Notices
Photography Techniques, Cameras, Lenses, & Equipment

Canon 60mm f/2.8 Macro review

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-14-2007, 01:49 PM
  #1  
ctwentytwo
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
ctwentytwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Waipahu HI; Phoenix AZ
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Canon 60mm f/2.8 Macro review

A common inquisitive question after getting an SLR is "do I need other lenses?" After viewing magnified images of miniscule objects or insects, the question becomes a statement- "I need a macro lens."

One option for a macro on a Canon 1.6 sensor (10/20/30/40D; 300/350/400D) body is the EF-S 60mm f/2.8.

For a detailed performance test, read Photozone's Review (Click Here) or you can read various user's opinions on The Fred Miranda Forums (Click Here).

As Photozone's review suggest, this lens is razor sharp. But in my quest to find "the" macro, I found out that ALL MACRO LENSES ARE RAZOR SHARP. I settled on the Canon 60mm because of owner's remarks of "more natural background blur (bokeh)." Here's the definition and examples of Bokeh, difined by Wikipedia. This lens has circular aperture blades, and that may well be what sets it's pleasing, creamy smooth bokeh apart from the competition.

For insects, the 60mm may be a little too short, making you get closer than you want, which may scare your subject. Also, working in wider apertures at 1:1 magnification produces razor thin Depth Of Field, making macro work tricky for critical focus (the live view of the 40D helps tremendously in these situations).




Last edited by ctwentytwo; 03-30-2008 at 04:01 AM.
Old 10-15-2007, 06:00 PM
  #2  
Alberto
Cranky FI Owner
iTrader: (14)
 
Alberto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: DMV
Posts: 34,716
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Amazing pics, nice review
Old 10-15-2007, 08:55 PM
  #3  
kevburgler
Registered User
 
kevburgler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

unbelievable, thanks for the help. I've been trying to decide on a macro lens for myself, but haven't made up my mind yet. This definitely makes it's way into the selection.
Old 10-15-2007, 10:31 PM
  #4  
ctwentytwo
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
ctwentytwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Waipahu HI; Phoenix AZ
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by kevburgler
unbelievable, thanks for the help. I've been trying to decide on a macro lens for myself, but haven't made up my mind yet. This definitely makes it's way into the selection.
You've been taking alot of incredible pics. You should share them. You and me have progressed mightily... I remember your early pics. BTW, thanks for adding me to your Flickr contacts.
Old 10-16-2007, 02:28 PM
  #5  
kevburgler
Registered User
 
kevburgler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ctwentytwo
You've been taking alot of incredible pics. You should share them. You and me have progressed mightily... I remember your early pics. BTW, thanks for adding me to your Flickr contacts.
thank you very much, but I firmly believe that you have WELL surpassed me by far. your work is near flawless when I look at it, and every picture is mesmerizing in a different way.
No problemo for the add on flickr, I have you set to alert when new pictures are added
Old 10-18-2007, 05:56 PM
  #6  
gr?
Registered User
 
gr?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Since it's an EFS lens, it won't work on the 10D.

Canon rebates are out if you haven't seen it yet:
http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/mes...&FileID=216492
Old 03-30-2008, 04:07 AM
  #7  
ctwentytwo
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
ctwentytwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Waipahu HI; Phoenix AZ
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Continuing to process my pics after I got the Pantone Huey monitor calibration device. My understanding of post processing has definitely improved.

Those euphorbias (the small flowers the bees are on) are tiny, averaging 1/4in radius. All these shots are handheld. You can slice and dice with the sharpness of this lens.


















Last edited by ctwentytwo; 03-30-2008 at 04:10 AM.
Old 03-30-2008, 05:43 AM
  #8  
Motormouth
Banned
iTrader: (44)
 
Motormouth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: not here
Posts: 20,190
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

those bees are getting it ON! it's like an orgy.
Old 05-17-2008, 11:33 PM
  #9  
ctwentytwo
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
ctwentytwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Waipahu HI; Phoenix AZ
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Maybe my best macro shot yet... no crop, no exposure comp in software! This one came out great on it's own... but almost every shot can use some adjustment. In this case, just the usual color boost. Love the bees.


Last edited by ctwentytwo; 05-17-2008 at 11:35 PM.
Old 05-18-2008, 10:28 AM
  #10  
knguyen
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
knguyen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 2,616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nice pictures man, damn how do you take the picture so close up that the bee doesn't fly away from you or even sting you? lol
Old 05-18-2008, 12:19 PM
  #11  
GiftOfGab
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
GiftOfGab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: City Of Trees
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

great pics!
Old 05-18-2008, 08:40 PM
  #12  
350GT__Boy
Newbie
 
350GT__Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ctwentytwo, it's your posts that makes me wanna keep shellin more $$ on lenses.....LOL

First, the Sigma 10-20mm which I love to use. Now, I'm on the edge of picking up a Sigma 70mm f/2.8 macro for my Nikon D80 which I'm not sure how frequently I'll use this lens.

Terrific photos by the way! Keep up the good work Bro!
Old 05-18-2008, 10:32 PM
  #13  
ctwentytwo
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
ctwentytwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Waipahu HI; Phoenix AZ
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

More bees! The above pic and these 3 are among 100+ shots, these were the best (in focus). Shooting bees are hard as they rarely stay still, and the razor thin DOF with 1:1 magnification and wide aperture complicates things even more.







Originally Posted by knguyen
Nice pictures man, damn how do you take the picture so close up that the bee doesn't fly away from you or even sting you? lol
You gotta find one that doesn't mind the front lens element being like 2-5 inches away These species of bees aren't all that aggressive.

Originally Posted by GiftOfGab
great pics!
Thanks... get up off your @ss and start practicing or using the camera!

Originally Posted by 350GT__Boy
ctwentytwo, it's your posts that makes me wanna keep shellin more $$ on lenses.....LOL

First, the Sigma 10-20mm which I love to use. Now, I'm on the edge of picking up a Sigma 70mm f/2.8 macro for my Nikon D80 which I'm not sure how frequently I'll use this lens.

Terrific photos by the way! Keep up the good work Bro!
Again, I'm glad I can inspire and motivate others... as others have in-turn inspired and motivated me.

Glad you like the 10-20 Sigma, I'll miss mine I've only heard good things about the 70mm macro. Know this, macros are known to be razor sharp, at all aperture ranges. Image quality is excellent with all macros it seems. The lens can also be used for portrait photography, although not for women as they WILL get offended as the macro will show every detail. Still life and product photography also, which you may want to dabble in.

This shot was also taken with this 60mm macro:

As you can see, they are pretty flexible. Again, image quality from macros are at the top of the food chain.

Last edited by ctwentytwo; 05-18-2008 at 10:35 PM.
Old 05-19-2008, 10:53 PM
  #14  
BlindFiring
Registered User
 
BlindFiring's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: san diego, ca
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

nice photos with the 60.

i prefer using the 105mm macro because you dont have to be so close to the subject and risk having your shadow or yourself mess with the lighting.
Old 02-10-2010, 04:32 PM
  #15  
ahero4eternity
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
ahero4eternity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: LA/SD
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Finally jumping on the macro train with a Canon 100mm 2.8 tomorrow.
Old 02-11-2010, 06:38 AM
  #16  
simonfencer
Registered User
 
simonfencer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bothell, WA
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Those are some great shots. And you are right, it's practice, practice, practice. I wish I was as steady hand held as you are.

I don't have a dedicated macro lens, instead I've been messing around with reversing and coupling rings. Fixed focusing distance but still lots of fun.
Old 02-14-2010, 07:57 AM
  #17  
ni$mo350
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
ni$mo350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Finally moved to the Couv!!!!
Posts: 5,563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm going the cheaper route and picking up the Kenko TC tube set for my 50mm f/1.8. The bokeh might not be as "creamy" but it'll do it's job
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lt_Ballzacki
Brakes & Suspension
39
08-06-2021 06:19 AM
hulkout
370Z Brakes & Suspension
7
04-28-2017 09:00 PM
nanotech
Exhaust
6
10-02-2015 05:02 AM
abarclay
Wheels Tires
4
09-21-2015 04:51 AM
carid
Misc.
0
09-10-2015 06:16 AM



Quick Reply: Canon 60mm f/2.8 Macro review



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:04 AM.