Notices
Intake Exhaust Moving all that air in and out efficiently

HKS true dual power loss?!?!?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-19-2008, 11:09 AM
  #1  
gambino
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
gambino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: South Jordan, Utah
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default HKS true dual power loss?!?!?

So I bought an HKS true dual for my 07 based on hundreds of good reviews. Installed it, LOVE the sound, LOVE the looks (rolled me rear bumper too!). Only problem is my recent dyno......let me set this up for you.

I have had the car dynoed on 4 seperate occasions now (for different reasons) ALL ON THE SAME DYNO. The first three times were done stock and were consistent, the fourth time was three days ago with the exhaust and I was VERY disappointed with the results.
Dyno 1 - May 2007 - temp probably in the 60's - 266rwhp (stock)
Dyno 2 - November 2007 - temp in 40's - 266rwhp (stock)
Dyno 3 - April 2008 - temp high 50-s - 265rwhp (stock w/volks)
Dyno 4 - July 2008 - temp 100 - 233rwhp (volks/HKS)

Needless to say I was STUNNED. All these were done on the same dyno. My main question is could the very high temperature and bad air here in the summer be enough to make a 30+whp difference? Or is the HKS causing a power loss as well? Any input would be appreciated.

Last edited by gambino; 07-19-2008 at 11:58 AM.
Old 07-19-2008, 12:07 PM
  #2  
411Z
Registered User
 
411Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: North Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

the heat didnt help you, but i doubt accounted for 30whp. ive always said this since the day i got here... large diameter dual exhaust is not good on a stock Z! it is just too much flow that the stock motor doesnt need, and in turn hurts power across the board.

that being said, its kinda wierd you lost that many hp. normally you might lose a little, or even go up a bit. but the major problem with big exhaust is loss of tq. what was your tq loss?
Old 07-19-2008, 12:11 PM
  #3  
bbs350z
Registered User
iTrader: (85)
 
bbs350z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Scottsdale AZ
Posts: 6,662
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

wow..thats weird as hell.
Old 07-19-2008, 12:13 PM
  #4  
Jay'Z
Banned
iTrader: (118)
 
Jay'Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Carbon Fiber, TX
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

WOOOOOOOW..
Old 07-19-2008, 12:16 PM
  #5  
gambino
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
gambino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: South Jordan, Utah
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah I know! I am as shocked as you!!!

Torque loss was only 221 to 207. Maybe bad gas from the last fillup? I am just stunned.
Old 07-19-2008, 12:19 PM
  #6  
Jay'Z
Banned
iTrader: (118)
 
Jay'Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Carbon Fiber, TX
Posts: 10,944
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Its not bad gas.. Its the NA factor and throwing a true dual.... For your application it was ftl.. Maybe if you get a tune youll be looking like before or better... The ecu could be doing that to you..
Old 07-19-2008, 12:19 PM
  #7  
haeshik
Registered User
iTrader: (36)
 
haeshik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 7,548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

seriously wtf?!?! i guess i gotta go dyno mine and see whats up
Old 07-19-2008, 12:31 PM
  #8  
411Z
Registered User
 
411Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: North Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Jay'Z
Its not bad gas.. Its the NA factor and throwing a true dual.... For your application it was ftl.. Maybe if you get a tune youll be looking like before or better... The ecu could be doing that to you..
finally someone that knows what theyre talking about.

and OP, allow me to elaborate on jay'z' statement. not bad gas. the tq loss is from the lack form in the exhaust flow, as the exhaust now has more room than its volume. this is no bueno in the exhaust world. since you spent so much money on this exhaust, going back is not an option. i would say that you could get the numbers back up N/A, but your gonna have to add more power for sure.
Old 07-19-2008, 12:36 PM
  #9  
gambino
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
gambino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: South Jordan, Utah
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Oh I plan on adding more power! Thats why I am frustrated to see my first power mod send it the wrong direction!
Old 07-19-2008, 12:38 PM
  #10  
411Z
Registered User
 
411Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: North Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

what size are the pipes? 3"
Old 07-19-2008, 12:40 PM
  #11  
Fluid1
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Fluid1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NOPE NOPE NOPE
Posts: 11,953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gambino
Oh I plan on adding more power! Thats why I am frustrated to see my first power mod send it the wrong direction!

I see COBB in your signature. Do you have the AccessPort, and any maps downloaded to your ECU??
Old 07-19-2008, 12:41 PM
  #12  
robertinmesa
Registered User
 
robertinmesa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: arizona
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

it seems likely there is some other unknown variable affecting the dyno outcome.
Old 07-19-2008, 12:59 PM
  #13  
ssgohan434
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
 
ssgohan434's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: WA
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Isn't this exhuast the HKS Ti TD? That's a 2.25" true dual exhaust iirc... that is certainly not 'oversized' for N/A application.
Old 07-19-2008, 01:21 PM
  #14  
gambino
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
gambino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: South Jordan, Utah
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

its def. not 3". I think it is like 2.25 or 2.3.

And I am the testbed car for cobb, hence all the baseline dynos
Old 07-19-2008, 02:07 PM
  #15  
2004Black350z
Exhaust Whore
iTrader: (37)
 
2004Black350z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NC
Posts: 10,097
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 411Z
the heat didnt help you, but i doubt accounted for 30whp. ive always said this since the day i got here... large diameter dual exhaust is not good on a stock Z! it is just too much flow that the stock motor doesnt need, and in turn hurts power across the board.

that being said, its kinda wierd you lost that many hp. normally you might lose a little, or even go up a bit. but the major problem with big exhaust is loss of tq. what was your tq loss?
Please reframe from sayin DA comments like this. 2.25' exhaust is not to big by no means
Old 07-19-2008, 02:24 PM
  #16  
07_350z_JP
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
07_350z_JP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

HKS superior R&D =

JK- Its the weather. While a dyno does adjust for humidity/heat/elevation etc it has no idea how much timing your car is pulling due to extremly high ambient temp/ intake temps.

I have to look for my dyno plots but I dynoed several times during different dyno days (same place) and during a 95 deg day in the shade vs 78 degree day there was a 11 hp diff and about 5 lb/ft.

Do the math using my example and it adds up. Just go back on a cooler day or just laugh at your buddies results too!
Old 07-19-2008, 02:38 PM
  #17  
Cux350z
hatersgonnahate
iTrader: (162)
 
Cux350z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 14,342
Received 956 Likes on 721 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gambino
So I bought an HKS true dual for my 07 based on hundreds of good reviews. Installed it, LOVE the sound, LOVE the looks (rolled me rear bumper too!). Only problem is my recent dyno......let me set this up for you.

I have had the car dynoed on 4 seperate occasions now (for different reasons) ALL ON THE SAME DYNO. The first three times were done stock and were consistent, the fourth time was three days ago with the exhaust and I was VERY disappointed with the results.
Dyno 1 - May 2007 - temp probably in the 60's - 266rwhp (stock)
Dyno 2 - November 2007 - temp in 40's - 266rwhp (stock)
Dyno 3 - April 2008 - temp high 50-s - 265rwhp (stock w/volks)
Dyno 4 - July 2008 - temp 100 - 233rwhp (volks/HKS)

Needless to say I was STUNNED. All these were done on the same dyno. My main question is could the very high temperature and bad air here in the summer be enough to make a 30+whp difference? Or is the HKS causing a power loss as well? Any input would be appreciated.

a 50 degree difference can lower your HP. notice how the car always feels stronger in the winter........Cooler air is more dense and contains more 02. Your car runs leaner and makes more power and cools easier.

Your ECU probably reacts differently to those temps. At 100 degrees you would think the ecu would retard timing a bit to avoid detonation. Your AIT is pretty warm compared to 50 degrees.
Old 07-19-2008, 03:08 PM
  #18  
411Z
Registered User
 
411Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: North Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 2004Black350z
Please reframe from sayin DA comments like this. 2.25' exhaust is not to big by no means
for some reason, i was thinking the hks was 3". your right, 2.25 should not be too big. but still, being a dual exhaust it might still need more power. think of it this way.... with a dual 2.25 system, you have 4.5" of exhaust flow. if you put a single 4.5" exhaust on a stock Z, do you really think your not gonna lose power? not such a DA comment now is it?
The following users liked this post:
blufc3s (08-28-2015)
Old 07-19-2008, 03:26 PM
  #19  
dkorr
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
dkorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 411Z
for some reason, i was thinking the hks was 3". your right, 2.25 should not be too big. but still, being a dual exhaust it might still need more power. think of it this way.... with a dual 2.25 system, you have 4.5" of exhaust flow. if you put a single 4.5" exhaust on a stock Z, do you really think your not gonna lose power? not such a DA comment now is it?
so we should go true dual exhausts no greater than 1.5" per side?
Old 07-19-2008, 03:31 PM
  #20  
Cux350z
hatersgonnahate
iTrader: (162)
 
Cux350z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 14,342
Received 956 Likes on 721 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 411Z
for some reason, i was thinking the hks was 3". your right, 2.25 should not be too big. but still, being a dual exhaust it might still need more power. think of it this way.... with a dual 2.25 system, you have 4.5" of exhaust flow. if you put a single 4.5" exhaust on a stock Z, do you really think your not gonna lose power? not such a DA comment now is it?





still a very DA comment, especially considering you tried to redeem yourself and express that it was a good comment.

2.25 duals do not equal the flow or capacity of a 4.5 single.

remember the area of a circle from grade school.........pi*R*R

2.25*2.25*pi = 16 sq inches of flow
1.125*1.125*pi*2 = 8 sq inches of flow

not even getting into the fluid mechanics of a 4.5 pipe vs a 2.25.........leaving that to a ME


Quick Reply: HKS true dual power loss?!?!?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:50 AM.