AM
  #24  
Boosted Performance's Avatar
Boosted Performance
Thread Starter
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 18
From: Edmonton, AB
Default

Originally Posted by str8dum1
huh, they obviously used a saw and welder the turbo in the pic which you find accpetable...

and special flanges dont mean anything either with a saw and welder.
What I was refering to, is that I don't want the customer to have to use a saw and welder.

Slight misunderstanding I think..
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 10:14 AM
  #25  
binder's Avatar
binder
New Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 7
From: terre haute, IN; STL, MO
Default

vr3 got twin 5557's to work in there. That is the setup i think would be ideal for my goals. I'm happy with what i have (once i get it back up and running) but the 5557 twins would be sick.

https://my350z.com/forum/shop-builds...n-93oct-3.html
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 10:27 AM
  #26  
str8dum1's Avatar
str8dum1
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 7
From: raleigh-wood NC
Default

ahh ok. well obviously saws and welders shouldnt be left to the customer. HAHA

Originally Posted by Boosted Performance
What I was refering to, is that I don't want the customer to have to use a saw and welder.

Slight misunderstanding I think..
You could get the same power curve using a standard easy to install greddy 20g kit as well. that 6765 is a better choice in terms of install and powerband, once you get running again

Originally Posted by binder
vr3 got twin 5557's to work in there. That is the setup i think would be ideal for my goals. I'm happy with what i have (once i get it back up and running) but the 5557 twins would be sick.

https://my350z.com/forum/shop-builds...n-93oct-3.html

Last edited by str8dum1; Dec 6, 2010 at 10:29 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 10:48 AM
  #27  
SH Luciano's Avatar
SH Luciano
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by str8dum1
You could get the same power curve using a standard easy to install greddy 20g kit as well. that 6765 is a better choice in terms of install and powerband, once you get running again
but i think point of a BP twin turbo kit is to have a fairly easy install without having to pull the motor, which seems to be general consensus on how to properly install a greddy kit. Ultimatley getting you a fatter powerband than his single kit without the install headaches of the APS, Greddy, etc...twin kits.

Last edited by SH Luciano; Dec 6, 2010 at 10:51 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 10:53 AM
  #28  
Boosted Performance's Avatar
Boosted Performance
Thread Starter
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 18
From: Edmonton, AB
Default

Originally Posted by binder
vr3 got twin 5557's to work in there. That is the setup i think would be ideal for my goals. I'm happy with what i have (once i get it back up and running) but the 5557 twins would be sick.

https://my350z.com/forum/shop-builds...n-93oct-3.html
Jeff, I think you will be very happy with the 6765 once tuned on more than 13psi of boost.

Also, those headers are custom, and I am trying to stay away from that. The idea is to have a TT kit that anybody can install themselves without having to remove the motor, relocate a bunch of stuff..ect. Bolt on is the key, just like the ST kit you have on your car now.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 11:40 AM
  #29  
GT-ER's Avatar
GT-ER
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
From: Puerto Rico
Default

How much power would this turbo kit be aimed at?
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 12:42 PM
  #30  
Boosted Performance's Avatar
Boosted Performance
Thread Starter
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 18
From: Edmonton, AB
Default

Originally Posted by GT-ER
How much power would this turbo kit be aimed at?
Hard to say without actual testing. The GT2871R is claimed to make up to 400hp on a 2.2L, so your guess is as good as my.

Last edited by Boosted Performance; Dec 6, 2010 at 12:43 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 01:10 PM
  #31  
GT-ER's Avatar
GT-ER
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
From: Puerto Rico
Default

I ask because if you wish to make an economical kit you could go with twin T3 60 trims Stage 1 with a .48 or .63 turbine housing and it should not only spool pretty good but power output could go as high as 600whp. Each turbo is about $600 too.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 01:19 PM
  #32  
Boosted Performance's Avatar
Boosted Performance
Thread Starter
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 18
From: Edmonton, AB
Default

Originally Posted by GT-ER
I ask because if you wish to make an economical kit you could go with twin T3 60 trims Stage 1 with a .48 or .63 turbine housing and it should not only spool pretty good but power output could go as high as 600whp. Each turbo is about $600 too.
Yeah, not sure about the T3 fitment, it is much larger than the T25
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 01:19 PM
  #33  
str8dum1's Avatar
str8dum1
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 7
From: raleigh-wood NC
Default

at that point, you have to decide what's more important. a 1 time install, or slower spool that happens everytime.

BP has a nice niche market because his kit doesnt extend the uppipe any further than options already on the market. But the TT kits hang off the exhaust ports essentially. Theres no denying that spool will be effected, and to the extent it would be hard to say.

Pulling the motor is very easy, so i would not let that drive your decision. Plus if you were looking for a better powerband than is already offered in his single kits, you have to pull the motor anyhow to get it built...


Originally Posted by SH Luciano
but i think point of a BP twin turbo kit is to have a fairly easy install without having to pull the motor, which seems to be general consensus on how to properly install a greddy kit. Ultimatley getting you a fatter powerband than his single kit without the install headaches of the APS, Greddy, etc...twin kits.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 01:36 PM
  #34  
Boosted Performance's Avatar
Boosted Performance
Thread Starter
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 18
From: Edmonton, AB
Default

Originally Posted by str8dum1
at that point, you have to decide what's more important. a 1 time install, or slower spool that happens everytime.

BP has a nice niche market because his kit doesnt extend the uppipe any further than options already on the market. But the TT kits hang off the exhaust ports essentially. Theres no denying that spool will be effected, and to the extent it would be hard to say.

Pulling the motor is very easy, so i would not let that drive your decision. Plus if you were looking for a better powerband than is already offered in his single kits, you have to pull the motor anyhow to get it built...
To be honest, I don't think spool will suffer all that much at all. I don't see why it would. The distance from heads to turbo is minimal. I would only be adding about 4-6" of pipe from the existing header flanges. Now, if you are to get some tubilar manifolds, I am sure that it would go a long way as well.

As far as pulling the motor goes, it is not only during the install. What if you have to service a turbo. A friend of my had the GTM built motor with APS TT kit on, and one of the turbos blew. He took the car to a shop, replaced both turbos and the bill was $12,000 for parts and labor. Not to mention down time. Just something to consider I guess.

I know that I would hate having to pull the motor to service a turbo, and I am sure most feel the same way, easy or not.

Last edited by Boosted Performance; Dec 6, 2010 at 01:38 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 01:41 PM
  #35  
tig488's Avatar
tig488
New Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,660
Likes: 0
From: bama
Default

sorry youre right, the B cover is the smaller one, its been almost 4 years since i sold my POS APS ST kit, i think it had that cover. i actually still have it sitting around if you need it to try out. you can have it.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 01:44 PM
  #36  
Boosted Performance's Avatar
Boosted Performance
Thread Starter
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 18
From: Edmonton, AB
Default

Originally Posted by tig488
sorry youre right, the B cover is the smaller one, its been almost 4 years since i sold my POS APS ST kit, i think it had that cover. i actually still have it sitting around if you need it to try out. you can have it.
You have the turbo or compressor cover? I think the turbo is a T3?
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 02:28 PM
  #37  
GT-ER's Avatar
GT-ER
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
From: Puerto Rico
Default

Originally Posted by Boosted Performance
Yeah, not sure about the T3 fitment, it is much larger than the T25
T3 5bolt .48 are pretty small. Not as small as a T25 .64 but pretty close to a T25 .86. I don't see it really being an issue.

I had a T3 50trim stage1 .48 in my garage about 2 months ago and it was pretty tiny.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 02:29 PM
  #38  
Boosted Performance's Avatar
Boosted Performance
Thread Starter
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,782
Likes: 18
From: Edmonton, AB
Default

Originally Posted by GT-ER
T3 5bolt .48 are pretty small. Not as small as a T25 .64 but pretty close to a T25 .86. I don't see it really being an issue.

I had a T3 50trim stage1 .48 in my garage about 2 months ago and it was pretty tiny.
Hmmm interesting...I should take turbo donation for fitment tryouts..
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 02:31 PM
  #39  
GT-ER's Avatar
GT-ER
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
From: Puerto Rico
Default

Originally Posted by Boosted Performance
Hmmm interesting...I should take turbo donation for fitment tryouts..
I'll tell you what....you can find T3 50trims on ebay ( early saab's and volvo's used them ) for dirt cheap. I've bought them for as little as $50 shipped and they fit in a Priority mail flat rate box.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2010 | 06:37 PM
  #40  
Quamen's Avatar
Quamen
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 2
From: Wisconsin
Default

Originally Posted by GT-ER
I ask because if you wish to make an economical kit you could go with twin T3 60 trims Stage 1 with a .48 or .63 turbine housing and it should not only spool pretty good but power output could go as high as 600whp. Each turbo is about $600 too.
BP, if this is the limit of a twin I would stay away from it. Your single kit is already capable of significantly more than this with the 6765.

Can you fit turbos with a higher horsepower limit than this with the design you have in mind?
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:38 AM.