Notices
North West Washington, Montana, Oregon, Idaho, Wyoming

370z or evo x ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 23, 2009 | 08:48 AM
  #21  
mw9's Avatar
mw9
Registered User
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,405
Likes: 5
From: cincinnati
Default

I think Nissan has dropped the ball on there motor for the Z, yeah it has more HP, but its lacking torque. The EVO's gain HP and torque every year and every model. I love the look of the Z, not a real big fan of the EVO's looks. I think if Nissan would turbo the Z, like the BMW's V6, you will have a monster of a car. Looks and torque. I do prefer the 9 over the X.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2009 | 06:59 PM
  #22  
djSLiM's Avatar
djSLiM
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
From: Puyallup, WA
Default

Originally Posted by AlvinHuyN
I wouldn't consider a 300+ hp sports coupe with RWD "practical" by a long shot...even if it can sit 4 people
why not? i have one...

Originally Posted by mw9
I think Nissan has dropped the ball on there motor for the Z, yeah it has more HP, but its lacking torque. The EVO's gain HP and torque every year and every model. I love the look of the Z, not a real big fan of the EVO's looks. I think if Nissan would turbo the Z, like the BMW's V6, you will have a monster of a car. Looks and torque. I do prefer the 9 over the X.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2009 | 07:35 PM
  #23  
wasuber's Avatar
wasuber
Registered User
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,647
Likes: 0
From: Woodinville, Wa
Default

Originally Posted by AlvinHuyN
I wouldn't consider a 300+ hp sports coupe with RWD "practical" by a long shot...even if it can sit 2 people + 2 midgets
fixed
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2009 | 08:24 PM
  #24  
djSLiM's Avatar
djSLiM
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
From: Puyallup, WA
Default

Originally Posted by AlvinHuyN
I wouldn't consider a 300+ hp sports coupe with RWD "practical" by a long shot...even if it can sit 2 people + 2 110lb. asian girls
moar fixed
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2009 | 08:32 PM
  #25  
350LowLife's Avatar
350LowLife
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0
From: In my Mind
Default

the asian girls can sit on my lap ....I don't need rear seats.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2009 | 08:26 PM
  #26  
Fernandos350z's Avatar
Fernandos350z
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: Springfield,Oregon
Default

Get a Evo X They have a 0% for 60mo.
I think i might trade my Z in for a Evo this weekend if i get approve
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2009 | 11:22 PM
  #27  
djSLiM's Avatar
djSLiM
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
From: Puyallup, WA
Default

Originally Posted by Fernandos350z
Get a Evo X They have a 0% for 60mo.
I think i might trade my Z in for a Evo this weekend if i get approve
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2009 | 06:10 AM
  #28  
skidmarq's Avatar
skidmarq
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,118
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
Default

As an owner of both an Evo X and a 350Z, I would say that the Evo is the clear choice...

The reasons are plentiful, but you are talking about an all wheel drive car that is boosted from the factory. A 370Z is a beautiful car, but will be very expensive to mod should you ever get the itch to do so.

I got my Evo X and it put down 250ish on a Dynojet bone stock. Simply by tuning the factory tune, we were able to get around 300ish. Then by simply adding bolt on mods (intake, exhaust, intercooler, boost controller) we got it to 350ish before the clutch started to argue with us.

That is over 100WHP for under $3500. That is just not possible on the Z platform.

Also, AWD is much more forgiving on the track then RWD. Again, it all depends on your goals for your next car, but these are things to think about before making your decision. When I learned how "cheap" it was to suck HP out of the X, I almost regretted not picking up an Evo a long time ago instead of the long and expensive lessons I learned from owning and boosting a 350Z.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2009 | 09:06 AM
  #29  
Entaille's Avatar
Entaille
New Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 9,043
Likes: 21
From: WA
Default

^seriously. I spent a little bit less and got a quarter of the gains, lol.

I would love an evo x. I think the rear end looks weird
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2009 | 10:21 AM
  #30  
djSLiM's Avatar
djSLiM
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
From: Puyallup, WA
Default

Originally Posted by skidmarq
When I learned how "cheap" it was to suck HP out of the X, I almost regretted not picking up an Evo a long time ago instead of the long and expensive lessons I learned from owning and boosting a 350Z.
a very true statement. i thought about an evo before i bought my g, but didn't buy one for a couple reasons. one was simply because i just can't own a four door car , and the other being that evos and stis are everywhere in the northwest. everybody has one, and a majority of them owned by military guys (i like to call them "signing bonus cars" ). i guess i like doing things the hard way, knowing that when i'm done how hard i worked to accomplish what i did, even if it is not as fast as g.i. joes 500hp sti.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2009 | 11:35 AM
  #31  
skidmarq's Avatar
skidmarq
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,118
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
Default

One other thing that might clinch the deal is that Mitsubishi offers a zero percent financing option on approved credit over 60 months. I love the fact that my monthly payments are all towards the principle on the car and no interest!!!!

http://www.mitsubishicars.com/MMNA/j...0021&loc=en-us
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2009 | 01:20 PM
  #32  
Fernandos350z's Avatar
Fernandos350z
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: Springfield,Oregon
Default

Originally Posted by skidmarq
One other thing that might clinch the deal is that Mitsubishi offers a zero percent financing option on approved credit over 60 months. I love the fact that my monthly payments are all towards the principle on the car and no interest!!!!

http://www.mitsubishicars.com/MMNA/j...0021&loc=en-us
That why i am going to see if i can get approve on my poor *** credit! i might even offer them one of my dogs in the trade.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2009 | 01:21 PM
  #33  
Fernandos350z's Avatar
Fernandos350z
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: Springfield,Oregon
Default

Originally Posted by djSLiM
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2009 | 01:43 PM
  #34  
warmmilk's Avatar
warmmilk
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 1
From: Seattle (area), WA
Default

Originally Posted by skidmarq
Also, AWD is much more forgiving on the track then RWD.
but RWD is SOOOOOOOOO much more fun!!!!! i wanted an evo till i drove my sister's sti on the track, its kinda boring... its just gas, brake, turn, gas. with rwd you actually gotta drive the car and make sure your *** doesn't run away from you, and throttle steering is quite fun also...

Originally Posted by djSLiM
the other being that evos and stis are everywhere in the northwest. everybody has one, and a majority of them owned by military guys (i like to call them "signing bonus cars" ).
idk man, i see alot more z's around than i see evo's. sti's are pretty common though, i'll give you that... 370's are still pretty rare though, i've only seen a few (2 i think) actually on the road...

Last edited by warmmilk; Aug 26, 2009 at 01:45 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2009 | 02:00 PM
  #35  
bboypuertoroc's Avatar
bboypuertoroc
New Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 22,917
Likes: 2,451
From: Get out my way pimpin, VA
Default

Originally Posted by warmmilk
but RWD is SOOOOOOOOO much more fun!!!!! i wanted an evo till i drove my sister's sti on the track, its kinda boring... its just gas, brake, turn, gas. with rwd you actually gotta drive the car and make sure your *** doesn't run away from you, and throttle steering is quite fun also...
STIs suck on track compared to Evos. An Evo is a completely different feeling car... and with a X, it drives VERY RWD-like with the assists turned off.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2009 | 02:03 PM
  #36  
warmmilk's Avatar
warmmilk
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 1
From: Seattle (area), WA
Default

Originally Posted by bboypuertoroc
STIs suck on track compared to Evos. An Evo is a completely different feeling car... and with a X, it drives VERY RWD-like with the assists turned off.
well yeah, i know an evo is better on the track than an sti (thats why i wanted an evo, not an sti), but its still not a rwd car. for me fun factor on the track: rwd>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>awd

but on the street, i'd prefer awd. if i never went to the track, then i'd rather have an evo...
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2009 | 02:06 PM
  #37  
bboypuertoroc's Avatar
bboypuertoroc
New Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 22,917
Likes: 2,451
From: Get out my way pimpin, VA
Default

^ Understood.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2009 | 11:06 PM
  #38  
djSLiM's Avatar
djSLiM
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
From: Puyallup, WA
Default

Originally Posted by warmmilk
idk man, i see alot more z's around than i see evo's. sti's are pretty common though, i'll give you that...
you don't live down south near fort lewis and mccord like i do...
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2009 | 07:48 AM
  #39  
Bumpinjeep's Avatar
Bumpinjeep
New Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,743
Likes: 25
From: Bellevue Wa
Default

Jeep Grand Cherokee STR8

/thread
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2009 | 01:51 PM
  #40  
n1nj4 m0d3's Avatar
n1nj4 m0d3
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
From: Bellevue
Default

^+1. i would have gotten that instead of the evo, but i can't afford a $50k (used) suv right now...

Last edited by n1nj4 m0d3; Aug 27, 2009 at 01:52 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:33 PM.