Speed Force Racing Intake...
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington, NC
I'm considering buying the Speed Force Racing intake. Does anyone have any experience with it.
http://www.speedforceracing.com/prod...y_g35imani.php
http://www.speedforceracing.com/prod...y_g35imani.php
It looks really cool, and I remember seeing this a while back in a thread while it was in development I do believe. The only thing that worries me is the way the throttle body is positioned straight down behind the radiator. Seems to me like you would have to have some crazy intake pipe bends to fit that setup, and I wonder if it would actually gain any power.
Last edited by jmckuhen; Aug 2, 2006 at 11:21 AM.
https://my350z.com/forum/showthread....d+force+racing
The thread kinda died a few months ago, but here it is in all its glory. I would love to hear from Tim that this thing has been tested and gains power.
Vince
The thread kinda died a few months ago, but here it is in all its glory. I would love to hear from Tim that this thing has been tested and gains power.
Vince
Trending Topics
FYI, while the stock intake manifold looks ugly, it achieves over 110% effiency at certain parts of the rev range. A lot of engineering went into the stock design. I highly doubt all these other companies engineering manifolds are putting them on flow benches, calculating laminar flow through out the rev range, etc. We've already seen the poor outcomes of the SSR manifold on NA VQ35s.
Originally Posted by Dave B
FYI, while the stock intake manifold looks ugly, it achieves over 110% effiency at certain parts of the rev range. A lot of engineering went into the stock design. I highly doubt all these other companies engineering manifolds are putting them on flow benches, calculating laminar flow through out the rev range, etc. We've already seen the poor outcomes of the SSR manifold on NA VQ35s.
+1 Dave B (psst.. whuts up? same dave from .orgy?)
Originally Posted by Dave B
FYI, while the stock intake manifold looks ugly, it achieves over 110% effiency at certain parts of the rev range. A lot of engineering went into the stock design. I highly doubt all these other companies engineering manifolds are putting them on flow benches, calculating laminar flow through out the rev range, etc. We've already seen the poor outcomes of the SSR manifold on NA VQ35s.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





