35th Anniv. Intake revisions!
#2
Re: 35th Anniv. Intake revisions!
Originally posted by Diesel350
I just read in SCC that they tweaked the 350z intake to get more HP out of the 350. Does anyone know exactly what they did and if we can transfer that to our regular 350s?
I just read in SCC that they tweaked the 350z intake to get more HP out of the 350. Does anyone know exactly what they did and if we can transfer that to our regular 350s?
#3
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: South Texas
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 35th Anniv. Intake revisions!
Originally posted by Diesel350
I just read in SCC that they tweaked the 350z intake to get more HP out of the 350. Does anyone know exactly what they did and if we can transfer that to our regular 350s?
I just read in SCC that they tweaked the 350z intake to get more HP out of the 350. Does anyone know exactly what they did and if we can transfer that to our regular 350s?
#7
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: South Texas
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Tony@Performance
That would include the new intake pipe and MAF I would think....
That would include the new intake pipe and MAF I would think....
Trending Topics
#9
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: san luis obispo, ca
Posts: 1,580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by stx
I have been looking all over for the MAF and intake pipe. Can you get them? If so how much?
I have been looking all over for the MAF and intake pipe. Can you get them? If so how much?
#11
Registered User
iTrader: (41)
Re: 35th Anniv. Intake revisions!
Originally posted by Diesel350
I just read in SCC that they tweaked the 350z intake to get more HP out of the 350. Does anyone know exactly what they did and if we can transfer that to our regular 350s?
I just read in SCC that they tweaked the 350z intake to get more HP out of the 350. Does anyone know exactly what they did and if we can transfer that to our regular 350s?
#14
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: South Texas
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by zluver
I second that opinion, but you guys should also see there is a loss in overall peak torque
I second that opinion, but you guys should also see there is a loss in overall peak torque
#16
Vendor - Former Vendor
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The only thing that Nissan did was make the intake manifold runners shorter, which resulted in the increase of horse power and higher redline. Doing so also resulted in the lose of torque in the bottom end.
#17
Turbo Whore
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: West suburbs of Chi-town
Posts: 7,303
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally posted by BLine
The only thing that Nissan did was make the intake manifold runners shorter, which resulted in the increase of horse power and higher redline. Doing so also resulted in the lose of torque in the bottom end.
The only thing that Nissan did was make the intake manifold runners shorter, which resulted in the increase of horse power and higher redline. Doing so also resulted in the lose of torque in the bottom end.
#18
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by BriGuyMax
they also changed out the pistons...and added CVTC to the exhaust side of the valvetrain and I believe changed out the cams.
they also changed out the pistons...and added CVTC to the exhaust side of the valvetrain and I believe changed out the cams.
#20
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: san luis obispo, ca
Posts: 1,580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by maserom
SCC is not an accurate source of information. Always refer to the pr site.
SCC is not an accurate source of information. Always refer to the pr site.