merlin holly intake 350z
#21
I will see how my set up goes, whenever I get my heads back.
But I do hope you are open to international orders in the future, Torqen over here in the UK could supply UK/Europe I imagine (I passed a link to them).
But I do hope you are open to international orders in the future, Torqen over here in the UK could supply UK/Europe I imagine (I passed a link to them).
Last edited by RobPhoboS; 04-23-2020 at 03:43 AM.
The following users liked this post:
MERLINMACHINING (04-23-2020)
#23
New Member
iTrader: (1)
These forward facing intake plenums always make the Z look horrible. Have you guys ever put thought into going to more of an oval or elongated pipe with the same surface area? The GT300 Z's got away with a forward facing plenum because they have a drysump system and their engines are moved down and towards the firewall allowing room. Their manifolds are also slightly leaning forward to allow for a lower lip near the front of the plenum. Lots of things could be done to make these more eye pleasing and produce power IMO and once that is achieved these would become on par if not an easier decision to make than ITBs.
#24
New Member
iTrader: (2)
These forward facing intake plenums always make the Z look horrible. Have you guys ever put thought into going to more of an oval or elongated pipe with the same surface area? The GT300 Z's got away with a forward facing plenum because they have a drysump system and their engines are moved down and towards the firewall allowing room. Their manifolds are also slightly leaning forward to allow for a lower lip near the front of the plenum. Lots of things could be done to make these more eye pleasing and produce power IMO and once that is achieved these would become on par if not an easier decision to make than ITBs.
The following users liked this post:
bealljk (04-23-2020)
#25
New Member
iTrader: (1)
$1200 for a group buy still seems pretty high for me if you're talking cost. That means regular cost will be approaching $1500-$2k not including a tune? A plenum spacer would be my go to for a lower priced solution but if I am spending this kind of money I'm close to the cost of just going all out with ITBs or CJMs manifold. If this can fit under the hood and provide power though that's when it becomes a game changer.
I'm just offering a different perspective versus the "mo powa who cares about aesthetics" crowd. I'm not cutting a hole in my hood... No matter the power gains. I believe most people will say the same.
I'm just offering a different perspective versus the "mo powa who cares about aesthetics" crowd. I'm not cutting a hole in my hood... No matter the power gains. I believe most people will say the same.
The following users liked this post:
DarkZ03 (04-23-2020)
#26
ZMoneyPIT: Have you calculated how much it costs for ITB's ?
It's pretty scary unless you get very lucky with any used parts !
It's pretty scary unless you get very lucky with any used parts !
#27
New Member
iTrader: (1)
Edit: I also want to add that I want anything done on this platform to succeed. I have nothing but hope that the R&D and effort put into projects such as these pay off. I am delighted everytime we have something new coming our way especially when it comes to plenum design changes. I just want it to look good and function as well.
Last edited by ZMoneyPIT; 04-23-2020 at 09:30 AM.
The following users liked this post:
RobPhoboS (04-24-2020)
#28
New Member
iTrader: (11)
I am aware of the costs involved with any big project with this platform.
Edit: I also want to add that I want anything done on this platform to succeed. I have nothing but hope that the R&D and effort put into projects such as these pay off. I am delighted everytime we have something new coming our way especially when it comes to plenum design changes. I just want it to look good and function as well.
Edit: I also want to add that I want anything done on this platform to succeed. I have nothing but hope that the R&D and effort put into projects such as these pay off. I am delighted everytime we have something new coming our way especially when it comes to plenum design changes. I just want it to look good and function as well.
#29
New Member
iTrader: (11)
I'd also like to see someone make a kit that mirrors the velocity manifold with a better surge tank and a TB that would sit somewhere under the strut bar facing forward. Or do a dual TB setup, this was done back in the day before the HR existed and hasn't been done since.
#31
I own this manifold as well and actually made 303whp 240ft lbs with just the hi ram fbo e85.
the torque was low due to my exhaust setup being too big and also u lose torque with the Hi ram but trust me on the top end u don’t feel it but the low end u do feel the lack of torque but I love it
the torque was low due to my exhaust setup being too big and also u lose torque with the Hi ram but trust me on the top end u don’t feel it but the low end u do feel the lack of torque but I love it
#32
i made 303whp 240ftlbs with that manifold with fbo e85 on my 03 350z without cams or anything
but once i put the 3.69 diff i lost 10whp but im gonna resume with building the motor and try to make 400whp with a c10/C9 cam
but once i put the 3.69 diff i lost 10whp but im gonna resume with building the motor and try to make 400whp with a c10/C9 cam
#40
u gotta understand holleyhi ram takes torque away for horsepower but when ur in the car up top u feel it instead of down low and also with the manifold u need to rev to at least 7800 to meet peak power.