1st mod
Trending Topics
Abzolutely Zexy
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,504
Likes: 3
From: Lithia/Tampa, Flo-Rida Bishes
I found this under top 100 questions. Anybody agree with what it says?
2006+ Stock intake:
pro: same as above, except with an improved velocity stack / venturi ring. This accelerates air coming into the plenum, which is a more efficient design. Arguably the best intake available for the 350Z in my humble opinion.
con: same as above, but still one of the best out there
JWT popcharger:
pro: can suck higher volume of air compared to stock due to high performance filter. Improved velocity stack (venturi ring) compared even to 06+ stock intake. The venturi ring accelerates air coming into your plenum for added power.
con: sucks hot air from engine bay and heat shield does not really help all that much in preventing it from sucking hot air. People have reported a problem stalling when travelling at high speeds and putting the car in neutral with this intake.
STILLEN Intake:
pro: similar design to the JWT popcharger. Includes a venturi ring, and a very functional cold-air-box to make this one of the best intake available. Does not suffer from the same hot air sucking as the JWT popcharger.
con: the price is significantly higher than the JWT intake, but this is the only Con I can think of.
Long tube CAI such as Nismo, Injen:
pro: sucks colder air, (note...so does stock)
con: More pressure losses due to a longer tube. This is a fact of life folks. More bends and longer tube = more pressure losses. In fact, long tube CAI's have even shown horsepower LOSSES on a dyno.
K&N typhoon (short tube like stock intake / JWT popcharger, but includes a front-mounted scoop):
pro: cone-type filter should suck a higher volume of air compared to stock. attempts to offset JWT popcharger's hot-air syndrome by incorporating a cold air scoop.
con: hard to prove that the scoop is actually effective
HKS Racing Suction
pro: Shorter tube like stock, higher flowing filter
con: People have stated that the install is difficult, price is rather high for what seems like a minimal improvement over JWT popcharger
2006+ Stock intake:
pro: same as above, except with an improved velocity stack / venturi ring. This accelerates air coming into the plenum, which is a more efficient design. Arguably the best intake available for the 350Z in my humble opinion.
con: same as above, but still one of the best out there
JWT popcharger:
pro: can suck higher volume of air compared to stock due to high performance filter. Improved velocity stack (venturi ring) compared even to 06+ stock intake. The venturi ring accelerates air coming into your plenum for added power.
con: sucks hot air from engine bay and heat shield does not really help all that much in preventing it from sucking hot air. People have reported a problem stalling when travelling at high speeds and putting the car in neutral with this intake.
STILLEN Intake:
pro: similar design to the JWT popcharger. Includes a venturi ring, and a very functional cold-air-box to make this one of the best intake available. Does not suffer from the same hot air sucking as the JWT popcharger.
con: the price is significantly higher than the JWT intake, but this is the only Con I can think of.
Long tube CAI such as Nismo, Injen:
pro: sucks colder air, (note...so does stock)
con: More pressure losses due to a longer tube. This is a fact of life folks. More bends and longer tube = more pressure losses. In fact, long tube CAI's have even shown horsepower LOSSES on a dyno.
K&N typhoon (short tube like stock intake / JWT popcharger, but includes a front-mounted scoop):
pro: cone-type filter should suck a higher volume of air compared to stock. attempts to offset JWT popcharger's hot-air syndrome by incorporating a cold air scoop.
con: hard to prove that the scoop is actually effective
HKS Racing Suction
pro: Shorter tube like stock, higher flowing filter
con: People have stated that the install is difficult, price is rather high for what seems like a minimal improvement over JWT popcharger
Not for an HR engine it isn't....
And the hp added from the Injen intake is very noticable along with the sound. Two independent testers on the dyno show +10whp in the top end and you can definetly feel that on the butt dyno.
If you want to go with a short ram, at least on the HR, it won't gain anything but sound and if you go with Fujita then you actually lose HP. I reccomend the Injen Dual Intake or the K&N drop in filters.
And the hp added from the Injen intake is very noticable along with the sound. Two independent testers on the dyno show +10whp in the top end and you can definetly feel that on the butt dyno.
If you want to go with a short ram, at least on the HR, it won't gain anything but sound and if you go with Fujita then you actually lose HP. I reccomend the Injen Dual Intake or the K&N drop in filters.
Not for an HR engine it isn't....
And the hp added from the Injen intake is very noticable along with the sound. Two independent testers on the dyno show +10whp in the top end and you can definetly feel that on the butt dyno.
If you want to go with a short ram, at least on the HR, it won't gain anything but sound and if you go with Fujita then you actually lose HP. I reccomend the Injen Dual Intake or the K&N drop in filters.
And the hp added from the Injen intake is very noticable along with the sound. Two independent testers on the dyno show +10whp in the top end and you can definetly feel that on the butt dyno.
If you want to go with a short ram, at least on the HR, it won't gain anything but sound and if you go with Fujita then you actually lose HP. I reccomend the Injen Dual Intake or the K&N drop in filters.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tochigi_236
Feedback & Suggestions for Our Forum
8
Sep 27, 2015 03:40 PM



....







