K&N or pop-charger
I know the gains are close to the same as far as these two intakes go. Are they both short ram?? I keep seeing an extra tube coming down from the K&N. Is it CAI or not?? Which one should I get from a performance stand point?? I think the K&N looks better even though it is more expensive. What do yall think??
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by MurphysZ
Look at how many people have a popchrager vs. K&N. Popcharger is the best bang for the buck.
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 0
From: so cali 909-951-626
It would be really hard to notice any real difference in power between these two intakes.
I would recomend the JWT simply due to the cheaper price. They both are washable/re-useable.
The JWT is the best selling intake I think for the 350Z, and that is what I use on my car....
I would recomend the JWT simply due to the cheaper price. They both are washable/re-useable.
The JWT is the best selling intake I think for the 350Z, and that is what I use on my car....
davidv I'm having trouble figuring out exactly what's going on with your intake.
So it has a front-mount scoop + tube that gets air into the general box region of the filter, then the filter and intake tube suck the air into the engine?
So, how well sealed is the box where the filter resides? like, does air from other parts of the engine bay bleed into the box or is it sealed off pretty well?
Intakes like this probably don't do much on a dyno since the car is stationary... I bet the performance is much better when driving...
So it has a front-mount scoop + tube that gets air into the general box region of the filter, then the filter and intake tube suck the air into the engine?
So, how well sealed is the box where the filter resides? like, does air from other parts of the engine bay bleed into the box or is it sealed off pretty well?
Intakes like this probably don't do much on a dyno since the car is stationary... I bet the performance is much better when driving...






