Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

476rwhp on Stock Block

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 12, 2011 | 09:57 AM
  #21  
thatv35guy's Avatar
thatv35guy
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 723
Likes: 59
From: Gilbert, AZ
Thumbs up

I had a huge scare during a 5th gear pull, lol…ran 4th gear to redline, spent several seconds pulling in 5th gear, then all of a sudden the car detonated, I let off the throttle and is sounded like the engine was coming apart, tiny pieces just breaking off… I pictured a catastrophic engine failure, my heart sank, I started to break into a cold sweat. Well, I pulled over and found the front splash guard came apart and was just getting minced by the tire, lol…pulled it off and started boosting away again.

But good luck OP, I’m curious to see how your stock engine holds up; I’ve got to up the boost on my car now.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2011 | 09:57 AM
  #22  
rh_334's Avatar
rh_334
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Default

Originally Posted by Nexx
so be concerned at low and high speeds... great. good thing OP is getting ready build. OP beat the crap out of it and see how much she can handle before popping!
like this?
http://www.vimeo.com/18636148

i couldnt get this to embed for some reason
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2011 | 12:00 PM
  #23  
drivessidewayz's Avatar
drivessidewayz
New Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 892
Likes: 0
From: Akron, OH
Default

Originally Posted by Boosted Performance
I would be more concerned with low gear acceleration with all that torque down low, over high speed runs. Even in 3rd if you hit it at 3000rpm, the stress on the rods will be much higher than a top speed run do to the torque. This of course applies if you have good rubber with good grip.
From my understanding:

High gear pulls are worse than low. The engine is under load far longer in this situation and as someone already mentioned, temps go up. The engine produces the same amount of torque whether in 1st gear or 6th gear; the drivetrain changes the amount of torque at the wheels.

Grippy tires don't affect rods; those affect other drivetrain components such as axles. I believe the torque you are referring to is the torque at the wheels rather than the torque at the rods.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2011 | 12:18 PM
  #24  
rh_334's Avatar
rh_334
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Default

Originally Posted by drivessidewayz
From my understanding:

High gear pulls are worse than low. The engine is under load far longer in this situation and as someone already mentioned, temps go up. The engine produces the same amount of torque whether in 1st gear or 6th gear; the drivetrain changes the amount of torque at the wheels.

Grippy tires don't affect rods; those affect other drivetrain components such as axles. I believe the torque you are referring to is the torque at the wheels rather than the torque at the rods.
grippy tires load the engine which builds boost and creates TQ, read my post in response to this
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2011 | 02:10 PM
  #25  
drivessidewayz's Avatar
drivessidewayz
New Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 892
Likes: 0
From: Akron, OH
Default

Originally Posted by rh_334
grippy tires load the engine which builds boost and creates TQ, read my post in response to this
Well, I was wrong then. But as I said, "from my understanding". Learn something new every day
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2011 | 06:57 PM
  #26  
red35's Avatar
red35
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: alberta canada
Default

Good numbers. I am making 473whp@10.5psi with a JWT 700 kit and meth on a stock block as well. It has held together with 1/4mile runs and some longer pulls in the higher gears. But just could be a matter of time as well. Going up to 13-14psi in the spring to try it out.

Last edited by red35; Jan 12, 2011 at 07:15 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2011 | 07:19 PM
  #27  
0jiggy0's Avatar
0jiggy0
New Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,418
Likes: 13
From: Long Island, NY
Default

Originally Posted by Nexx
so be concerned at low and high speeds... great. good thing OP is getting ready build. OP beat the crap out of it and see how much she can handle before popping!
I dont think the OP cares as hes stated. Calm down negative nancy.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2011 | 09:15 PM
  #28  
phunk's Avatar
phunk
CJ Motorsports
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,997
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
Default

nice power.

i made 467rwhp dynojet SAE at 9 psi on my stock block in 2004. At STD setting, it would be probably the same exact number you are at. Raised rev limiter to 7000.

I took the car out street racing literally every night for a couple seasons. Ran it very hard, banging on the speed limiter at least once a night. Running on the drag radials from a stop or roll races on the 19s. I beat the living **** out of that poor engine.

When I tore it down to do a build, the internals were mint. The bearings looked brand new too.

Keep the tune good and dont starve fuel pressure running a low tank around a hard right and then full throttle... and it should be pretty difficult to blow it up. its all in the tune.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2011 | 04:22 AM
  #29  
rh_334's Avatar
rh_334
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Default

Originally Posted by phunk
nice power.

i made 467rwhp dynojet SAE at 9 psi on my stock block in 2004. At STD setting, it would be probably the same exact number you are at. Raised rev limiter to 7000.
i think thats Exactly what it was SAE, thats what i used to go by but since pretty much everyone here uses STD i switched, and also i read that STD is more accurate for boosted engines. But also Z1's dyno reads very low compared to other Dynojets in the area(stock VQ35 ~205-210), im going to try to makeit to another DJ sometime and see what the #s are.

And my rev limit is at 7k and thats where a shift, but in 5th gear on the dyno i just didn't want to risk it
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2011 | 12:45 PM
  #30  
binder's Avatar
binder
New Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 7
From: terre haute, IN; STL, MO
Default

nice numbers but i got a good laugh out of the tune being reserved for c6 and built tt z's. z06 c6 puts out 515hp, you still wo'nt touch it along with a built TT z. They will be tuned for a lot higher than 476. No reason to blow your car up on a race you know youre already going to lose.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2011 | 01:13 PM
  #31  
Sylvan Lake V35's Avatar
Sylvan Lake V35
Registered User
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 1
From: Alberta Canada
Default

Originally Posted by binder
nice numbers but i got a good laugh out of the tune being reserved for c6 and built tt z's. z06 c6 puts out 515hp, you still wo'nt touch it along with a built TT z. They will be tuned for a lot higher than 476. No reason to blow your car up on a race you know youre already going to lose.

I just went on a Zo6 forum the one dyno 450whp stock he did 479 with K&N headers and a tune another I found did 470whp stock so he is in the same ball park power wise however they are alot lighter and torquey. I race cars that should beat me all of the time, just because they have more power doesn't mean they can drive I smoked a Shelby GT500 when i had 400whp he had a 1,000,000 excuses.....but he still saw nothing but tail lights.

Last edited by Sylvan Lake V35; Jan 15, 2011 at 01:28 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2011 | 01:27 PM
  #32  
ocdz's Avatar
ocdz
Registered User
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 800
Likes: 7
From: central ohio
Default

Originally Posted by binder
nice numbers but i got a good laugh out of the tune being reserved for c6 and built tt z's. z06 c6 puts out 515hp, you still wo'nt touch it along with a built TT z. They will be tuned for a lot higher than 476. No reason to blow your car up on a race you know youre already going to lose.
z06 makes that at the flywheel... which is a topic thats been beaten dead. if he's making 476 at the wheels, he has a fair chance.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2011 | 02:15 PM
  #33  
str8dum1's Avatar
str8dum1
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 7
From: raleigh-wood NC
Default

He's making a ton less trq than a V8, unless hes brake boosting, it would be lights out.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2011 | 04:07 PM
  #34  
SH Luciano's Avatar
SH Luciano
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by str8dum1
He's making a ton less trq than a V8, unless hes brake boosting, it would be lights out.
agreed. briguymax on this board raced a buddy of mine with a stock z06 and bri took him by like a 1/2 a car...the z06 was stock.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2011 | 08:34 PM
  #35  
binder's Avatar
binder
New Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 7
From: terre haute, IN; STL, MO
Default

Originally Posted by str8dum1
He's making a ton less trq than a V8, unless hes brake boosting, it would be lights out.
finally someone that actually races cars chimes in also.

Duh people, the tq from the v8 and INSTANT power will make the vette win every time. Just go against an auto and all he has to do is push down teh pedal and walk away.

Op is obviously talking about street racing and not drag strip so you can't really argue about "racing skills".
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2011 | 04:35 AM
  #36  
43V0_3V0M's Avatar
43V0_3V0M
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ
Default

Reply
Old Jan 16, 2011 | 09:55 AM
  #37  
Sylvan Lake V35's Avatar
Sylvan Lake V35
Registered User
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 1
From: Alberta Canada
Default

Shouldn't race if you can't win......wow I bet you guys have fun racing sunfires. I want to race cars that win or lose they gave me a good run. I guess maybe not everyone is that competitive though and get a rush from racing sure things.

Last edited by Sylvan Lake V35; Jan 16, 2011 at 10:09 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2011 | 10:09 AM
  #38  
Erdem's Avatar
Erdem
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 1
From: Denmark
Default

very true Sylvan.. I feel the same way..
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2011 | 10:13 AM
  #39  
Sylvan Lake V35's Avatar
Sylvan Lake V35
Registered User
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 1
From: Alberta Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Erdem
very true Sylvan.. I feel the same way..
I edited it so I don't derail the thread, I kept the point the same though.

He never said he beats z06s just that he wants to race them, I can respect a guy that isn't afraid to try against the odds
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2011 | 02:04 PM
  #40  
Mr.Squeeze's Avatar
Mr.Squeeze
New Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
From: Bronx N.Y/North N.J
Default

Originally Posted by Sylvan Lake V35
I just went on a Zo6 forum the one dyno 450whp stock he did 479 with K&N headers and a tune another I found did 470whp stock so he is in the same ball park power wise however they are alot lighter and torquey. I race cars that should beat me all of the time, just because they have more power doesn't mean they can drive I smoked a Shelby GT500 when i had 400whp he had a 1,000,000 excuses.....but he still saw nothing but tail lights.

I agree with this 100 percent most people forget about this.


Nice number by the way.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:38 AM.