Best Motoring Nismo 370z vs Spec C vs Evo vs NSX-R vs Tom's IS-F
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: new Yark
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Best Motoring Nismo 370z vs Spec C vs Evo vs NSX-R vs Tom's IS-F
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GCRwKv4qQ5k
Nismo 370z 355ps
Spec C
Evo (Ralliart springs, intake, and exhaust) 300 PS
Tom's IS-F (suspension) 420ps
NSX-R 280ps
Was disappointed in the Z considering how much lighter it is compared to the STi and the Evo.
Nismo 370z 355ps
Spec C
Evo (Ralliart springs, intake, and exhaust) 300 PS
Tom's IS-F (suspension) 420ps
NSX-R 280ps
Was disappointed in the Z considering how much lighter it is compared to the STi and the Evo.
#3
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: new Yark
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#4
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#14
_______________
iTrader: (2)
most of you take BM's races way too seriously..
i remember when they ran a 135i vs e92 and they "coincidentally" both ran 13.3 in the quarter mile.. what they were trying to convey is that the germans made their flagship m series as slow as their entry-level sports coupe. BUT we all know the e92 runs faster than 13.3 and the 135i slightly slower than 13.3. This is an example of their biased reviews..
nonetheless they make some interesting videos to watch..
i remember when they ran a 135i vs e92 and they "coincidentally" both ran 13.3 in the quarter mile.. what they were trying to convey is that the germans made their flagship m series as slow as their entry-level sports coupe. BUT we all know the e92 runs faster than 13.3 and the 135i slightly slower than 13.3. This is an example of their biased reviews..
nonetheless they make some interesting videos to watch..
#15
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: new Yark
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts