Notices
NA Builds Specifically for naturally aspirated builds & projects with Cams, Pistons Rods, Heads, Valves, etc

4.0liter with new heads?

Old Aug 9, 2008 | 06:06 PM
  #1  
TwinTurboz33's Avatar
TwinTurboz33
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
Default 4.0liter with new heads?

Going over some ideas with my shop foreman at work today. An idea that we are putting together is swapping the well know vq40de from the xterra, pathfinder,frontier, all that good stuff. Take the 07-08 heads, and put em on there. Some sweet configuration although I am sure someone has already done this!
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2008 | 11:30 PM
  #2  
OCG35's Avatar
OCG35
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
From: OC - So Cal
Default

Title is a question.

Post is a statement.

What’s the purpose of the words?

Are you asking if someone has done it?

Are you asking if you should do it?

Or are you just stating it the way the title and post read? Which would explain why I’m the only one responding.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2008 | 05:40 AM
  #3  
TwinTurboz33's Avatar
TwinTurboz33
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
Default

Wow...now I know when I am never on this board, and on driver instead.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2008 | 05:50 AM
  #4  
Cux350z's Avatar
Cux350z
hatersgonnahate
Premier Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (162)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 15,390
Likes: 1,085
From: Greenville, SC
Default

sounds like a project best performed at Performance Factory. Hes done som sick work over the last few years.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2008 | 08:46 AM
  #5  
Z1 Performance's Avatar
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 5
From: Long Island, New York
Default

lots of math involved to see if this would even work...you'll need the assistance of a good shop for it. Post some info if you do it
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2008 | 10:05 PM
  #6  
leozim's Avatar
leozim
New Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
From: southcali
Default

Originally Posted by TwinTurboz33
Wow...now I know when I am never on this board, and on driver instead.
hey man don't get drawn to useless comments on this board. most of the people here are actually helpful. you just got to get out there and meet them. not the ones who dwells and hide behind their computer.....
anyways back to the topic. i think that would be interesting and it would be great to see it work. alot researching to be done but still i think it would be worth it. post up some info as you guys go along with the build
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2008 | 10:12 PM
  #7  
leozim's Avatar
leozim
New Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
From: southcali
Default

and post some pics, just incase you guys decide to go with the build

Last edited by leozim; Aug 10, 2008 at 10:17 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2008 | 09:17 AM
  #8  
KA24DE's Avatar
KA24DE
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 363
Likes: 3
From: FLA
Default

I heard the Vq40's have better heads than regular VQ35's. Infact, Supposedly altima SE-R's had the VQ40's head on the VQ35, which helped with the HP jump over the standard 3.5SE.

Anyhow, why do you want a truck motor, and a low redline, and less power?
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2008 | 09:30 AM
  #9  
NiZMo1o1's Avatar
NiZMo1o1
New Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
Default

Originally Posted by KA24DE
I heard the Vq40's have better heads than regular VQ35's. Infact, Supposedly altima SE-R's had the VQ40's head on the VQ35, which helped with the HP jump over the standard 3.5SE.

you have a links that states those comments ?
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2008 | 02:22 PM
  #10  
nismology1's Avatar
nismology1
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 332
Likes: 1
From: South Fla.
Default

Originally Posted by KA24DE
I heard the Vq40's have better heads than regular VQ35's. Infact, Supposedly altima SE-R's had the VQ40's head on the VQ35, which helped with the HP jump over the standard 3.5SE.
The heads aren't any "better" than the standard VQ35's. They just used softer valve springs. Ditto A34 maxima and newer pre-07 murano/quest.

Anyhow, why do you want a truck motor, and a low redline, and less power?
Factory redline is just that, a factory limitation. There are ways around these things. Besides, who's to say that the bottom end couldn't support higher revs and that the factory redline was just a reflection of the application?

Also, the VQ40 block has a better rod/stroke ratio than non-HR 3.5's as far as top-end power is concerned. The IM setup and cams are really what hold it back. It also has the stronger HR-style bottom end.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2008 | 12:11 PM
  #11  
KA24DE's Avatar
KA24DE
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 363
Likes: 3
From: FLA
Default

Originally Posted by NiZMo1o1
you have a links that states those comments ?
I'd have to search Altimas.net again, but again, those are claims, and nothing that I've personally seen.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2008 | 12:14 PM
  #12  
KA24DE's Avatar
KA24DE
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 363
Likes: 3
From: FLA
Default

Originally Posted by nismology1
The heads aren't any "better" than the standard VQ35's. They just used softer valve springs. Ditto A34 maxima and newer pre-07 murano/quest.


Factory redline is just that, a factory limitation. There are ways around these things. Besides, who's to say that the bottom end couldn't support higher revs and that the factory redline was just a reflection of the application?

Also, the VQ40 block has a better rod/stroke ratio than non-HR 3.5's as far as top-end power is concerned. The IM setup and cams are really what hold it back. It also has the stronger HR-style bottom end.
The bottom end may be better, but I don't think you can say a longer stoke is better for higher RPM use.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2008 | 02:08 PM
  #13  
xlr8r's Avatar
xlr8r
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: SLC
Default

The Rod to Stroke ratio is apparently better than that of a DE because the Vq40's use the same taller deck that the HR's do. That generally equates to better performance at higher RPM's but you are moving more mass around a larger radius (more moment of inertia) so there is a point where it can become too much. I don't know what that point is though.

I'm really curious what kind of RPM's the 92mm stroke crank can handle. A local shop has a VQ40DE crank modded for fitment in VQ35DE, that I'm debating using. The unfortunate thing is I won't have the taller decks so Rod:stroke ratio gets worse, but there are those stroker VQ35DE motors out there built to rev to 7500-8000 rpm depending on the actual stroke, so if the VQ40DE crank can handle 7500 RPM I may consider it.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2008 | 02:58 PM
  #14  
UpRev's Avatar
UpRev
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,095
Likes: 0
From: Austin TX
Default

The lower OEM specified RPM on the VQ40 is because the power drops off dramatically at those RPMs. That has to do with the cam design. Truck = stump pulling torque at ultra low RPM. Car = high HP at high RPM.

The bottom ends on the VQ40 should be fine for factory Z/G RPMs, and the VQ35 motors handle higher RPM just fine once you use different cams/springs that can net you any power up there. So if you're looking for stock Z/G rpm out of the VQ40, use aftermarket cams and go to town.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2008 | 04:19 PM
  #15  
KA24DE's Avatar
KA24DE
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 363
Likes: 3
From: FLA
Default

Originally Posted by UpRev
The lower OEM specified RPM on the VQ40 is because the power drops off dramatically at those RPMs. That has to do with the cam design. Truck = stump pulling torque at ultra low RPM. Car = high HP at high RPM.

The bottom ends on the VQ40 should be fine for factory Z/G RPMs, and the VQ35 motors handle higher RPM just fine once you use different cams/springs that can net you any power up there. So if you're looking for stock Z/G rpm out of the VQ40, use aftermarket cams and go to town.
And manifold. Again, as he said, unless he's using the Taller block, he might have issues with the rod speeds at higher RPM. I didn't even remember that VQ40 had a the HR's taller block...
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2008 | 09:39 PM
  #16  
nismology1's Avatar
nismology1
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 332
Likes: 1
From: South Fla.
Default

Originally Posted by KA24DE
The bottom end may be better, but I don't think you can say a longer stoke is better for higher RPM use.
It's a good thing I never said that.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2008 | 05:58 AM
  #17  
ShinerMiller's Avatar
ShinerMiller
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: CS_TX
Default

Shiner reporting for duty here. Nothing but a lurker seeking out power mods for the fronty, but I say go for it. Ive got a decent set of bolt-ons and an Uprev tune (#2 to get tuned ever! woo). She's putting down 245hp/260tq to the wheels on 87 octane tune (with the auto trany ) and running a 14.8 in the 1/4m in my 4500lbs 4x4 crew cab beast!! I'd like to see if this goes anywhere.
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2008 | 06:21 AM
  #18  
Hraesvelg's Avatar
Hraesvelg
Got Uranium?
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 35,723
Likes: 6
From: The Recliner of Rage
Default

Originally Posted by TwinTurboz33
Wow...now I know when I am never on this board, and on driver instead.
Because no one is over there?
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2008 | 09:13 AM
  #19  
gothchick's Avatar
gothchick
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,300
Likes: 1
From: ATL
Default

Originally Posted by Hraesvelg
Because no one is over there?
+1
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2008 | 05:13 PM
  #20  
KhanMan's Avatar
KhanMan
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,686
Likes: 0
From: Hollywood California
Default

Sounds like an interesting mod, but don't you think the VQ37HR headers to be a better fit and work easier as that is designed more for a sports car than a truck?
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:06 AM.