Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Greddy TT Installed and Running

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 16, 2004 | 12:42 PM
  #21  
etx's Avatar
etx
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 949
Likes: 0
From: Detroit, The Motor City
Default

Anyone installing a turbo kit on your car should know it need a BOV. It's simply not encluded because of legal reasons.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2004 | 01:40 PM
  #22  
12SecZ's Avatar
12SecZ
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,686
Likes: 0
From: NOR - CAL
Default

Nissan is buying me a new bumper, while it is off I am putting a BOV right there where the IC pipe is.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2004 | 03:37 PM
  #23  
JSE350z's Avatar
JSE350z
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Default

shaun_walsh is right though that the Greddy didnt put one on their project car. i went back to the article in turbo mag and i didnt see one and there wasnt a mention of one. i just found it stranged that it wasnt put on and why Greddy thought it wasnt needed
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2004 | 06:17 PM
  #24  
ElvishasaZ's Avatar
ElvishasaZ
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: Memphis
Default

Originally posted by etx
Anyone installing a turbo kit on your car should know it need a BOV. It's simply not encluded because of legal reasons.
what kinda legal reasons? Besides if grddy who desgned it for their car and R & D 'd it why would you think they wouldnt know after-all they made it to be realiable as an aim wouldnt you think?
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2004 | 09:16 PM
  #25  
Steve@Evolution's Avatar
Steve@Evolution
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
Default

I had personally talked to Greddy Tech and they told me the reason they didnot install a bov on their R&D car was because they didn't felt it was needed. That was all they said.
Legal reason is imo if the kit did include one, the kit wouldn't pass CARB exempt approval due to externally vent gases. ( Air/fuel/gas, whatever...)
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2004 | 03:44 AM
  #26  
Guru's Avatar
Guru
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
From: Novi, MI
Default

A BOV only vent compressed air is all. I think the wording in the CARB regulations was just done wrong.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2004 | 08:04 AM
  #27  
Steve@Evolution's Avatar
Steve@Evolution
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
Default

Tell me about it...Government regulation is a B$%#$.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2004 | 01:38 PM
  #28  
phunk's Avatar
phunk
CJ Motorsports
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,997
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
Default

Guru: Depending on what car, the setup, and where in the setup the BOV is... it can ADVERSLY effect emissions. I am sure they would rather just make an externally vented BOV illegal than have to figure out in each cars application if it should be legal or not.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2004 | 02:52 PM
  #29  
mickey's Avatar
mickey
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
From: Ypsilanti, MI.
Default Re: Pics, BOV and Problems

Originally posted by shaun_walsh
Hey Folks,

Pics and Problems - I did not get a chance to take pics becuase the car acted funny Wednesday night going home (about 10pm). I had to take it back in Thursday to have it looked at. I should know what is going on today. So I did not take the pics yet. Sorry.

BOV - Greddy did not reccomend a a BOV and did not put one on their own car so SP and I decided not to put one on.

Stay tuned...

Shaun
Felt this thread got sidetracked with BOV discussion (althought still useful info).
I am curious about how shaun_walsh's turbo is doing. Any updates, pics, causes of turbo not running properly?

Rgd,
Mickey
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2004 | 03:10 PM
  #30  
r34 racer's Avatar
r34 racer
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 3
From: Huntington Beach, CA
Default

Originally posted by phunk
Guru: Depending on what car, the setup, and where in the setup the BOV is... it can ADVERSLY effect emissions. I am sure they would rather just make an externally vented BOV illegal than have to figure out in each cars application if it should be legal or not.
A properly placed BOV will NOT adversely effect emissions. If the BOV is placed after the MAF sensor, the ECU will never know when metered air is being vented, and thus will unknowingly increase/keep steady the injectors' duty cycles instead of lowering them, because for all it knows it still needs to combust fuel with the air that has vented and left the intake tract. This creates an overly rich condition every time the throttle is released from load, and causes the fireballs out the exhausts. If the BOV is placed before the MAF (or after the MAF with vented air being recirculated back into the intake tract via a tube) the ECU will have a MUCH more accurate measure of how much air is in the system, and nothing bad should happen to emissions.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2004 | 03:21 PM
  #31  
Steve@Evolution's Avatar
Steve@Evolution
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
Default Re: Re: Pics, BOV and Problems

but the point is.... externally vented BOV is illegal with C.A.R.B.
Let's get back to the original subject.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2004 | 04:03 PM
  #32  
phunk's Avatar
phunk
CJ Motorsports
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,997
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
Default

Originally posted by r34 racer
A properly placed BOV will NOT adversely effect emissions. If the BOV is placed after the MAF sensor, the ECU will never know when metered air is being vented, and thus will unknowingly increase/keep steady the injectors' duty cycles instead of lowering them, because for all it knows it still needs to combust fuel with the air that has vented and left the intake tract. This creates an overly rich condition every time the throttle is released from load, and causes the fireballs out the exhausts. If the BOV is placed before the MAF (or after the MAF with vented air being recirculated back into the intake tract via a tube) the ECU will have a MUCH more accurate measure of how much air is in the system, and nothing bad should happen to emissions.
i am extremely aware of how it works.

please reread my post as i never said that it couldnt be done to not have a strong impact on emissions. I said "Depending on what car, the setup, and where in the setup the BOV is... it can "

... they arent going to want to inspect everyones BOV to make sure they installed it in a enviromentally sound way... and BTW... MOST turbos cars with BOVs DO get the negative effects, no cars from the factory boost thru the MAF... so this is like the only exception.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2004 | 05:10 PM
  #33  
VeilSdeGTO's Avatar
VeilSdeGTO
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: California
Default Re: total cost

Originally posted by shaun_walsh
10,500

TT
Gauges and stuff
Install
Can I ask who did the install and how long it took?
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2004 | 07:10 PM
  #34  
shaun_walsh's Avatar
shaun_walsh
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
From: Wildomar CA
Default Install and issues

Greetings,

The install was done by SP Engineering (www.sp-power.com). The key engineer they want to look at my car was out until this Monday (1/19) so I should know more for sure on Monday or Tuseday. I will let you know. Sorry for the dealys, but I can only go as fast as they tell me things.

Shaun
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2004 | 07:04 AM
  #35  
VeilSdeGTO's Avatar
VeilSdeGTO
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

Your car is being worked on in the City of Industry? Thats funny because I was just considering them for some work on an install. My parents live about 20 minutes from them.

Let me know when you find out more info. Thanks!
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2004 | 05:35 PM
  #36  
shaun_walsh's Avatar
shaun_walsh
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
From: Wildomar CA
Default back and Running

First,

I want to thank the guys (John and Eugene) at SP Engineering for all of their help in getting things done right. The problem turned out to be a bad fuel injector on cylinder #5. They spent two extra days of mechanic time at no cost to me to take it apart and put it back together running tests.

Second,

The car is running great and the Dyno came back at 352 RWHP and 323 torque. My base line before the upgrade was 246 RWHP and 242 torque.

Third,

I am trying to post pics with this, I hope it works. I have never had one of my pics load.

Shaun
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2004 | 05:49 PM
  #37  
zland's Avatar
zland
Sponsor
Sport Z Magazine
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,086
Likes: 48
From: Oceanside Ca
Default

Great news Shaun!
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2004 | 05:57 PM
  #38  
350Now's Avatar
350Now
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,368
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
Default

Great news pics when you can...
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2004 | 06:32 PM
  #39  
daking350's Avatar
daking350
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,661
Likes: 0
From: east coast
Default

Thats pretty strange..A bad fuel injector, thats not to common on a newer car...Did they say what the problem was with the fuel injector and was it a Greddy injector???
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2004 | 07:13 PM
  #40  
shaun_walsh's Avatar
shaun_walsh
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
From: Wildomar CA
Default Injector and Picutres

Hey,

The injector was one of the new ones that came with the Greddy kit. They also found out that the injector clip was rubbing against the fuel pump and they had to move things a bit and they "shaved" the clip a bit to stop the rubbing on the fuel pump.

I am still having trouble with the picutres. The picutre my camera is taking come out to about 600K. How do folks get the size down?

Shaun
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:31 PM.