Who'd Win?
#1
Who'd Win?
I'm going to lay out some different scenarios on different cars versus each other... Voice your opinion on who you think would win.
Assume:
-> The drivers are all of equal ability.
-> None of them are "expert" drivers. (ie. Those driving the manuals are your average Joe Schmoe who likes his sports cars, and even though he's more than familiar with the correct shifting techniques - not all would label him any type of "expert")
Scenario #1
Automatic 2003 350Z vs. Manual 2003 Mustang GT Coupe
Advantages: None - Head to Head.
Scenario #2
Manual 2003 350Z vs. Manual 2003 Mustang GT Coupe
Advantages: None - Head to Head.
Scenario #3
Manual 2003 350Z vs. Manual 2003 Mustang Mach 1
Advantages: None - Head to Head.
Scenario #4
Automatic 2003 350Z vs. Manual 2003 Mustang GT Coupe
Advantages: 350Z has 1 Car Length Start Advantage
Scenario #5
Manual 2003 350Z vs. Manual 2003 Honda S2000
Advantages: None
.. So, what do you think?
~B
Assume:
-> The drivers are all of equal ability.
-> None of them are "expert" drivers. (ie. Those driving the manuals are your average Joe Schmoe who likes his sports cars, and even though he's more than familiar with the correct shifting techniques - not all would label him any type of "expert")
Scenario #1
Automatic 2003 350Z vs. Manual 2003 Mustang GT Coupe
Advantages: None - Head to Head.
Scenario #2
Manual 2003 350Z vs. Manual 2003 Mustang GT Coupe
Advantages: None - Head to Head.
Scenario #3
Manual 2003 350Z vs. Manual 2003 Mustang Mach 1
Advantages: None - Head to Head.
Scenario #4
Automatic 2003 350Z vs. Manual 2003 Mustang GT Coupe
Advantages: 350Z has 1 Car Length Start Advantage
Scenario #5
Manual 2003 350Z vs. Manual 2003 Honda S2000
Advantages: None
.. So, what do you think?
~B
#3
LOL!
Few things aren't a waste of bandwidth, my friend. Posted in the wrong forum, maybe - and my apologies for doing so. But a waste of bandwidth?
LOL.... Thanks for the laugh.
I'll concur once the administration of this site who pays the bills (and I doubt that's you) decides that this thread is a waste of bandwidth and either closes this thread, or asks me for cash reimbursement of their bandwidth. Which I'd be more than willing to provide.
~B
Few things aren't a waste of bandwidth, my friend. Posted in the wrong forum, maybe - and my apologies for doing so. But a waste of bandwidth?
LOL.... Thanks for the laugh.
I'll concur once the administration of this site who pays the bills (and I doubt that's you) decides that this thread is a waste of bandwidth and either closes this thread, or asks me for cash reimbursement of their bandwidth. Which I'd be more than willing to provide.
~B
Trending Topics
#8
Have a Q for you CrazyBosnian and any other big displacement cars that might be reading this thread. Just looking at your mods I was wondering if lowering your TA hurt your 60 foot times at the strip? Most of my experience drag racing is with bikes, but I would think on such a front heavy car like a TA having to stiff of a suspension would hurt your weight transfer launching (getting traction). Is this somewhat true or not really? Just curious.
#9
Originally posted by Rob Nance
Have a Q for you CrazyBosnian and any other big displacement cars that might be reading this thread. Just looking at your mods I was wondering if lowering your TA hurt your 60 foot times at the strip? Most of my experience drag racing is with bikes, but I would think on such a front heavy car like a TA having to stiff of a suspension would hurt your weight transfer launching (getting traction). Is this somewhat true or not really? Just curious.
Have a Q for you CrazyBosnian and any other big displacement cars that might be reading this thread. Just looking at your mods I was wondering if lowering your TA hurt your 60 foot times at the strip? Most of my experience drag racing is with bikes, but I would think on such a front heavy car like a TA having to stiff of a suspension would hurt your weight transfer launching (getting traction). Is this somewhat true or not really? Just curious.
I think scenario #1 with equal drivers would go to the Mustang, and #3 of course would go to the Mach 1. The rest would go to driver. In that the most talented would win meaning the cars are close enough that a slight miss would cause a loss.
#10
Originally posted by Rob Nance
Have a Q for you CrazyBosnian and any other big displacement cars that might be reading this thread.
Have a Q for you CrazyBosnian and any other big displacement cars that might be reading this thread.
Just looking at your mods I was wondering if lowering your TA hurt your 60 foot times at the strip? Most of my experience drag racing is with bikes, but I would think on such a front heavy car like a TA having to stiff of a suspension would hurt your weight transfer launching (getting traction). Is this somewhat true or not really? Just curious.
#11
Well, I guess I deserved that It is semi true though. 5.7 litre is getting up there. I mean even mustangs are using 4.6 litre engines now. Not a whole lot of cars (not trucks) have a larger displacement from the factory short of some exotics.
Interesting info on the springs and such, thanks. I wasn't aware the weight distro was pretty even on the TA's, more news to me.
Interesting info on the springs and such, thanks. I wasn't aware the weight distro was pretty even on the TA's, more news to me.
#14
Originally posted by Rob Nance
Well, I guess I deserved that It is semi true though. 5.7 litre is getting up there. I mean even mustangs are using 4.6 litre engines now. Not a whole lot of cars (not trucks) have a larger displacement from the factory short of some exotics.
Interesting info on the springs and such, thanks. I wasn't aware the weight distro was pretty even on the TA's, more news to me.
Well, I guess I deserved that It is semi true though. 5.7 litre is getting up there. I mean even mustangs are using 4.6 litre engines now. Not a whole lot of cars (not trucks) have a larger displacement from the factory short of some exotics.
Interesting info on the springs and such, thanks. I wasn't aware the weight distro was pretty even on the TA's, more news to me.
For the sake of exactness, the TA's weight distribution may be a little worse than the Z28's (the 56:44 I quoted) as the TA's front bodywork is a bit heavier.
#15
Originally posted by TRMach1
Don't know about the 350Z against the Honda. I can tell you exactly how #3 turns out, Mach 1 will take the Z everytime. The rest are pretty much in the hands of the driver and luck.
Don't know about the 350Z against the Honda. I can tell you exactly how #3 turns out, Mach 1 will take the Z everytime. The rest are pretty much in the hands of the driver and luck.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tochigi_236
Feedback & Suggestions for Our Forum
8
09-27-2015 04:40 PM
1JZMKIII
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z
5
11-23-2002 10:26 PM