digital cameras
07-22-2005 | 02:14 PM
#81
Originally Posted by Vlad
RawShooter is free also. I mentioned it couple of times. Along with tweaking WB and things, it also very convenient for picture previews and filtering them (when you need to pick 3 out of 300). It has priorities, so you can assign 1,2,3 and then see only 1, 2 or 3 instead of all. Never used heard of Adobe RAW processing stuff so can't tell. But I know RawShooter is like betwen #1 and #2 on photo forums.
I don't know why PS can't do it better. I just accept it. I'm having troubles remembering stuff I know to warry about inner works. As you can see, photo workflow can be pretty extensive and complex...
And I bet you didn't hear about color profiles yet... like sRGB versus AdobeRGB... BTW,as attractive as "Adobe..." might sound, make sure to set it to sRGB both in your camera and in PS. Google it for more.
I don't know why PS can't do it better. I just accept it. I'm having troubles remembering stuff I know to warry about inner works. As you can see, photo workflow can be pretty extensive and complex...
And I bet you didn't hear about color profiles yet... like sRGB versus AdobeRGB... BTW,as attractive as "Adobe..." might sound, make sure to set it to sRGB both in your camera and in PS. Google it for more.
Sorry, I missed the mention of RAW Shooter being free... well, I'm going to get myself a copy of that tonight
Thanks Vlad.
07-22-2005 | 02:28 PM
#82
Originally Posted by yobri
I've heard about sRGB and AdobeRGB, but I can't provide an in-depth description of both, so I guess I need to read more about them
sRGB was developed by microsoft and is more suited for display on websites, hence most cameras color space settings are set to sRBG by default.
Even though AdobeRBG is a larger color space, it is actuall suited towards those who will end up with a CMYK file ( offset printing and such), so if you shoot AdobeRBG the images may seem dull or less saturated without tweaking. So going by this if you don't plan to end up with CMYK files sRGB is a good color space.... also I believe most Canon's shoot rRGB out of the box.
without adjustment sRBG files tend to appear more contrasty with better color saturation.
Last edited by imntcrzy; 07-22-2005 at 02:33 PM.
07-22-2005 | 06:03 PM
#83
07-22-2005 | 09:18 PM
#84
Originally Posted by Vlad
Canon S60. It's been a thread about digitals every month here. Do search.
07-23-2005 | 02:15 AM
#85
Originally Posted by imntcrzy
07-25-2005 | 06:43 AM
#86
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,706
Likes: 1
From: Great Lakes
Originally Posted by imntcrzy
not really, off the bat the images will be better if I shoot 5800 but to me it makes no difference since my workflow always assumes I'll be editing in PS. I've never used raw shooter, it does sound like a good quick program to use, but my PS sessions involve some masking and other more indepth steps. Hey if raw shooter allows you to do those things it sound great. I should look into it.
07-25-2005 | 06:47 AM
#87
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,706
Likes: 1
From: Great Lakes
Originally Posted by imntcrzy
hmmm I'm not to sure of that, most good cameras do have large buffers yes... I've seen 1ds mark II's shoot a burst of 20 frames JPeg high with no problem and shoot about 5 or 6 raw files and start to lag. This all has to do with cf card speed, buffer sizee and processor speed... like you said, but in my experience cameras seem to lag sooner with the larger raw files. I guess the best way to find this out in the XT is to shoot a burst with raw and shoot a burst with jpg high and see what happens. I would just shoot slower anyways.
Last edited by Vlad; 07-25-2005 at 06:51 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Workshop12
Exterior & Interior
256
03-23-2020 02:45 PM
Tochigi_236
Feedback & Suggestions for Our Forum
8
09-27-2015 04:40 PM
