Just traded my s2000 for a blue z
#6
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: charlotte, nc
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
heres a pic of my s, its a good car, but after getting the z there is no comparison. I like the ride, interior, pretty much everything better except that it was a convertible and revs to 9k. The Z is faster and i had exhaust and aem on the s. Its a fun car but the z takes it i think overall. The inside is bigger and roomier for me, im 6'4. and no more annoying highway sounds. Just got to get used to shifting a different points.
whats going on yoyo, gald i know atleast one person on here
whats going on yoyo, gald i know atleast one person on here
Last edited by boneyard; 10-30-2005 at 05:06 PM.
#7
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: indiana
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You did the right thing leaving the s2000, for me the interior was way too boring. I just made up my mind getting a 350z myself. Ordered it a while ago, should be here in 2-3 weeks. 2006 lemans sunset with burnt orange seats, touring with nav. I will be doing a few nismo upgrades as soon as it arrives. Starting with the suspention and camshafts.
Last edited by Seth-Q8; 10-30-2005 at 05:21 PM.
Trending Topics
#10
New Member
iTrader: (3)
Congratulations with the Daytona Blue Z, no doubt you'll love it. I can't say you're moving forward or moving back with the Z. I'm sure you already know they're both very good cars in their own way. Having owned an Integra GSR and an RSX Type-S, I can understand how hard it is to part with that stratospheric redline! Who cares, the only stock Honda that can beat you off the line now's an NSX. Welcome to the Z family...and good color choice!
#12
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: charlotte, nc
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Z feels better, s has more of a "go kart" feel to it. The S was sexy as the z but after driving one for 6 months then switching to the z there was major differences. The interior is the biggest, the S was lagging, not many features and the interior was really small. Another is the dronning sound the S made was very annoying. The Z was more practical has more space then the S2000. And the S has no torque or power below 4k. The Z has power all over. I think the S handles a lil bit better but not by much. I really like both cars but the Z is a better car. I dont know who has had both but I would take the Z over an S. And the daytona blue is damn sexy.
#14
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: San Jose
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by boneyard
The Z feels better, s has more of a "go kart" feel to it. The S was sexy as the z but after driving one for 6 months then switching to the z there was major differences. The interior is the biggest, the S was lagging, not many features and the interior was really small. Another is the dronning sound the S made was very annoying. The Z was more practical has more space then the S2000. And the S has no torque or power below 4k. The Z has power all over. I think the S handles a lil bit better but not by much. I really like both cars but the Z is a better car. I dont know who has had both but I would take the Z over an S. And the daytona blue is damn sexy.
thanks for the info, i have been trying to find the pros and cons of both...and visiting s2ki.com was a bad place to look lol, all i found was negative comments about the Z
#16
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: BayArea
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
welcome boneyard~ my roommate has yellow s2k and he goes to s2ki.com forum all the time. I think his user name is beanolo. I was looking into getting s2k or g35 but as soon as i test drove the new Z, i changed my mind.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dark Knight
Wheels Tires
7
11-11-2015 08:40 PM
tm9293
North East Marketplace
13
10-17-2015 09:14 PM