Notices
Intake Exhaust Moving all that air in and out efficiently

What will TP's or HFC's do for me?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-16-2008, 08:27 AM
  #21  
2007 Z
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
2007 Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tampa & Orlando, FL
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by T_K
Back pressure is never good, you're referring to velocity.

TK
No, I meant back pressure.

The effects of back pressure

A muffler is an ambiguity in the performance world, as it can have both good and bad effects on power output. Back pressure is essential for peak power in almost any application, even 6000hp alcohol-burning Top Fuel dragsters have some built-in back pressure. Before we begin this discussion, take note that 1 atmosphere is the pressure that air is at naturally (uncontained) at sea level.

During the combustion process, when the exhaust valve is open, all of the compressed (and depeleted) air-fuel mixture spills out from the cylinders as fast as it can, through your exhaust manifold, into your catalytic converter(s), the muffler, and finally out the tail pipe. The problem with this is, just before your exhaust valve is about to close again, your intake valve opens up, allowing the fresh air-fuel mixture to rush into the cylinders. This is called overlap, and one of the things you take into consideration when choosing a cam, because it can be used to your advantage.

If there was no valve overlap, it would be 100% impossible to completely irradicate all of the spent gases from the cylinder. This has a two-fold effect on power output, depending on what RPM the motor is running at. At low RPM, this effect actually increases torque, because the least amount of compression is lost during the intake stroke, and the ratio of intake to exhaust gases is high. Unfortunately, as the RPMs increase, there is increasingly less time to evacuate the exhaust gases during the exhaust stroke, and more and more depleted air-fuel remains in the cylinders when the exhaust valve closes. The motor becomes incredibly inefficient near its readline. A motor designed for high-torque applications, such as towing, tends to exhibit less valve overlap then normal. The type of cam used in this application is often called an "RV" cam, because a recreational vehicle doesn't need horsepower as much as it needs low-end torque to get it moving.

Your car would also run terribly if there was too much valve overlap as well. When exhaust gases rush out of the cylinder, they create a low pressure area in the cylinder and the exhaust system, sucking the intake charge right into the cylinder, and right back out into the exhaust system. This is called scavenging. When that air spills out, so does the fuel it was carrying, so the O2 sensor reports a rich condition to the computer, often causing further decreases in the amount of fuel the computer injects. At low RPMs, this effect is most pronounced as there is sufficient time to suck out a significant portion of the intake charge, reducing torque. As the RPMs increase, however, the extra velocity imparted to the intake charge increases the amount that squeezes into the cylinder after the exhaust valve closes, as the valve closes so quickly at high RPMs that barely any intake charge escapes through the exhaust system.

No doubt you see the dilemna posed to designers when they choose a cam for the motor - the right combination of power must be achieved at the intended RPM range of the vehicle - if this is a tiny four cylinder, which must spin high RPM to make any power at all, you have to design in a higher amount of overlap. If the vehicle is mostly intended for low speed towing, you design in a smaller amount of overlap for more low-end grunt. Overlap is one of the reasons why the four-cylinder Acura Integra GS-R makes 170hp at almost 7000 RPM, and your 3.0L makes 171lb-ft of torque at 2000 RPM.

You can't control your overlap without changing the cams, but the effects caused by changing the back pressure are the same. When you reduce back pressure, it is equivalent to increasing valve overlap, and when you increase back pressure, it is the same as decreasing the amount of valve overlap. That's why some people will say, "you need a muffler for torque", or, "you'll have more high-end, but less torque, if you run straight exhaust". They are right, but a muffler's purpose is to reduce sound output, not horsepower! By reducing back pressure in an exhaust system, you increase high-end horsepower at the cost of low-end torque.

You can compensate for this by increasing the velocity of the intake charge. Increasing the intake velocity has the added side effect of increasing back pressure, because there is more air to be evacuated during the exhaust stroke. Note that if you increase intake velocity past the limits of the exhaust system, the gains you achieve are diminished to the point of being non-existent. That power will be there when you do upgrade the exhaust system, which is why something as simple as upgrading the exhaust system can result in huge horsepower gains.

You can decrease back pressure by increasing the size of your exhaust manifolds, or using separate tubes for each cylinder (called headers). Increasing the size of the exhaust pipe and decreasing its length also helps, as well as installing high-flow catalytic converters and mufflers. Of course, you could just cut them off. Although it is illegal in the United States to remove the catalytic converter in a registered vehicle, the muffler is a different story...
link to the article.

Old 09-20-2016, 07:50 AM
  #22  
OdesiTT
New Member
 
OdesiTT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 82
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2007 Z
No, I meant back pressure.



link to the article.

Backpressure is never good for 4 stroke engines. People mistaking scavaging with backpressure.

Link for Motordyne article
https://motordyneusa.com/exhaust-bac...nd-scavenging/
Old 09-20-2016, 08:05 AM
  #23  
OdesiTT
New Member
 
OdesiTT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 82
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2007 Z
No, I meant back pressure.



link to the article.

BTW, proper pipe w/smaller diameter may fave less backpressure than oversized because of scavaging
Old 10-06-2016, 07:41 PM
  #24  
absurdparadox
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
absurdparadox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: KS
Posts: 310
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OdesiTT
Backpressure is never good for 4 stroke engines. People mistaking scavaging with backpressure.

Link for Motordyne article
https://motordyneusa.com/exhaust-bac...nd-scavenging/
While absolutely correct, that is one hell of a necro, lol
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
silverbullet_Z
NA Builds
24
11-14-2015 02:52 AM
AutoStore350z
Intake Exhaust
30
03-13-2007 06:23 PM
m1james@bellsou
Intake Exhaust
45
11-20-2006 02:13 PM
dingobiatch
Intake Exhaust
9
07-01-2006 08:05 AM
350Z_LMS
Intake Exhaust
5
04-12-2006 05:44 AM



Quick Reply: What will TP's or HFC's do for me?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:20 AM.