Notices
NA Builds Specifically for naturally aspirated builds & projects with Cams, Pistons Rods, Heads, Valves, etc

NA Project Part II with Forged Performace NA built motor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 11:53 AM
  #121  
rednezz's Avatar
rednezz
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Sharif@Forged
Maybe I missed it, but how much timing are you running near redline?

Also, post up a dyno chart...we are somewhat blind without one.

I'd like a crack at tuning this thing, if you can bring it down to us. Would make for a fun roadtrip!!!
That would be awesome road trip...need to tow a trailer as well to bring enough slicks so we can make a trip to a track near you.

Still awaiting the dyno data from UpRev. I got a print out...I can try to get a pic of it and post it later today. If I remember right timing was in the 70 degree range after 5000 rpm.

Originally Posted by Z1 Performance
compression has very little overall affect when on pump gas, and it only has a big affect on race gas when you start running big compression figures

I am only at 11.3:1 - jumping to 13 might have netted me another 10 hp...maybe

The cam specs are fine...again, mine are way milder from both a duration and lift and my car is making nearly 30 whp more, on a dyno dynamics. In fact the Tomei's have a really steep ramp rate, and as such, make broad power. The headers are definitely limiting things (not the right one for those cams), but even still the #'s should be higher I think.

Again, I don't think the VTC is your issue whatsoever, and in fact, I didn't even adjust it on my car (I have no way to do it as I didn't use the NISMO VTC pullies nor can UTEC adjust for them)

Your timing is insanely weak to be honest with you. You are running WAY less advance than you should be (I am running considerably more than you and mine is really, really conservative still)

Other companies give you the cam specs with the cams...it's on the cam card they provide (I got one with my Tomei, and I'd assume the set he is using got them too), so setup should be quite easy. I didn't even need to buy new lifters with mine (retained my stock valves though I went to NISMO springs)

Definitely a good start, and nothing to sneeze at, but I wouldn't start ditching parts just yet till you get it narrowed down

Start with the fuel/ignition maps first...worry about VTC angles last

You also should be revving it higher too (speak to Sharif about where he feels it can go to comfortably). I hit 300 whp at around 6700 ish rpm. At 7350 for example, I'm a bit over 300 whp and rev'd to 8200 as I recall on the dyno (and now have upped it a bit more)

What was torque curve/peak like?

As for the MAF it will absolutely help if you've got the heads to support it (which you do, even if they are unmodded). The throttle body, I honestly don't think will change things all that much, yet.

Also - this jsut dawned on me too. What spec 272 are you running (they offer a dew different ones). Got the part #?
I am running the 272 with 11.3 mm lift intake and 11 mm lift exhaust. Dont remember the lsa off hand.

I am going to try to find some long tubes to see what they will do and remove the exhaust after the headers to see if that will help improve anything.

Last edited by rednezz; Oct 16, 2007 at 11:56 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 01:55 PM
  #122  
NA&CH's Avatar
NA&CH
General & Tech Senior Moderator
MY350Z.COM
Premier Member
iTrader: (74)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,175
Likes: 132
From: Florida
Default

Hey I know these are from ebay and I mentioned this in another thread but look at these.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/03-07...QQcmdZViewItem

Also Adam@Z1 said they will be doing a set with kooks for Kwames car. Talk with them.

Chris
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 02:02 PM
  #123  
Z1 Performance's Avatar
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 5
From: Long Island, New York
Default

Originally Posted by miamimax96
According to Z350lover's findings, going from stock compression to 11.5:1 netted 19 WHP. That's pretty significant in the n/a arena especially considering these gains from raised CR can be found everywhere in the powerband.
he did more than just change compression


Originally Posted by miamimax96
Do you know this for a fact? Duration and lift specifications are only 1 part of the equation when it comes to cams. Too much exhaust cam duration can do more harm than good depending on where that duration is placed, exhaust port flow, and the intake cam specification.
Yes, I know it for a fact - I'm not a newbie


Originally Posted by miamimax96
I guess I should've said they make the valve timing specs available to you BEFORE purchase so you can make a truly informed decision. What good is knowing specs AFTER the fact? You're stuck with 'em either way.
I've got the Tomei #'s available to anyone who asks
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 02:18 PM
  #124  
nismology1's Avatar
nismology1
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 332
Likes: 1
From: South Fla.
Default

Originally Posted by Z1 Performance
he did more than just change compression
Well of course he did........

He had nismo cams installed with nismo valve springs. They floated, and he replaced the valvetrain with Ferrea gear and added 11:5 compression pistons and Carrillo rods. So unless you're suggesting that the valvetrain or rods added power ( ) , the 19 WHP gain was by virtue of the increased compression alone.


https://my350z.com/forum/showpost.ph...&postcount=130
Yes, I know it for a fact - I'm not a newbie
A different perspective can still be useful. Sometimes...


I've got the Tomei #'s available to anyone who asks
Missing the point.....lol
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 02:24 PM
  #125  
Z1 Performance's Avatar
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 5
From: Long Island, New York
Default

I'm not interested in going tit for tat with you, but yes, I am absolutely stating, not suggesting, that changing valves, by virtue of the machining work one generally does to the seats to accept the new valves, can change the power of the motor. Especially if the valves are larger diameter than stock. If you want to see what a compression change can do to a motor, you can run some very simple formulas in automath to get a very general idea. Going from 10.3 to 11.5 won't be more than a virtual pimple's difference.

I'm not missing the point...I got the #'s from Tomei by asking, not out of thin air
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 02:34 PM
  #126  
nismology1's Avatar
nismology1
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 332
Likes: 1
From: South Fla.
Default

Originally Posted by Z1 Performance
I'm not interested in going tit for tat with you, but yes, I am absolutely stating, not suggesting, that changing valves, by virtue of the machining work one generally does to the seats to accept the new valves, can change the power of the motor. Especially if the valves are larger diameter than stock. If you want to see what a compression change can do to a motor, you can run some very simple formulas in automath to get a very general idea. Going from 10.3 to 11.5 won't be more than a virtual pimple's difference.
The valves were stock size. We will simply have to agree to disagree.

I'm not missing the point...I got the #'s from Tomei by asking, not out of thin air
Maybe because you're a vendor for them? I dunno, I tried getting specs from Tomei and couldn't get a hold of any. My point is, they should be READILY available to all on their respective websites, like JWT does it.


But while we're on the subject, do you have specs for the 11.3/11.0mm 272's? I'd like to take a look.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 02:55 PM
  #127  
rednezz's Avatar
rednezz
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

Well here is a pic of the dyno chart...its poor quality since its a pic of the print out.
Attached Thumbnails NA Project Part II with Forged Performace NA built motor-dscf0002.jpg  
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 02:58 PM
  #128  
Z1 Performance's Avatar
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 5
From: Long Island, New York
Default

ok so on a stock valve size...yes it still makes power

How? 1. a proper valve job (factory one is ok as far as production engines go, but leaves ALOT on the table.

2. Valvesprings - it's no mystery when building a motor than the more spring pressure you have, the more power you can mate via elimination of any potential float. The reason Ritchie had a problem, IMHO, is his first setup was using a spring insufficient for his cam. If these two things are not matched to work with one another, you'lll end up with exactly what he did...an expensive bill

As for the Tomei #'s, he's using a cam that will work great on a built NA motor, but the cam wants to rev...it's not going to want to be in the 5k-6k range, it wants to be in the 6k and up range. With respect to the #'s, I got them simply by asking Tomei Japan. There is no one else worth asking, as Tomei does not have a US office. My machinist now has all those figures, and I can call him tomorrow. Or perhaps rednezz can scan and post the cam card
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 03:10 PM
  #129  
nismology1's Avatar
nismology1
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 332
Likes: 1
From: South Fla.
Default

Originally Posted by Z1 Performance
As for the Tomei #'s, he's using a cam that will work great on a built NA motor, but the cam wants to rev...it's not going to want to be in the 5k-6k range, it wants to be in the 6k and up range.
The HP peak @ the stock redline is what's concerning me. I suppose I'm just not sold on cams by virtue of their lift and duration specs alone. Cams are a complex science and drawing conclusions at a glance can leave some HP on the table.

With that said, according to the engine dyno on tomei's site, these 272/272 have more potential than is being shown here. I'm pretty sure with extra tweaking there's more power to be gained up top.

With respect to the #'s, I got them simply by asking Tomei Japan. There is no one else worth asking, as Tomei does not have a US office. My machinist now has all those figures, and I can call him tomorrow. Or perhaps rednezz can scan and post the cam card
Either one would be sweet. I would just like to confirm or disprove my suspicions concerning the exhaust valve timing.

Last edited by nismology1; Oct 16, 2007 at 05:00 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 09:08 PM
  #130  
TheJerk's Avatar
TheJerk
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Default

I feel like I have been let down. Post those heads, get a revup manifold, and a good header. There should be no reason for the VQ to make these type of numbers.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007 | 09:10 PM
  #131  
TheJerk's Avatar
TheJerk
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Default

BTW, you'll have to move further right to make more power. Expect to lose some low end power. Trade off should be worth it though
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 11:16 PM
  #132  
rednezz's Avatar
rednezz
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

Well I found out a couple of reasons why my car probably didn't make more power. I removed the intake manifold and I found one of the stand off's for the MD spacer missing. I looked into the heads and there it was all toasting looking. I was lucky it was to big to fall into the chamber and ruin yet another motor. Also found a vacuum leak and a bad gasket on one of the VTC solenoids. However, I still have a hesitation problem when I go full throttle even after the tune. Not sure what is causing it. I need redyno and maybe retune now that I found and fixed two problems.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 06:02 AM
  #133  
Sharif@Forged's Avatar
Sharif@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Performance
iTrader: (92)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 13,733
Likes: 1
From: Marietta, GA
Default

Since you mentioned VTC solenoids, another thing to check, is to log your cam angles with the Cipher, and make sure that BOTH banks are phasing correctly. I had a car in here once, that made crap for power, and we found that one bank wasnt phasing at all.

Last edited by Sharif@Forged; Oct 18, 2007 at 06:14 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 10:16 AM
  #134  
rcdash's Avatar
rcdash
New Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,474
Likes: 65
From: Chapel Hill, NC
Default

Originally Posted by rednezz
Well I found out a couple of reasons why my car probably didn't make more power. I removed the intake manifold and I found one of the stand off's for the MD spacer missing. I looked into the heads and there it was all toasting looking. I was lucky it was to big to fall into the chamber and ruin yet another motor. Also found a vacuum leak and a bad gasket on one of the VTC solenoids. However, I still have a hesitation problem when I go full throttle even after the tune. Not sure what is causing it. I need redyno and maybe retune now that I found and fixed two problems.
Yikes! Time to JB weld that MD post stand off! Probably fell off as you were putting the upper plenum back on.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2007 | 06:37 AM
  #135  
rednezz's Avatar
rednezz
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

Here is the export of my dyno data...first run vs. last run after tune.
Attached Thumbnails NA Project Part II with Forged Performace NA built motor-dyno.jpg  
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2007 | 10:38 AM
  #136  
DanielW's Avatar
DanielW
Banned
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
From: Concord, North Carolina
Default

Man I was deffinitely expecting you to break 300 on this one, especially on a DJ. I agree with Sharif, for what you did those number should be coming from a DD if anywhere
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2007 | 11:15 AM
  #137  
rednezz's Avatar
rednezz
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by DanielW
Man I was deffinitely expecting you to break 300 on this one, especially on a DJ. I agree with Sharif, for what you did those number should be coming from a DD if anywhere
I haven't given up...I still think I can get close or break it. Now that removed the stand off and the vacuum hose fixed the car actually feels much stronger...seems to have more torque. I need to tweak the tune again since I no longer have that blockage in one of the cylinders. I am sure that standoff was drastically reducing the power out of that cylinder. I wouldn't be surprised if I dyno tune again I can pick up another 10 rwhp.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2008 | 07:24 PM
  #138  
turismo's Avatar
turismo
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,448
Likes: 0
From: curl lookin boy
Default

Bump for results
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2008 | 08:27 PM
  #139  
arsine's Avatar
arsine
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: bogus raton, fl
Default

yah, right. this thread and z1 one have been the best na reading. its made me rethink what i want to do to my ride and how to go about it.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2008 | 09:00 PM
  #140  
rednezz's Avatar
rednezz
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

Well I have finally sorted out all the bugs. The car is definitely stronger than my last dyno of 294. Strong enough to pull away from my friends EVO that runs 110+ mph in the quarter and edge out a C6 vette. The car has tremendous initital jump when I first go 100% throttle at any speed. The weirdest part is once the car hits 80+ mph the car really starts to pull really hard...doesn't matter if its 3rd, 4th, 5th or 6th gear. Seems like there is a ram air effect going on at the speed and higher. The engine just comes to life.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:27 PM.