Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

*ATTENTION SHOPS!* What oil do you use & recommend???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 17, 2011 | 06:54 AM
  #41  
rcdash's Avatar
rcdash
New Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,474
Likes: 65
From: Chapel Hill, NC
Default

Originally Posted by Cass007
I'm using 10w30 and may switch to the 20w50 before the airstrip. What is your idle set at? My pressure was at 30psi when the idle was ~1100-1200rpm. Cold start is 90psi as well.

IMO there is no "wrong" oil, I've spun mains on at least 3 different kinds
My idle is set at 800 rpms. The only thing I worry about is cold start lubrication with a 20 weight oil. Maybe in the summer it's ok.

Last edited by rcdash; Apr 17, 2011 at 06:56 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2011 | 07:09 AM
  #42  
Gingervitis526's Avatar
Gingervitis526
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,486
Likes: 1
From: Fort Walton Beach, FL
Default

Originally Posted by rcdash
My idle is set at 800 rpms. The only thing I worry about is cold start lubrication with a 20 weight oil. Maybe in the summer it's ok.
If you look at that Lucas additive I posted its supposed to act as a "climbing" agent that helps with cold start lubrication.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2011 | 12:14 PM
  #43  
Resolute's Avatar
Resolute
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,097
Likes: 3
From: @7000 ft
Default

Originally Posted by Gingervitis526
If you look at that Lucas additive I posted its supposed to act as a "climbing" agent that helps with cold start lubrication.
It is high-tack, but it also foams badly and introduces air into the oil, which naturally inhibits hydrodynamic lubrication. I wouldn't ever use it, and I think if you search the internet on Lucas oil additive foaming, you might be convinced to discontinue using it.

Will
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2011 | 12:45 PM
  #44  
XBS's Avatar
XBS
Veteran
Premier Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,856
Likes: 3
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Resolute
It is high-tack, but it also foams badly and introduces air into the oil, which naturally inhibits hydrodynamic lubrication. I wouldn't ever use it, and I think if you search the internet on Lucas oil additive foaming, you might be convinced to discontinue using it.

Will
Good too know, I always thought it was some sort of gimmick, I would laugh at the displays they setup at auto part stores with the spinning plastic gears lol.

-George
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2011 | 12:51 PM
  #45  
Resolute's Avatar
Resolute
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,097
Likes: 3
From: @7000 ft
Default

Originally Posted by XBS
Good too know, I always thought it was some sort of gimmick, I would laugh at the displays they setup at auto part stores with the spinning plastic gears lol.

-George
Yeah, that was a clever display. When you turned the gears, the oil would "climb" by clinging to the teeth. Of course, if you could turn the gears at 600 rpm, it would have looked very different, and that's just what one guy did to show the effect. The oil foamed badly.

Will
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2011 | 01:09 PM
  #46  
XBS's Avatar
XBS
Veteran
Premier Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,856
Likes: 3
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Wow, simple and effective test. I would love to see that, is it on youtube for any chance?

I know so many people that swear my lucas additives, I have never been a fan of any commercial additive. It is funny when you try to tell them they don't need it and how defensive they get.

If it cost money it must be good right?
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2011 | 01:49 PM
  #47  
Resolute's Avatar
Resolute
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,097
Likes: 3
From: @7000 ft
Default

Originally Posted by XBS
Wow, simple and effective test. I would love to see that, is it on youtube for any chance?

I know so many people that swear my lucas additives, I have never been a fan of any commercial additive. It is funny when you try to tell them they don't need it and how defensive they get.

If it cost money it must be good right?
Hmm... It used to be linked right on the front page of the BITOG site, but it appears to have been removed. After some digging, it seems Lucas re-did the formula sometime in 2009 and the new product wasn't nearly as thick as the old formula. I don't know if that changed anything or not for performance, but BITOG took down the original test.

Will
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2011 | 09:15 PM
  #48  
Gingervitis526's Avatar
Gingervitis526
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,486
Likes: 1
From: Fort Walton Beach, FL
Default

Originally Posted by Resolute
It is high-tack, but it also foams badly and introduces air into the oil, which naturally inhibits hydrodynamic lubrication. I wouldn't ever use it, and I think if you search the internet on Lucas oil additive foaming, you might be convinced to discontinue using it.

Will
Good to know... I've only used it once so maybe I should just stop while I'm ahead.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2011 | 06:20 AM
  #49  
GreenGoblin's Avatar
GreenGoblin
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,732
Likes: 1
From: South Flordia
Default

Will thank you for the additional info, very well educated on the matter.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2011 | 05:10 PM
  #50  
Jtran Studios's Avatar
Jtran Studios
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Default

Joe Gibbs, rotella t, or Delo is what we use at the shop. Depending on what is available to us at the time.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2011 | 05:00 PM
  #51  
RudeG_v2.0's Avatar
RudeG_v2.0
Thread Starter
でたらめ検出器
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,800
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by Jtran Studios
Joe Gibbs, rotella t, or Delo is what we use at the shop. Depending on what is available to us at the time.
Thanks for contributing! I hope other shops follow your example.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2011 | 09:03 AM
  #52  
Alberto's Avatar
Alberto
Cranky FI Owner
Premier Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 34,715
Likes: 8
From: DMV
Default

The fact that most shops see this and read this but dont share such simple info is exactly why this community is fawking weaksauce and so far behind others even after 8 years.

Fawk all you slow f@ggots
Reply
Old May 8, 2011 | 06:30 PM
  #53  
SnyperZ's Avatar
SnyperZ
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 1
From: Connecticut
Default

I run Valvoline VR-1 racing oil. It has good zinc content. Rotellas formula was changed a few years back and its pretty much normal oil. If you don't have cats you wanna get the VR1 in the black bottle. It has really high zinc content and kills cats. Thats the stuff I run.

Last edited by SnyperZ; May 8, 2011 at 06:31 PM.
Reply
Old May 9, 2011 | 10:00 AM
  #54  
dikspiel's Avatar
dikspiel
Chestons Toilet
Premier Member
iTrader: (70)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,859
Likes: 92
From: Cheston's
Default

Which VR-1 are you using?
Reply
Old May 9, 2011 | 10:31 AM
  #55  
djamps's Avatar
djamps
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,492
Likes: 10
From: MD
Default

Originally Posted by Alberto
Fawk all you slow f@ggots
sig worthy
Reply
Old May 9, 2011 | 11:30 AM
  #56  
Z1 Performance's Avatar
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 5
From: Long Island, New York
Default

It's very difficult to have a thread like this and come out with a cohesive answer. It will be very subjective, based upon the clearances that the engine was set up to during assembly by the builder/machinist. Those clearances are based on a number of factors including the parts used (pistons/rods), the bearings used (stock, aftermarket, if aftermarket, which), and the intended rpm range. This is also why all the UOA results in the world don't tend to reveal much aside from a marketing campaign, unless you have a very, very broad cross section of engines (all prepared the same way) to compare results against. I don't think most failures out there can be traced to one oil being used over another. Tends to be due to just a badly built engine

The best advise is simply go back to your source. Use the oil(s), and viscosity recommended by whomever actually assembled your engine. Not the person who sold you the engine, not the person who sold you the parts, but the person who actually put it together. They will have their own go-to favorites based on the specifics of that engine build.

Not FI, but for my VQ, my machinist made a very specific oil recommendation, and I've stuck by it since completing the break in (2007). Royal Purple XPR 20/50 with a WIX filter. I'm sure there are others that he would be totally fine with me using as well, but this stuff is readily available for me, so it's all I've ever used. If he told me I could run Wolfs Head, or whatever other brand, I'd use it. Ultimately it's his engine, and it's what he is paid to be the expert on. I just follow his directions. 4 years later and the engine runs great, and has not given me any issues. Doesn't use any oil, oil pressure is always consistent no matter what the weather, and I change it every 2500-3000 just because of the rpms I run. Overkill I'm sure, but it's worked, so its just superstitiously what I do.

However, on other engines of mine that he has built, he has had different recommendations...and in some cases (like for our BMW ITS cars), they were always done around being able to use a more 'normal' off the shelf dino (which for us is typically Castrol GTX 10w30, since you can get it anywhere you happen to be). These engines were never exotic internally mind you, they just needed to last at least a seasons worth.

Last edited by Z1 Performance; May 9, 2011 at 11:43 AM.
Reply
Old May 9, 2011 | 05:03 PM
  #57  
SnyperZ's Avatar
SnyperZ
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 1
From: Connecticut
Default

Originally Posted by dikspiel
Which VR-1 are you using?

Non synthetic 20-50 (changed every 1500 miles or after each track day) Or you can run the synthetic and change it every 3000 miles..cost is just about the same....
Reply
Old May 9, 2011 | 10:48 PM
  #58  
Honda2Nismo's Avatar
Honda2Nismo
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
Default

Are you running the vr1 because you're using a ls motor? I looked it up on BITOG and it seems there was some debate on the actual zinc content of oil.

Any input?
Reply
Old May 10, 2011 | 05:59 PM
  #59  
SnyperZ's Avatar
SnyperZ
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 1
From: Connecticut
Default

Theres 2 different versions of the VR-1. The silver bottle is the "street" version of the oil and is okay to use with cats(which means there might be some zinc but not a lot) the black bottled VR-1 says "for race use only" and if you look on the back it specifically says not to use on street cars. Thats because there is a much higher zinc contend and it will destroy your cats over time. I use the black bottle. It was recommended by a local well respected engine builder and many that I know of and Ive been using it for a while with no issues. I guess in the end it comes down to personal preference but I was just sharing my opinion. I run a lot of power through this engine(733 last year on the stock block and over 1k this year on the stroker motor) and the oil has served me well so far.
Reply
Old May 12, 2011 | 07:49 PM
  #60  
kingkai's Avatar
kingkai
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque
Default

Originally Posted by Z1 Performance
It's very difficult to have a thread like this and come out with a cohesive answer. It will be very subjective, based upon the clearances that the engine was set up to during assembly by the builder/machinist. Those clearances are based on a number of factors including the parts used (pistons/rods), the bearings used (stock, aftermarket, if aftermarket, which), and the intended rpm range. This is also why all the UOA results in the world don't tend to reveal much aside from a marketing campaign, unless you have a very, very broad cross section of engines (all prepared the same way) to compare results against. I don't think most failures out there can be traced to one oil being used over another. Tends to be due to just a badly built engine

The best advise is simply go back to your source. Use the oil(s), and viscosity recommended by whomever actually assembled your engine. Not the person who sold you the engine, not the person who sold you the parts, but the person who actually put it together. They will have their own go-to favorites based on the specifics of that engine build.

Not FI, but for my VQ, my machinist made a very specific oil recommendation, and I've stuck by it since completing the break in (2007). Royal Purple XPR 20/50 with a WIX filter. I'm sure there are others that he would be totally fine with me using as well, but this stuff is readily available for me, so it's all I've ever used. If he told me I could run Wolfs Head, or whatever other brand, I'd use it. Ultimately it's his engine, and it's what he is paid to be the expert on. I just follow his directions. 4 years later and the engine runs great, and has not given me any issues. Doesn't use any oil, oil pressure is always consistent no matter what the weather, and I change it every 2500-3000 just because of the rpms I run. Overkill I'm sure, but it's worked, so its just superstitiously what I do.

However, on other engines of mine that he has built, he has had different recommendations...and in some cases (like for our BMW ITS cars), they were always done around being able to use a more 'normal' off the shelf dino (which for us is typically Castrol GTX 10w30, since you can get it anywhere you happen to be). These engines were never exotic internally mind you, they just needed to last at least a seasons worth.

This is THE correct answer IMO. Oil is engine specific based on climate, engine loading and bearing clearances. Which is why no one is answering and all results vary from build to build.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:37 PM.