Notices
Intake Exhaust Moving all that air in and out efficiently

Put CATS back in

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 21, 2014 | 07:02 PM
  #1  
ronn1's Avatar
ronn1
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 2
From: Burbank, Ca
Default Put CATS back in

Failed CA Smog on my 08 with HFCs (first time testing)

Now the surprise part>>>
Car has BETTER THOTTLE RESPONSE (below 3K RPM) and SHIFTING IS SMOOTHER (in lift throttle) with cats back in. That's because RPMs drop off more slowly in shifting. It's noticeable and I don't think it's trivial either. If you cruise at 2500 3000 RPM and want to PASS or accelerate quickly, it makes a difference. Not saying HFCs don't add HP..they do. This is just my take on *daily driving* with cats back in. I didn't realize all this until a made the sudden transition back ..it really surprised me!

This isn't the old *low rpm torque* vs *high rpm torque * ..*back pressure*..*Scavaging* stuff, although those lurk as factors I don't wish to re-hash. Just an indisputable observation I have made personally. If I had to make an analogy, it would be somewhat like going from a light flywheel back to stock in that RPMS *HOLD UP* better and are slower to drop with the cats. I was surprised to see the car was more responsive and *drivable* than with HFCs in. Another factor could be that sensors (A/F and 02) are now working as they were supposed to. I noticed IDLE RPM is more steady now and doesn't *HUNT* like it did with the HFC. Yes, I miss the *growl*, but it was getting old and on the HWY it was always *there* (no drone). Car still has nice sound with Gemini Cat back and I actually enjoy the lower decibel experience. I will leave em in from here out.

Just my take. I know there aren't many who have driven with HFCs or TPs for several years and then went back to Cats.

Last edited by ronn1; May 23, 2014 at 11:08 PM.
Reply
Old May 22, 2014 | 01:08 AM
  #2  
terrasmak's Avatar
terrasmak
Super Moderator
MY350Z.COM
Premier Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 29,117
Likes: 2,400
From: Sin City
Default

Tune helps, HR's really need a tune to bring it together
Reply
Old May 22, 2014 | 10:21 AM
  #3  
ronn1's Avatar
ronn1
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 2
From: Burbank, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by terrasmak
Tune helps, HR's really need a tune to bring it together
Yes..I had Osiris before putting in the Gemini...they said additional tune wasn't required for that mod. As far as adding HFC later, yes may have helped some..but I would have still faced the SMOG failure in Ca. I was told HFC wouldn't add more than 10HP tops and that would be at the top end...so SOUND appears the only reason in my mind for this mod. 95% of those who add an HFC (or TP) will never really utilize the modest PERFORMANCE enhancement unless they seriously track the car. With FI cars, it's a different story. As I mentioned, no point in going BACK to the HFC..even if I can pass smog next time. Not worth it for me and I actually enjoy the *new feel* of responsiveness and *quieter* exhaust note. Maybe it's my age showing now
Reply
Old May 22, 2014 | 07:44 PM
  #4  
Suwaidi's Avatar
Suwaidi
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia, PA
Default

I'll have to dig around for my old dyno sheet, but after installing ART's I could definitely the difference (+8whp, +11tq). Power was increased through pretty much the whole powerband, not just up top.
Reply
Old May 22, 2014 | 08:03 PM
  #5  
ronn1's Avatar
ronn1
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 2
From: Burbank, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by Suwaidi
I'll have to dig around for my old dyno sheet, but after installing ART's I could definitely the difference (+8whp, +11tq). Power was increased through pretty much the whole powerband, not just up top.
That would be interesting. All I know at this point is that the stock cats have improved response and shifting in daily driving over the HFC. This is BELOW 3500K rpm and that's a LOT of daily driving. I'm not taking pure dyno #s...it's basic feel and seat of the pants. In a nut shell, it's simply more enjoyable all the way around with the cats back in. If someone were to ask me flat out>>"SHOULD I GET AN HFC INSTALLED IN a daily driver 350Z", I would say, NO...not unless you're going to seriously race it. I've had em in for two years and going back to stock is an IMPROVEMENT for daily driving. As far as sound...yes they will exaggerate the sound..for better or for worse.
That's a personal thing. I liked the sound of the HFC, but it started to get *old*. Stock cats with a nice Catback can enhance the sound moderately and I find my Gemini cat back gives just what I want. It's all a matter of balance and taste.
Reply
Old May 23, 2014 | 09:46 PM
  #6  
ronn1's Avatar
ronn1
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 2
From: Burbank, Ca
Default

Found this article...funny how he found EXACTLY what I did when I put stock cats back in>>

http://www.gmtuners.com/gta/emission.htm

Truth: From personal experience, the catalytic converter has been a blessing in disguise for me. After installing the unit(s) first on my 86 Monte Carlo, I immediately noticed how much more smooth the power band was. It seemed as though I had extra low end power without it affecting the top end grunt of my EFI 355 engine
Truth: Most older pellet-type cat converters were very restrictive, but these were virtually all replaced by the mid-80's with new rare metal containing honeycomb type units especially on V8 equipped GM and most other manufactures' vehicles. These new type converters are very efficient as long as they did not become damaged or plugged by lead and other non-converter safe fuel additives. Recent dyno tests have in fact showed that modern converters rob only about 3-8 horsepower depending on application. In many cases, the factory cat-back exhaust system robbed as much as 40 HP compared to an aftermarket, performance-oriented system.
Another interesting article that compares 1) Stock Cat 2) Gutting cat 3) TP

http://www.importtuner.com/tech/impp...ct_or_fiction/

The Verdict:
Compared to our baseline runs, we were able to see no benefit of the hollowed-out cat versus leaving its catalyst core intact, and compared to the test pipe, there was no question; the gutted cat lost all around. Exhaust gasses became turbulent as they passed into the cat's open reservoir, actually increasing backpressure and hurting power. As we had suspected, replacing our car's cat with the test pipe cost a few low- and mid-range ponies and lbs-ft (bad for daily driving), but more than made up for it up top (good for race day). Bottom line: Keep the cat intact for the street, replace with a proper test pipe for the track.

Last edited by ronn1; May 23, 2014 at 10:23 PM.
Reply
Old May 27, 2014 | 11:04 PM
  #7  
superstuddc27's Avatar
superstuddc27
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
Default

It's harder to drive because HFC and TP give better throttle response. the RPMS will fall quicker and the Z is already a hard car to drive due to the clutch being so on and off.
You probably shouldn't get a lighter flywheel if you didn't like the HFC
Reply
Old May 30, 2014 | 09:57 PM
  #8  
ronn1's Avatar
ronn1
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 2
From: Burbank, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by superstuddc27
It's harder to drive because HFC and TP give better throttle response. the RPMS will fall quicker and the Z is already a hard car to drive due to the clutch being so on and off.
You probably shouldn't get a lighter flywheel if you didn't like the HFC
Indeed. I will stay with the stock flywheel if/when I do the clutch. Just change to HD CSC and I'm good to go. Yes...I know, I'm one of the few (if any) who say the HEAVY DMF is a *good* thing and *noise* from the tranny is isn't .
Reply
Old May 30, 2014 | 10:25 PM
  #9  
Deception's Avatar
Deception
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Default

If you're interested in selling your HFCs, let me know.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2014 | 12:42 PM
  #10  
ronn1's Avatar
ronn1
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 2
From: Burbank, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by Deception
If you're interested in selling your HFCs, let me know.
Sold them already.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2014 | 01:33 PM
  #11  
Junkster's Avatar
Junkster
New Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,587
Likes: 18
From: Sacramento
Default

im waiting for my first smog to come up this year as well. I had Stillen HFC's and decided to sell for TP's once i found out that i will still fail smog even with them in...other than smell wth is the point? lol...smh

Need to find some OEM cats and get prepared for smog ughh damn Cali
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AbrasiveRaysive
Intake Exhaust
5
Sep 20, 2021 02:29 PM
Li1ag
Exhaust
1
Sep 28, 2015 02:07 PM
samansharif
Brakes & Suspension
1
Sep 25, 2015 12:31 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:41 PM.