Holy Sh**, Borla + test pipes
All I can say is wow. I just got my resonated test pipes installed with the non fouler to help the cel. No cel, no rasp and holy crap the sound is awsome. When I got the Borla TD my first impression was nice but not what I thought. I installed the test pipes and now its very deep and still pretty quite while on the highway. I'm deff in love. Now my car sounds absolutely sick. so now I gotta go drive around some more. oh yah and I can feel an increase from the butt dyno.
Originally Posted by thegr8one99
All I can say is wow. I just got my resonated test pipes installed with the non fouler to help the cel. No cel, no rasp and holy crap the sound is awsome. When I got the Borla TD my first impression was nice but not what I thought. I installed the test pipes and now its very deep and still pretty quite while on the highway. I'm deff in love. Now my car sounds absolutely sick. so now I gotta go drive around some more. oh yah and I can feel an increase from the butt dyno.
Originally Posted by DG350Z
I also have a borla. Can anyone tell me the difference between the gains from Crawford HFC or test pipes (and sound difference)? Is it worth the smell / emissions?
its been about 1 1/2 month
Originally Posted by thegr8one99
All I can say is wow. I just got my resonated test pipes installed with the non fouler to help the cel. No cel, no rasp and holy crap the sound is awsome. When I got the Borla TD my first impression was nice but not what I thought. I installed the test pipes and now its very deep and still pretty quite while on the highway. I'm deff in love. Now my car sounds absolutely sick. so now I gotta go drive around some more. oh yah and I can feel an increase from the butt dyno.
But really I wish i had a digi cam so i could post up with the sound in action.
Anyone in Northern Cali (Bay Area) that wants to do that with me let me know. It does sound pretty darn good.
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by RBALDINELLII
Which resonated test pipes did you go with?
Originally Posted by DG350Z
I also have a borla. Can anyone tell me the difference between the gains from Crawford HFC or test pipes (and sound difference)? Is it worth the smell / emissions?
Originally Posted by DG350Z
I also have a borla. Can anyone tell me the difference between the gains from Crawford HFC or test pipes (and sound difference)? Is it worth the smell / emissions?
350Z drivers have experienced similar results with headers.
Originally Posted by davidv
Test pipes may pick-up a couple of more peak horsepower than high-flow catalytic converters. The disadvantage of test pipes is that you may lose a couple of pounds of torque at the low end.
350Z drivers have experienced similar results with headers.
350Z drivers have experienced similar results with headers.
Originally Posted by pln2311
Do your test pipes produce a gas smell inside the vehicle? I've heard a lot of people have complained about this.
Originally Posted by scarface9
Difference between HFC and TP is minimal, about 1-2 HP's. I have the Crawford cats and love the combination with the borla.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





