Notices

By request, a CJM Stage 0 System.

Old Mar 12, 2009 | 06:56 AM
  #21  
neosoul's Avatar
neosoul
New Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Quincy
Default

Don't know for sure, someone I know solved another EMS hot start problem by tuning the car at 48psi - so i'll let you know.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2009 | 07:28 AM
  #22  
UMW350Z's Avatar
UMW350Z
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,148
Likes: 0
From: Piscataway, NJ
Default

Please do. I'm confident that fi it can be done, my guy will do it. I havn't talked to my tuner about it yet
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2009 | 01:16 PM
  #23  
phunk's Avatar
phunk
Thread Starter
CJ Motorsports
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,997
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
Default

You should definately have improvement in cold starts. The vacuum during cranking will lower pressure and assist in the cold start. Cold start does take extra fuel... But with the stock ecu already handling that, the larger injectors compound that factor and over-do it. The reduction in pressure while cranking will take care of a portion of that
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2009 | 01:48 PM
  #24  
__jb's Avatar
__jb
Z + Rear Seat
Premier Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 0
From: St.Pete,FL
Default

Originally Posted by Hal@IP
The stock system runs constant fuel pressure. One problem with this is when boost rises in the intake plenum and fuel does not you have less fuel to deal with. For example, assuming stock fp is 52 and boost of 20psi, you have 32psi of fuel pressure to work with. Continue now, and take it to the extreme... 52psi fuel pressure and 52psi of boost... no fuel would be injected With a fuel return system (including boost-referenced fuel pressure regulator) you get an extra 1psi of fuel pressure for every 1psi of boost

There is no hard limit where 'you must have a fuel return system' in my opinion as there are a number of ways to setup fuel on a car.
So the boost works against the fuel pressure. That makes perfect sense, now that you've explained it. Since an NA car has no boost to counteract the fuel pressure, it doesn't seem like an NA car would ever need a return fuel system.

Thanks for the explanation, Hal.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2009 | 01:52 PM
  #25  
Chef-J's Avatar
Chef-J
Booooosstt!!
Premier Member
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,311
Likes: 0
From: Dallas/NewYork/Michigan/Korea
Default

sweet!
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2009 | 05:36 PM
  #26  
phunk's Avatar
phunk
Thread Starter
CJ Motorsports
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,997
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
Default

Originally Posted by __jb
So the boost works against the fuel pressure. That makes perfect sense, now that you've explained it. Since an NA car has no boost to counteract the fuel pressure, it doesn't seem like an NA car would ever need a return fuel system.

Thanks for the explanation, Hal.
Correct, an NA car wouldnt need a RFS for increased capacity and what not... however it doesnt still have a slight advantage in the fact that you can tune your fuel pressure!!! this can aid in tuning, and can aid in slight adjustments as climates change and what not. i would often tweak my fuel pressure a psi here or there if my car was running lean or rich for the night.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2009 | 09:00 AM
  #27  
got556's Avatar
got556
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Default

Wow, Charles this is exactly the answer to my thoughts of "Holy Crap I gotta drop $1K on a fuel return system when I MAY not need it for a basic Vortech build." This is awesome and I'll definitely be getting a Stage 0 now when I go Vortech in a month or two. Thanks!
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2009 | 08:45 PM
  #28  
JonnyC's Avatar
JonnyC
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 1
From: WI
Default

Originally Posted by got556
Wow, Charles this is exactly the answer to my thoughts of "Holy Crap I gotta drop $1K on a fuel return system when I MAY not need it for a basic Vortech build."
Haha, I think a lot of us sub-400hp guys were thinking the same thing!
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 10:47 AM
  #29  
frankie945's Avatar
frankie945
Registered User
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
From: louisvile KY
Default

Will deachwerks injectors fit your rails? Thinking of the Stage 1 kit.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2009 | 11:00 AM
  #30  
phunk's Avatar
phunk
Thread Starter
CJ Motorsports
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,997
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
Default

They sure will! We recommend them.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2009 | 07:34 PM
  #31  
JonnyC's Avatar
JonnyC
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 1
From: WI
Default

I just noticed this on JWT's website suggesting that the fuel rails be drilled out for high HP applications - http://www.jimwolftechnology.com/wol...UEL_SYSTEM.pdf

Would you suggest this with the Stage 0 setup? Is there no point to this if you only need to support 400 hp?
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2009 | 09:57 PM
  #32  
phunk's Avatar
phunk
Thread Starter
CJ Motorsports
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,997
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
Default

it definately isnt going to hurt anything, so why not? to increase flow into the rails will only help remove bias in the series layout
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 08:03 PM
  #33  
neosoul's Avatar
neosoul
New Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Quincy
Default

I just got it installed and I must say, it is a lot easier than I imagined - even when I messed up the install the first time lol.

Charles answered all my calls but I think we were both on vacation or something so I can't expect him to make this promise to everyone.

I got a used FPR I bought to troubleshoot my post-install problem (which turned out to be a swirl jet hole size), if anyone wants it - Charles can sell you a kit without an FPR to make it cheaper.

Anyway - I turned my psi way down to fix the hot start problem and this definitely wasn't possible without this kit. I'm doing 44psi without the vacuum line going to the plenum and tuning it that way.

If it's not obvious already, turning down the fuel psi will definitely affect your tune.

My hot start problem is close to 90% gone, I'm sure the last 10% is due to my UTEC 0% column numbers.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 08:11 PM
  #34  
neosoul's Avatar
neosoul
New Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Quincy
Default

Originally Posted by JonnyC
I just noticed this on JWT's website suggesting that the fuel rails be drilled out for high HP applications - http://www.jimwolftechnology.com/wol...UEL_SYSTEM.pdf

Would you suggest this with the Stage 0 setup? Is there no point to this if you only need to support 400 hp?
I'm curious if there's a real point to this since the stage 0 kit uses your stock rail AND your stock fuel feed in it's entirety - including the infamous fuel 'dampener' (http://liljerk.morpheus.net/350Z/fue...s/DSC02348.JPG).

So the real question is, without bypassing the dampener - will there be a point in opening up these rail orifices ?

BTW - the stage 1 bypasses this completely
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 08:17 PM
  #35  
phunk's Avatar
phunk
Thread Starter
CJ Motorsports
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,997
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
Default

glad that the problem was just the jet size!

for those of you that didnt know, when you use a walbro 255lph pump, you need to enlarge the opening in the yellow venturi shown here:



if you do not, your regulator will not be able to adjust fuel pressure where you want it at idle.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 08:46 PM
  #36  
neosoul's Avatar
neosoul
New Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Quincy
Default

Originally Posted by phunk
glad that the problem was just the jet size!

for those of you that didnt know, when you use a walbro 255lph pump, you need to enlarge the opening in the yellow venturi shown here:



if you do not, your regulator will not be able to adjust fuel pressure where you want it at idle.
lol - up late as always, I owe you pix which I WILL get soon. Gotta get under the car for you
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 08:48 PM
  #37  
neosoul's Avatar
neosoul
New Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Quincy
Default

btw, the problem was my bit sizes were marked retardedly. I found that my 5/64 bit was the correct one to use (5/64 = 0.078125)
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2009 | 11:19 PM
  #38  
phunk's Avatar
phunk
Thread Starter
CJ Motorsports
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,997
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
Default

how low are you able to get the pressure at idle now with that size? i would figure mid 30s if not lower

i should add that 5/64 to the how-to for the walbro, since a lot of people have PMd me with trouble finding a bit since i list it in decimal
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2009 | 12:32 PM
  #39  
__jb's Avatar
__jb
Z + Rear Seat
Premier Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 0
From: St.Pete,FL
Default


(not my car)

I see a lot of you guys running a small fuel pressure gauge on an adapter under the hood. I've been thinking about doing that to see what my fuel pressure is.

I looked on the CJM site, but couldn't find a search tool or a fuel pressure gauge. Will any fuel pressure gauge work? I'm thinking the vibrations and heat might be pretty hard on a gauge mounted directly to the engine.

Any recommendations?
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2009 | 01:25 PM
  #40  
phunk's Avatar
phunk
Thread Starter
CJ Motorsports
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,997
Likes: 3
From: West Chicago, IL
Default

ya we actually do not sell anything for only installing a fuel pressure gauge such as in that picture. unless you have made changes to your fuel system, your fuel pressure will still be at stock
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:53 AM.