Updated Pics
#69
Registered User
iTrader: (25)
haha he actually had this setup before i did. But now that he has stretch tires we do have very similar setup minus the front lip.
Welcome to the stretch club Love the new look/stance. Def. one of the cleanest Z's on the site.
The F---? lol, having your wheel wells evenly filled with tires wont look right, it's like a perfect circle on top of a perfect circle
Looks great. The hood is freaking bad ***, not to much camber , dam near perfect.
I would have gone with a slightly taller tire. They are a little short and don't fill out the wheel wells. People always drop the car the try make it fit/look right but the short tire does not fit the well from front to back IMO.
BTW your car is not a Kouki, it would need to be an 07/08, it would actually fall into zenki or if you really wanted to get technical chuuki since it is in between changes.
I would have gone with a slightly taller tire. They are a little short and don't fill out the wheel wells. People always drop the car the try make it fit/look right but the short tire does not fit the well from front to back IMO.
BTW your car is not a Kouki, it would need to be an 07/08, it would actually fall into zenki or if you really wanted to get technical chuuki since it is in between changes.
#71
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
haha he actually had this setup before i did. But now that he has stretch tires we do have very similar setup minus the front lip.
Welcome to the stretch club Love the new look/stance. Def. one of the cleanest Z's on the site.
The F---? lol, having your wheel wells evenly filled with tires wont look right, it's like a perfect circle on top of a perfect circle
Welcome to the stretch club Love the new look/stance. Def. one of the cleanest Z's on the site.
The F---? lol, having your wheel wells evenly filled with tires wont look right, it's like a perfect circle on top of a perfect circle
#75
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
looks good the chargespeed sides are key.
lol ya ill just drive down to cali for a weekend haha. would actually love to do that one day though ive wanted to visit California for so long
lol ya ill just drive down to cali for a weekend haha. would actually love to do that one day though ive wanted to visit California for so long
#80
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thanks for the comments
to sry110- my rear fenders are just rolled. im not sure thinkin maybe a couple more degrees camber depends how low u are right...like ideally id like to run a 265 instead and go a bit lower but my suspension is maxed out. if i had to take a guess id say -4.5 ish. A local guy has 275 on the +12 by 10.5 i dont think hes running spacers anyways hes slammed and running about -6 camber in the rear.
i assumed you were talking about the rear right? cause 265 wont fly in the front at the offset/width. hope that kind of gives u an idea. definetly with my setup if i went 265 rear i would need a tiny bit more camber possibly. again depends how low u go. lower=more camber
to sry110- my rear fenders are just rolled. im not sure thinkin maybe a couple more degrees camber depends how low u are right...like ideally id like to run a 265 instead and go a bit lower but my suspension is maxed out. if i had to take a guess id say -4.5 ish. A local guy has 275 on the +12 by 10.5 i dont think hes running spacers anyways hes slammed and running about -6 camber in the rear.
i assumed you were talking about the rear right? cause 265 wont fly in the front at the offset/width. hope that kind of gives u an idea. definetly with my setup if i went 265 rear i would need a tiny bit more camber possibly. again depends how low u go. lower=more camber