Notices
Intake Exhaust Moving all that air in and out efficiently

Popcharger or AEM CIA?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 27, 2006 | 07:27 AM
  #1  
drich350z's Avatar
drich350z
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: North Royalton, OH
Default Popcharger or AEM CIA?

Popcharger or AEM CIA? Any insight would be appreciated. Looking for simplicity of installation, sound, and noticeable hp gains? Thanks.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2006 | 07:31 AM
  #2  
Robert_K's Avatar
Robert_K
Didn't Go Cheap
Premier Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 12,390
Likes: 101
From: Spring, TX
Default

Start here: https://my350z.com/forum/search.php
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2006 | 07:47 AM
  #3  
kpiskin's Avatar
kpiskin
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,060
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach
Default

Reply
Old Apr 27, 2006 | 07:47 AM
  #4  
davidv's Avatar
davidv
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 42,753
Likes: 11
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

Welcome.

Many common questions can be answered by looking in the correct forum. Look at the two intakes. One is completely under the hood. The other routes the filter behind the bumper.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2006 | 11:32 AM
  #5  
ANXIOUZ's Avatar
ANXIOUZ
New Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,775
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
Default

I've had both...

simplicity of installation
* Popcharger goes right in using stock tubing. AEM requires it's own tubing so everything stock has to come out. There was some finesse to get the filter in place as well. I didn't need to jack my car but it was tricky.

sound
* AEM sounds way better to me. Much louder at WOT and more agressive. The JWT pretty much just gives you a little "pssst" sucking noise when you accelerate.

noticeable hp gains
* Neither. The JWT seems to have the best "proven" gains of like 4-6HP but you won't really notice any difference in the car's performance with either intake. It's just the sound that you'll notice.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2006 | 11:36 AM
  #6  
SBT's Avatar
SBT
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
From: Fairfield, NJ
Default

ive heard both and i think the popcharger sounds better...its obviously subjective. i went with the popcharger for its proven power gains and ease of install/changing it out if i want to go back stock or forced induction.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2006 | 12:57 PM
  #7  
first350's Avatar
first350
Registered User
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,947
Likes: 0
From: NewCastle, WA
Default

Originally Posted by maximXL
I've had both...

simplicity of installation
* Popcharger goes right in using stock tubing. AEM requires it's own tubing so everything stock has to come out. There was some finesse to get the filter in place as well. I didn't need to jack my car but it was tricky.

sound
* AEM sounds way better to me. Much louder at WOT and more agressive. The JWT pretty much just gives you a little "pssst" sucking noise when you accelerate.

noticeable hp gains
* Neither. The JWT seems to have the best "proven" gains of like 4-6HP but you won't really notice any difference in the car's performance with either intake. It's just the sound that you'll notice.

+1 on AEM sounding better
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2006 | 01:26 PM
  #8  
OCG35Coupe's Avatar
OCG35Coupe
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
From: Orange County CA
Default

The Popcharger works better with future induction mods like a spacer, new upper plenum, or moddified lower plenum.

Long Tube CAI's are no good when combined with other induction mods.

So i say Popcharger, or just get a aftermarket drop-in replacement filter like a K&N, Blitz, Nismo, Amsoil, or Green Air Filter.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2006 | 10:09 PM
  #9  
bacalhau16's Avatar
bacalhau16
Registered User
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,148
Likes: 0
From: dartmouth
Default

AEM's doesnt produce any more proven gains, and even still, perhaps if it did make 2-3 more hp, just look at the price difference between the two, and ease of installation, then decide if its still worth it.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 12:28 AM
  #10  
brigz's Avatar
brigz
Registered User
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
From: Vallej7o7
Default

Which is louder at WOT? Just wondering due to one being in a small space in the bumper and the other in the engine bay
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 12:42 AM
  #11  
NissanZfan's Avatar
NissanZfan
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 0
From: BayArea
Default

Originally Posted by maximXL
I've had both...

simplicity of installation
* Popcharger goes right in using stock tubing. AEM requires it's own tubing so everything stock has to come out. There was some finesse to get the filter in place as well. I didn't need to jack my car but it was tricky.

sound
* AEM sounds way better to me. Much louder at WOT and more agressive. The JWT pretty much just gives you a little "pssst" sucking noise when you accelerate.

noticeable hp gains
* Neither. The JWT seems to have the best "proven" gains of like 4-6HP but you won't really notice any difference in the car's performance with either intake. It's just the sound that you'll notice.

I don’t agree with you fully. I’m not just saying this because I am a pop charger owner. Half throttle you can hear a psssst but after 4k at WOT it growls, and sounds a lot more aggressive.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 01:01 AM
  #12  
Zincognito's Avatar
Zincognito
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,793
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

Having installed AEM and JWT's ill have to say that the popcharger is obviously the easiest to install, hands down. Plus its the best performing intake out there AND its cheap?? Come on now, you pick!

G
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 01:29 AM
  #13  
Dubai's Avatar
Dubai
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 0
From: Dubai, UAE
Default

save your money and get the popcharger!!
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 01:37 AM
  #14  
Quijano187's Avatar
Quijano187
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 636
Likes: 0
From: Long island / PA
Default

please just save your money !!!
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 08:52 AM
  #16  
GMZ's Avatar
GMZ
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,896
Likes: 0
From: Cali Expatriate
Default

I just put in my Popcharger this weekend at the same time as my Nismo Catback. I looked so damn foolish hanging my head out the window trying to hear it!! But I could while inside, took about 20 min to install, my sister could have done it I think. Does sound really nice in the upper RPM's. Oh and its alot cheaper than AEM
Reply
Old May 1, 2006 | 07:37 AM
  #17  
ANXIOUZ's Avatar
ANXIOUZ
New Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,775
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
Default

Originally Posted by racinzrookie
Which is louder at WOT? Just wondering due to one being in a small space in the bumper and the other in the engine bay
AEM. It's not the filter that's louder...it's the tubing. The sucking noise is more noticable and louder with the JWT but at WOT the aggressive sound is more pronounced with the AEM.

Originally Posted by NissanZfan
I don’t agree with you fully. I’m not just saying this because I am a pop charger owner. Half throttle you can hear a psssst but after 4k at WOT it growls, and sounds a lot more aggressive.
Totally. I don't disagree. My point was more that when both are compared at WOT, the AEM is louder overall. Let me put it this way...when I installed my Borla exhaust the AEM was still WAY loud at WOT.

When I then popped in the JWT, I began to hear my exhaust at WOT.
Reply
Old May 1, 2006 | 08:30 AM
  #18  
Robert_K's Avatar
Robert_K
Didn't Go Cheap
Premier Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 12,390
Likes: 101
From: Spring, TX
Default

Can't believe everyone is talking about the sound of an intake over performance.
Reply
Old May 1, 2006 | 08:09 PM
  #19  
SLoG35's Avatar
SLoG35
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
From: Houston/galveston
Default

haha... im planning on buyin my pop charger pretty soon....as well as the Motordyne 1/2" Iso Thermal plenum spacer with the Iso Thermal components, Aramid Gasket and the Polarized Copper TB heater. just a lil worried about warranty...sorry for being off topic
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bcoffee20
Zs & Gs For Sale
5
Nov 19, 2015 06:39 PM
350Shadow
NorCal Marketplace
0
Sep 22, 2015 08:30 AM
juang20
Intake
1
Sep 7, 2015 05:37 PM
ndelgro
Mid-Atlantic Marketplace
0
Sep 7, 2015 04:11 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:10 AM.