GT Motorsports: G37S VVEL Twin Turbo, 4.5L Stroker, MoTeC, SEMA '07 Project Car
#63
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Lawrencville,NJ
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kenk2
I'll take a 700 AWD WHP car any day over a half G35/Toyota Solara
heheheh...they threatened to ban me on the G37 forum for that solara comment...
I have an 04 6mt G35 and can't bring myself to trade it in for a G37...I'd love to FI my car but I have 110k miles on it.
#64
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: RC, CA
Posts: 1,323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by da45king
heheheh...they threatened to ban me on the G37 forum for that solara comment...
I have an 04 6mt G35 and can't bring myself to trade it in for a G37...I'd love to FI my car but I have 110k miles on it.
I have an 04 6mt G35 and can't bring myself to trade it in for a G37...I'd love to FI my car but I have 110k miles on it.
then along with the FI you should build the motor!
#69
UltimateSleeper
iTrader: (2)
Originally Posted by Resolute
The variable lift has a seperate DC motor for adjusting relative ball nut placement on the screw shaft, altering the control shaft position which determines control cam height. The timing adjustment is still based on solenoid-controlled oil pressure through the cam gear CVTC adjuster. The Motec M600 already offers the CVTC adjustment and drive-by-wire, so I am holding out hope that control of the DC Motor as a function of load/rpm in the tuning map will not be too big an obstacle. For us NA guys, this VVeL is very exciting to see. I am hesitant to guess at higher rpm use with the configuration's weight, but it is still exciting. I think GTM being a Motec tuner is a great step, and opens up more potential for what they will be able to extract from this system.
Will
Will
#70
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: .
Posts: 2,071
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by da45king
heheheh...they threatened to ban me on the G37 forum for that solara comment...
.
#71
New Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Riyadh, SA
Posts: 1,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by George@GTM
Will,
We are very excited to get the MoTeC running on this platform. Sam recently attended a MoTeC class along with Sharif and he is very impressed with the system and their philosophy. Keep in mind their will only be a handleful of people using this type of EMS on the VQ.
More than likely we will be using the M800 with a few added options. I am not sure on the VVeL control with the MoTeC but If anything can control it, it would be a MoTeC system.
We have a lot of products for the HR (Cams are already available) and coming soon for the VVeL engine.
I will try to keep everything updated with pictures and videos to share with the community as much as possible.
Thanks for your comments everyone, We really appreciate your support because with out our valued customers we could not make this possible.
-George
GT Motorsports
We are very excited to get the MoTeC running on this platform. Sam recently attended a MoTeC class along with Sharif and he is very impressed with the system and their philosophy. Keep in mind their will only be a handleful of people using this type of EMS on the VQ.
More than likely we will be using the M800 with a few added options. I am not sure on the VVeL control with the MoTeC but If anything can control it, it would be a MoTeC system.
We have a lot of products for the HR (Cams are already available) and coming soon for the VVeL engine.
I will try to keep everything updated with pictures and videos to share with the community as much as possible.
Thanks for your comments everyone, We really appreciate your support because with out our valued customers we could not make this possible.
-George
GT Motorsports
#72
UltimateSleeper
iTrader: (2)
Originally Posted by aalzuhair
It will control the VVeL and I would go with the M880, you will love it ... I did
#73
New Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Riyadh, SA
Posts: 1,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GurgenPB
I would not do the 880, the harness is a REAL pain to work with, and no different feature-wise from the 800 (as far as I remember). Simon himself recommended I don't.
#75
でたらめ検出器
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by da45king
heheheh...they threatened to ban me on the G37 forum for that solara comment...
Anyway... I can't believe how quickly GTM is able to do R&D, let alone a monster build on a G37 before any substantial inventory has even arrived at most Infiniti dealership lots!!! You guys never cease to amaze me, LOL! I'm very interested to see the results of this build Sam & George!!! While I'm having trouble getting past the exterior styling, there is no denying the superior performance and power potential of the G37 powertrain. Now I better understand Sam's response to my last PM inquiring about doing a custom GTM turbo setup for the DE motor. It looks like you have your hands full before SEMA.
BTW, have you guys looked into the possibility of a powertrain swap into a G35 or Z? I would love to have that new engine. Can it physically be done?
Last edited by RudeG_v2.0; 09-03-2007 at 10:35 PM.
#76
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (12)
Originally Posted by rr_z33
anyhow my question still stands. will we be able to use the 4.5 stroker parts(crank pistons etc) with the old vq35de? or will it not be compatible?
Thanks,
-George
GT Motorsports
#77
Originally Posted by aalzuhair
Well yeah they are about the same except for the 4mb logging option. And its kind of strange for Simon not to recommend the M880, ... I see no reason for that ... At any rate I guess the the M800 will do or even the M600
You could use an M600 to control a VQ, but the M800's additional connections can be useful for, among other things, running high-low injectors.
#78
UltimateSleeper
iTrader: (2)
Originally Posted by MacGuffin
The newer MoTeC ACL (Advanced Central Logger) is a much better data logging option than even the M880; so the advantage the M880 held over the M800 isn't so much of an advantage anymore, and the M880 connector is still a pain to work with. Bottom line, prefer the M800 to the M880, and get the ACL if you need that much data logging capability.
You could use an M600 to control a VQ, but the M800's additional connections can be useful for, among other things, running high-low injectors.
You could use an M600 to control a VQ, but the M800's additional connections can be useful for, among other things, running high-low injectors.
M800 is a definite advantage over the M600 since it comes with the advanced functions option, which if purchased with the M600 would pout it withing $200 of the M800, hence the latter is the way to go.
#80
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: King of Materbation
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GurgenPB
Not to mention compatibility with any future cars that you can use it in. That's wy Motec is so appealing, you can use it on your next car!
M800 is a definite advantage over the M600 since it comes with the advanced functions option, which if purchased with the M600 would pout it withing $200 of the M800, hence the latter is the way to go.
M800 is a definite advantage over the M600 since it comes with the advanced functions option, which if purchased with the M600 would pout it withing $200 of the M800, hence the latter is the way to go.
The m600 also is only compatible with 4 and 6 cyclinders. The 800 is good for 4,6 and 8 cyclinder vehicles.