FYI.....under development.....350EVO COMPLETE Intake manifold
#21
#26
Yes .....the list is long all ready.
Kepp in mind this is a project that will invovle some serious R&D......we are not just going to bang it out. IT will take a bit of time.
BJ@350EVO.com
Kepp in mind this is a project that will invovle some serious R&D......we are not just going to bang it out. IT will take a bit of time.
BJ@350EVO.com
#27
Originally Posted by dwnshift
Yes .....the list is long all ready.
Kepp in mind this is a project that will invovle some serious R&D......we are not just going to bang it out. IT will take a bit of time.
BJ@350EVO.com
Kepp in mind this is a project that will invovle some serious R&D......we are not just going to bang it out. IT will take a bit of time.
BJ@350EVO.com
#28
Originally Posted by turbo-maxima
why are making a whole new lower manifold? Why dont you saw off the lower manifold halfway , and throw some IDB's on there. The stock lower intake manifold flows pretty good, only the upper needs some improvement.
#30
Originally Posted by turbo-maxima
why are making a whole new lower manifold? Why dont you saw off the lower manifold halfway , and throw some IDB's on there. The stock lower intake manifold flows pretty good, only the upper needs some improvement.
#31
Changing the runner length and size has it rewards and so does the volume that the runners feed from(plenum).
I guess one way to look at it is....... if you are sucking air through a coffee stirrer..... changing the size of the glass isnt that big of a change....you are still sucking through the coffee straw.
Just boring the intake runners out may not be the best solution either so this is where runner length comes into play.
Its going to be the total package that nets the bigger rewards.
Individual T bodies would require going to Pectel/EFI/Motec or Bosch style engine mang. and yes that would make some reall good gains.
Cheers
BJ@350EVO.com
I guess one way to look at it is....... if you are sucking air through a coffee stirrer..... changing the size of the glass isnt that big of a change....you are still sucking through the coffee straw.
Just boring the intake runners out may not be the best solution either so this is where runner length comes into play.
Its going to be the total package that nets the bigger rewards.
Individual T bodies would require going to Pectel/EFI/Motec or Bosch style engine mang. and yes that would make some reall good gains.
Cheers
BJ@350EVO.com
#35
BJ,
I think you should go for the whole smash and develop a variable runner intake for us. I wonder if we could modify the BMW system
I think you should go for the whole smash and develop a variable runner intake for us. I wonder if we could modify the BMW system
Originally Posted by dwnshift
Changing the runner length and size has it rewards and so does the volume that the runners feed from(plenum).
I guess one way to look at it is....... if you are sucking air through a coffee stirrer..... changing the size of the glass isnt that big of a change....you are still sucking through the coffee straw.
Just boring the intake runners out may not be the best solution either so this is where runner length comes into play.
Its going to be the total package that nets the bigger rewards.
Individual T bodies would require going to Pectel/EFI/Motec or Bosch style engine mang. and yes that would make some reall good gains.
Cheers
BJ@350EVO.com
I guess one way to look at it is....... if you are sucking air through a coffee stirrer..... changing the size of the glass isnt that big of a change....you are still sucking through the coffee straw.
Just boring the intake runners out may not be the best solution either so this is where runner length comes into play.
Its going to be the total package that nets the bigger rewards.
Individual T bodies would require going to Pectel/EFI/Motec or Bosch style engine mang. and yes that would make some reall good gains.
Cheers
BJ@350EVO.com
#36
Originally Posted by jreiter
IDB? Like independent throttle bodies? I believe this came up a long time ago, since there is a Tommy Kaira (sp?) 350Z with that. However, the throttle control system would have to be redone... like an entire new ECU to handle 6 throttle bodies rather than one. Ouch.
#40
Sounds excellent. I am also intrigued by the IDB setup as I've seen this on alot of the Best Motoring NA cars, is cost a prohibitive factor to this? And would the gains substantiate the cost? Anyways, if 350EVO makes this a reasonably priced setup I'll gladly fork over the cash... 20HP at least sounds nice but is this going to be at peak or an ALL AROUND gain? In other words will this, potentially, pull better numbers than the crawford cast plenum (claimed 20 hp at peak)?
Oh ya... Subcribing
Oh ya... Subcribing