Greddy TT: New Dyno numbers at 5psi and 6psi with Evo2 Exhuast
04-18-2004, 07:46 PM
#23
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: STL, MO
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have been thinking on what exhuast to get being that it is my next add on... I am still debating wether or not to get the Greddy TT, since it will be my first turbo in any vehicle yet.. been with off road vehicles in the past...
I am, however, really leaning toward getting the TT, that is when i get the money, but I have the money for exhuast at the moment and was just wondering how well the EVO 2 exhuast will run with non F/I. Will it still get an average gain as of aftermarket exhuast? I do know it was made for the TT specifically, but just wondering if i were to get it, how my car would run until I was able to install the TT. Thanks for the input ahead of time
I am, however, really leaning toward getting the TT, that is when i get the money, but I have the money for exhuast at the moment and was just wondering how well the EVO 2 exhuast will run with non F/I. Will it still get an average gain as of aftermarket exhuast? I do know it was made for the TT specifically, but just wondering if i were to get it, how my car would run until I was able to install the TT. Thanks for the input ahead of time
04-18-2004, 08:01 PM
#24
Originally posted by N4Spd
gq_model_626,
what side is your AEM plumbed to?
what side was the tailpipe sensor plumbed to?
thanks,
rob
gq_model_626,
what side is your AEM plumbed to?
what side was the tailpipe sensor plumbed to?
thanks,
rob
04-18-2004, 08:05 PM
#25
Originally posted by ZainT
I have been thinking on what exhuast to get being that it is my next add on... I am still debating wether or not to get the Greddy TT, since it will be my first turbo in any vehicle yet.. been with off road vehicles in the past...
I am, however, really leaning toward getting the TT, that is when i get the money, but I have the money for exhuast at the moment and was just wondering how well the EVO 2 exhuast will run with non F/I. Will it still get an average gain as of aftermarket exhuast? I do know it was made for the TT specifically, but just wondering if i were to get it, how my car would run until I was able to install the TT. Thanks for the input ahead of time
I have been thinking on what exhuast to get being that it is my next add on... I am still debating wether or not to get the Greddy TT, since it will be my first turbo in any vehicle yet.. been with off road vehicles in the past...
I am, however, really leaning toward getting the TT, that is when i get the money, but I have the money for exhuast at the moment and was just wondering how well the EVO 2 exhuast will run with non F/I. Will it still get an average gain as of aftermarket exhuast? I do know it was made for the TT specifically, but just wondering if i were to get it, how my car would run until I was able to install the TT. Thanks for the input ahead of time
04-19-2004, 08:15 AM
#26
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Naples, FL
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Very nice GG!
I have some sound clips, and video's of the EVo'2 at the bottom of this page
http://www.autocarparts.com/project_350Z.php3
Originally posted by etx
How does it sound?
How does it sound?
http://www.autocarparts.com/project_350Z.php3
04-19-2004, 08:02 PM
#28
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by spz33
is there a dyno sheet with Air/Fuel print out??? I would like to see if you don't mind showing.
is there a dyno sheet with Air/Fuel print out??? I would like to see if you don't mind showing.
Originally posted by spz33
A/F readings i'm sorry are for in house use only. I can tell you that the reading is really really rich. I'm sorry for the mixup, the car was at 8.8lbs of boost. It is a dynojet. Thanks for looking.
A/F readings i'm sorry are for in house use only. I can tell you that the reading is really really rich. I'm sorry for the mixup, the car was at 8.8lbs of boost. It is a dynojet. Thanks for looking.
Originally posted by spz33
I would like to show everyone the graph just to prove we didn't lean the car out, but I won't. It's pointless. I"m not trying to say our tuning is "better" than yours. I was simply stating what we acheived with what the car had on it at the time of dyno. People are fast to jump to conclusions. We have been tuning cars for years now statisfying our customers with their needs of having power. For those of you that would like the same, feel free to give us a call.
I would like to show everyone the graph just to prove we didn't lean the car out, but I won't. It's pointless. I"m not trying to say our tuning is "better" than yours. I was simply stating what we acheived with what the car had on it at the time of dyno. People are fast to jump to conclusions. We have been tuning cars for years now statisfying our customers with their needs of having power. For those of you that would like the same, feel free to give us a call.
04-19-2004, 08:03 PM
#29
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Chicago Burbs
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
nice numbers.
when are you going to tune it? remember you can blow an engine because of being too rich. (rich detonation) trust me, one of my injectors got stuck wide open and i blew a ring from running too rich
when are you going to tune it? remember you can blow an engine because of being too rich. (rich detonation) trust me, one of my injectors got stuck wide open and i blew a ring from running too rich
04-19-2004, 09:35 PM
#30
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by mr2fasterthanyo
nice numbers.
when are you going to tune it? remember you can blow an engine because of being too rich. (rich detonation) trust me, one of my injectors got stuck wide open and i blew a ring from running too rich
nice numbers.
when are you going to tune it? remember you can blow an engine because of being too rich. (rich detonation) trust me, one of my injectors got stuck wide open and i blew a ring from running too rich
04-20-2004, 11:04 AM
#32
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well for someone who was SOOooo concerned about showing something as usless as an AFR chart on 104-octane and then asking for ANYONE to show you their chart is pretty lame. Plus, the fact that you just came to brag, rub noses, and not answer any questions is just asinine.
Why come here to post/brag, since you're clearly not here to SHARE any information? It's pointless unless you're here strictly to advertise your "experienced" tuning abilities(on 104-octane no less).
Why come here to post/brag, since you're clearly not here to SHARE any information? It's pointless unless you're here strictly to advertise your "experienced" tuning abilities(on 104-octane no less).
Originally posted by spz33
Well for someone who wanted so bad as to see our dyno sheet, he didn't even want to show his own? What's up with that?
Well for someone who wanted so bad as to see our dyno sheet, he didn't even want to show his own? What's up with that?
04-20-2004, 12:20 PM
#33
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
GQ posted the link to his Dyno and A/F ratio on the 1st page:
"Here is my dyno sheet. Don't forget...the tail-pipe dyno reading was not accurate...ignore the lean condition at on the graph. My AEM wideband was pinned at 11.5:1 beyond 6000rpm.
350NOW....go ahead and post yours as well. I don't mind the hijack!
http://www.savepic.com/is.php?i=536...nd_Evo2_Ext.jpg"
"Here is my dyno sheet. Don't forget...the tail-pipe dyno reading was not accurate...ignore the lean condition at on the graph. My AEM wideband was pinned at 11.5:1 beyond 6000rpm.
350NOW....go ahead and post yours as well. I don't mind the hijack!
http://www.savepic.com/is.php?i=536...nd_Evo2_Ext.jpg"
04-20-2004, 12:24 PM
#34
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: So Cal
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am here to answer anyones questions that they may have. Just because I can't post the dyno chart with A/F means I don't want to help? Where did you get that from? Who here have come and asked for help and we have not helped you? If that's the case, then I will apologize for it personally. I have not turned down anyone who has called or e-mailed me/us.
04-20-2004, 01:01 PM
#35
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I asked TWICE why you guys SAE correct on a FI car and also if you could post the SAE correction factor or uncorrected numbers.
Also, I asked if this was a track only car or something you turned down the boost and ran on pump gas maps also.
I don't care anymore about the A/F chart. I was curious at first to see what a 104-octane AFR curve looked like, but 104-octane isn't practical anyways.
Also, I asked if this was a track only car or something you turned down the boost and ran on pump gas maps also.
I don't care anymore about the A/F chart. I was curious at first to see what a 104-octane AFR curve looked like, but 104-octane isn't practical anyways.
Originally posted by spz33
I am here to answer anyones questions that they may have. Just because I can't post the dyno chart with A/F means I don't want to help? Where did you get that from? Who here have come and asked for help and we have not helped you? If that's the case, then I will apologize for it personally. I have not turned down anyone who has called or e-mailed me/us.
I am here to answer anyones questions that they may have. Just because I can't post the dyno chart with A/F means I don't want to help? Where did you get that from? Who here have come and asked for help and we have not helped you? If that's the case, then I will apologize for it personally. I have not turned down anyone who has called or e-mailed me/us.
04-20-2004, 02:57 PM
#36
IceY2K1Max...I am tracking with ya...and laughing. 
350Now, the danger of blowing your motor on a rich condition is EXTREMELY unlikely....especially not at 10:1 or higher...which is close to where you are. The Greddy kit in stock trim is in no danger..
To your point, I think turning the boost up slightly to 5.5-6.0psi would help things. Remember that the Greddy kit is factory set to .40-.45 bar, so that means 5.6-6.3psi...roughly.
350Now, the danger of blowing your motor on a rich condition is EXTREMELY unlikely....especially not at 10:1 or higher...which is close to where you are. The Greddy kit in stock trim is in no danger..
To your point, I think turning the boost up slightly to 5.5-6.0psi would help things. Remember that the Greddy kit is factory set to .40-.45 bar, so that means 5.6-6.3psi...roughly.
05-05-2004, 05:11 PM
#37
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: So Cal
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by IceY2K1Max
I asked TWICE why you guys SAE correct on a FI car and also if you could post the SAE correction factor or uncorrected numbers.
Also, I asked if this was a track only car or something you turned down the boost and ran on pump gas maps also.
I don't care anymore about the A/F chart. I was curious at first to see what a 104-octane AFR curve looked like, but 104-octane isn't practical anyways.
I asked TWICE why you guys SAE correct on a FI car and also if you could post the SAE correction factor or uncorrected numbers.
Also, I asked if this was a track only car or something you turned down the boost and ran on pump gas maps also.
I don't care anymore about the A/F chart. I was curious at first to see what a 104-octane AFR curve looked like, but 104-octane isn't practical anyways.
We always SAE correct for any cars we dyno. I can do uncorrected for you if that will make you feel better. It's just our preference.
No, this is not a track car. This is a customer who drives his car pretty much everyday. Yeah, it's not practical, but that's what he wanted. If you like, I can probably show you the same dyno, but uncorrected. Still waiting to see your dyno sheet GQ..where is it?
05-06-2004, 07:12 AM
#39
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No problem...I understand you're busy.
Yes, if you wouldn't mind, post the uncorrected graph or at least the Correction Factor so I can do it myself. I'm pretty sure where you guys are located that it's not much of a difference, but it's still necessary to compare apples-to-apples with other FI cars.
Still can't believe dyno shops are using SAE correction on FI cars.
Yes, if you wouldn't mind, post the uncorrected graph or at least the Correction Factor so I can do it myself. I'm pretty sure where you guys are located that it's not much of a difference, but it's still necessary to compare apples-to-apples with other FI cars.
Still can't believe dyno shops are using SAE correction on FI cars.
Originally posted by spz33
Sorry, been busy but here you go:
We always SAE correct for any cars we dyno. I can do uncorrected for you if that will make you feel better. It's just our preference.
No, this is not a track car. This is a customer who drives his car pretty much everyday. Yeah, it's not practical, but that's what he wanted. If you like, I can probably show you the same dyno, but uncorrected. Still waiting to see your dyno sheet GQ..where is it?
Sorry, been busy but here you go:
We always SAE correct for any cars we dyno. I can do uncorrected for you if that will make you feel better. It's just our preference.
No, this is not a track car. This is a customer who drives his car pretty much everyday. Yeah, it's not practical, but that's what he wanted. If you like, I can probably show you the same dyno, but uncorrected. Still waiting to see your dyno sheet GQ..where is it?
