I don't have the graph handy but if you search threads I have started then you will see it. It was on a DD but a sim correc. Factor was used, they stated it was equiv within 1-2 hp of what the dj down the road reads...they've proven that. My car pulls good, I have proven it against de and hour motors that I have run against with similar mods.

 

no one is calling you a liar... maybe the 4.08FD needs to be considered in the equation, i didn't see that!

i guess we can all agree...
notice that 75-77 lb/ft per liter at flywheel is a very high number for N/A

you have a very torque'y motor, congratulations
Zquicksilver

 

I know....but just stating the facts...

 

on my 03 i made 270rwhp and 260ft/lbs. tq that was before my cobb tune and headers. want to do another run soon btw i ran on a dynojet

 

i call B.S.!!!!

 

my 05 is running 300whp and 271 trq on a mild bolt on build with a tune

 

You guys need to reread this post and his previous one. You can't compare dyno to dyno, or car to car. You can only compare the same car with its own baseline. To make a more accurate comparison of torque, you can't compare raw numbers to each other. Take the percentage increase of your current torque compared with your baseline torque, then use that number to compare with others.

Even in this case, dyno should be the same dyno and conditions should be similar, although the result is already inaccurate so correction factors for ambient conditions will play a small role. In any case, it's better than measuring raw numbers, which means nothing.

TK