MREV2 + 5/16 Spacer DYNO
01-01-2008, 01:50 PM
#42
Originally Posted by RBlover69
im still confused, ....isnt this ment to be used alone without a mrev2??
EDIT: Oh hell, here you go.
Last edited by undrgnd; 01-01-2008 at 02:05 PM.
01-01-2008, 02:47 PM
#44
So if a revup that was stock was racing a revup with mrev2 and spacer, if everything was magically the same - driver skill, shift point, conditions, the one with the mrev2 and spacer should be further ahead at all points of the race even though the revup has a higher rwhp peak because of the amount of power the mrev2 and spacer produce under the curve? Also, Tony, I sent you a pm 
01-01-2008, 03:08 PM
#45
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 3kgtslflip
So if a revup that was stock was racing a revup with mrev2 and spacer, if everything was magically the same - driver skill, shift point, conditions, the one with the mrev2 and spacer should be further ahead at all points of the race even though the revup has a higher rwhp peak because of the amount of power the mrev2 and spacer produce under the curve? Also, Tony, I sent you a pm
01-01-2008, 03:35 PM
#46
Originally Posted by RBlover69
tanks, though do you feel you beenfited with both on or what would be your thought with just the tallboy on a stock lower plenum.
Having said that, I will be swapping out the APS/MREV2 combo in favor of the Cosworth shortly.
01-01-2008, 03:42 PM
#47
Originally Posted by 3kgtslflip
So if a revup that was stock was racing a revup with mrev2 and spacer, if everything was magically the same - driver skill, shift point, conditions, the one with the mrev2 and spacer should be further ahead at all points of the race even though the revup has a higher rwhp peak because of the amount of power the mrev2 and spacer produce under the curve? Also, Tony, I sent you a pm
Peak numbers are meaningless except maybe to a dyno junkie. Average power per gear, or area under the curve, is all that matters to acceleration.
01-02-2008, 06:18 AM
#48
Originally Posted by undrgnd
The MREV2 makes the car more useable for my purposes, I don't race or rev up high too often. The spacer (or larger upper plenum) by itself has not shown to be a big hp getter on the revups. I understood that Nissan had corrected the starvation to the two front cylinders problem on the revup, so the MREV2 + spacer is the ticket.
Having said that, I will be swapping out the APS/MREV2 combo in favor of the Cosworth shortly.
Having said that, I will be swapping out the APS/MREV2 combo in favor of the Cosworth shortly.
That would be interesting to see.
01-21-2008, 05:21 PM
#53
https://my350z.com/forum/showthread....323060&page=11
I just looked at my dyno, and it looked like with the mrev2/spacer i lost 4hp from 6200-6500 from my peak baseline and it returns to what the original baseline was around 6700, but there is almost 1000rpms worth where i have gained 10+ hp. The tq is greater everywhere and it looks like it never took a hit.
I just looked at my dyno, and it looked like with the mrev2/spacer i lost 4hp from 6200-6500 from my peak baseline and it returns to what the original baseline was around 6700, but there is almost 1000rpms worth where i have gained 10+ hp. The tq is greater everywhere and it looks like it never took a hit.
Last edited by BakaN20; 01-21-2008 at 05:31 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ars88
Zs & Gs For Sale
18
04-04-2016 07:52 AM
