Notices
Photography Techniques, Cameras, Lenses, & Equipment

What lenses are you lusting after?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-17-2008, 01:13 PM
  #1  
ctwentytwo
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
ctwentytwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Waipahu HI; Phoenix AZ
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default What lenses are you lusting after?

1. Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8. Finally, a constant 2.8 aperture on an ultra-wide lens. Crop sensor only though.

Late June release for only $570!
http://www.adorama.com/TN1116EOS.html

Ken Rockwell's glowing take on the Nikon Mount:
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tokina/11-16mm.htm

2. Sigma 150-500mm f/5-6.3 OS. I'm getting addicted to extreme telephoto. This successor to the 50-500 "Bigma" has OS, Sigma's image stabilizer to boot, at $900. Available "soon." Also available soon is the 100-400mm OS for $800. Small max aperture is a handicap though in handheld situation, but the OS will certainly help for still subjects.

3. Sigma 10mm f/2.8 fisheye. Always wanted a fisheye for the distortion. What sets this apart from the older Canon and Sigma 15mm f/2.8 fullframe lenses are the newer generation lens's CA, flare, and halation control.

4. Sigma 30mm f/1.4 or 50mm f/1.4. Need a better large aperture lens, and the 50mm f/1.8 is no longer cutting it. Would get the Canon 50mm f/1.4 or 85mm f/1.8, but wide-open, there are halation issues where these newer gen lens's do not.

Man, photography wasn't supposed to be taken to this extreme... it was supposed to be about the car...
Old 04-17-2008, 05:35 PM
  #2  
SS728
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
SS728's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 2,918
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have the Tokina 10-17mm f/3.5-4.5 and I love it.

With all my camera stuff and lenses, I could have many, many Z parts :P
Old 04-17-2008, 09:34 PM
  #3  
Bubble
-REPLICA ARMY-
iTrader: (50)
 
Bubble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Yorba Linda, CA
Posts: 10,067
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Sigma 150-500mm would get my vote.
Old 04-18-2008, 02:28 AM
  #4  
ctwentytwo
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
ctwentytwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Waipahu HI; Phoenix AZ
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Bubble
Sigma 150-500mm would get my vote.
Damn Bubble, I thought you only bought L lenses
Old 04-18-2008, 04:23 AM
  #5  
stu46
Registered User
 
stu46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 4,801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Why such a big deal over a f/2.8 on a UWA?

Sigma 150-500 looks good.
Old 04-18-2008, 06:39 AM
  #6  
Bubble
-REPLICA ARMY-
iTrader: (50)
 
Bubble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Yorba Linda, CA
Posts: 10,067
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by ctwentytwo
Damn Bubble, I thought you only bought L lenses
i did. 500IS. however, alternative is also good and Sigma 150-500 looks pretty good.
Old 04-18-2008, 08:32 AM
  #7  
simonfencer
Registered User
 
simonfencer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bothell, WA
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm after a Bigma, although the 150-500 would be nice too.

and a Pentax 100mm smc P-D FA F2.8 Macro would be a lot of fun to have too.

Both would be for my K10D.
Old 04-18-2008, 08:56 AM
  #8  
iStan
ZR
iTrader: (29)
 
iStan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 6,444
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

See Bubble's list of gear
I think 70-200mm F/2.8L IS is up next for me...

Well, It was suppose to be about the car...but now I'm ready to say fawk it, part out car and go big in Photography..
Old 04-18-2008, 06:13 PM
  #9  
Old Master Q
New Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Old Master Q's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: mygtr principality of Sealand
Posts: 2,426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

+1 on the 70-200 2.8L IS
Old 04-18-2008, 10:02 PM
  #10  
ahero4eternity
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
ahero4eternity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: LA/SD
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ctwentytwo
1. Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8. Finally, a constant 2.8 aperture on an ultra-wide lens. Crop sensor only though.

Late June release for only $570!
http://www.adorama.com/TN1116EOS.html

Ken Rockwell's glowing take on the Nikon Mount:
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tokina/11-16mm.htm

2. Sigma 150-500mm f/5-6.3 OS. I'm getting addicted to extreme telephoto. This successor to the 50-500 "Bigma" has OS, Sigma's image stabilizer to boot, at $900. Available "soon." Also available soon is the 100-400mm OS for $800. Small max aperture is a handicap though in handheld situation, but the OS will certainly help for still subjects.

3. Sigma 10mm f/2.8 fisheye. Always wanted a fisheye for the distortion. What sets this apart from the older Canon and Sigma 15mm f/2.8 fullframe lenses are the newer generation lens's CA, flare, and halation control.

4. Sigma 30mm f/1.4 or 50mm f/1.4. Need a better large aperture lens, and the 50mm f/1.8 is no longer cutting it. Would get the Canon 50mm f/1.4 or 85mm f/1.8, but wide-open, there are halation issues where these newer gen lens's do not.

Man, photography wasn't supposed to be taken to this extreme... it was supposed to be about the car...
The 11-16 looks very promising!

My next lens is likely to be the 17-55 2.8 IS.
Old 04-18-2008, 10:03 PM
  #11  
surfcity40
New Member
 
surfcity40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 12,329
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

don't be silly.
Old 04-19-2008, 06:02 AM
  #12  
roast
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
roast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Okay, see?
Posts: 4,092
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

+1 on needing a better large aperture lens.... the 50mm 1.8 and its only like $80.... step up to the 50mm 1.4..... honestly I'd rather have the 1.2 L but who wouldnt?



/droool. I think I'm about to buy the 50mm 1.4 myself....

I brought my 10-22 3.5 to work yesterday because my boss wanted to check it out on his 20d.... he had the 85mm 1.8 and I really liked that lens too...

I'm also considering the 100mm 2.8 macro.....
Old 04-19-2008, 08:24 AM
  #13  
leemik
!
iTrader: (2)
 
leemik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: ma
Posts: 2,289
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I'm pretty satisfied with all the lenses i have.. I think my next upgrade will be body.. maybe replace my 20D with a 40D
Old 04-20-2008, 07:33 AM
  #14  
Bubble
-REPLICA ARMY-
iTrader: (50)
 
Bubble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Yorba Linda, CA
Posts: 10,067
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by iStan

Well, It was suppose to be about the car...but now I'm ready to say fawk it, part out car and go big in Photography..
lolz..good choice.
Old 04-20-2008, 07:36 AM
  #15  
Bubble
-REPLICA ARMY-
iTrader: (50)
 
Bubble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Yorba Linda, CA
Posts: 10,067
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by roast
honestly I'd rather have the 1.2 L but who wouldnt? .....
even though this lens is a hit/miss performance but who care.

Old 04-20-2008, 09:58 AM
  #16  
noodleman
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
 
noodleman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,002
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

hmm, does this 11-16 lens compare to the 12-24 tokina lens? Or they're different classes of lenses?
Old 04-20-2008, 10:54 AM
  #17  
ctwentytwo
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
ctwentytwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Waipahu HI; Phoenix AZ
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Bubble
even though this lens is a hit/miss performance but who care.

I've just about nutted all over myself . Goddamn Bubble, 50 & 85 f/1.2! This is like seeing supercars... Ferrari, Lambo, Aston... You pimpin' hoes?

Originally Posted by noodleman
hmm, does this 11-16 lens compare to the 12-24 tokina lens? Or they're different classes of lenses?
Noods, looks like both lenses are "AT-X Pro" designated lenses. I think AT-X Pro is for "push-pull" auto/manual operation instead of a switch. And both are "DX" designated for crop-only lenses.

http://www.thkphoto.com/products/tokina/index.html

Obviously the big ticket is the 11-16's fast f/2.8 aperture compared to the 1 stop disadvantage of the 12-24 at f/4.

The lens is available from Japan eBayers, but you'll have to cough up the $100+ premium to be a first adopter.

I'll definitely be picking up this lens the first chance I get, and ditching the Sigma 10-20 just for the f/2.8. Heck, I don't know how one could justify getting any other UWA as the price and performance is ridiculously low.
Old 04-20-2008, 01:16 PM
  #18  
Bubble
-REPLICA ARMY-
iTrader: (50)
 
Bubble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Yorba Linda, CA
Posts: 10,067
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by ctwentytwo
I've just about nutted all over myself . Goddamn Bubble, 50 & 85 f/1.2! This is like seeing supercars... Ferrari, Lambo, Aston... You pimpin' hoes?
that just nothing. 300 f/2.8IS / 400 f/2.8IS / 500 f/4 IS combo would consider as seeing supercars. I'm missing only 400 f/2.8IS.
Old 04-20-2008, 04:56 PM
  #19  
ctwentytwo
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
ctwentytwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Waipahu HI; Phoenix AZ
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Bubble
that just nothing. 300 f/2.8IS / 400 f/2.8IS / 500 f/4 IS combo would consider as seeing supercars. I'm missing only 400 f/2.8IS.
Again, do you pimp hoes?
Old 04-20-2008, 07:42 PM
  #20  
JustKidding
Registered User
 
JustKidding's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Orlando
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

24-70 2.8L & 70-200 2.8L IS
and some UltraWideAngle goodness, not sure yet


Quick Reply: What lenses are you lusting after?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:18 AM.