350z, S2000, MustangGT dyno day at Church. RESULTS!
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Sherman Oaks, CA.
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
350z, S2000, MustangGT dyno day at Church. RESULTS!
So the three of us went down to Church this morning and had all three cars run to get a FRESH baseline for the next mods stage.
The cars...
2006 Mustang GT (flowmaster catback, reflash, cold air intake)
[my] 2003 350z (JIC Y-Pipe, Apex exhaust, u/d pulley, JWT intake, grounding wires)
2004 S2000 (bone stock)
Attached are the scans from my 350z. For bandwidth reasons I'll just post the GTs and S2s numbers. According to Church drop around 10-15hp to get your average dynojet score. Now of course we all know how varied dynojets can be due to setup and tire sizes. Hence why I prefer the dynopack. I like knowing what my axles are truly spinning!
As you can see from my AF I am running lean now right at 4k crusing range. Hmmmm....oh and it was exactly 68 degrees outside with 40% humidity.
Mustang GT: 303hp, 311tq
S2000: 235hp, 165tq
Video of my car:
https://my350z.com/forum/showthread....67#post2235367
The cars...
2006 Mustang GT (flowmaster catback, reflash, cold air intake)
[my] 2003 350z (JIC Y-Pipe, Apex exhaust, u/d pulley, JWT intake, grounding wires)
2004 S2000 (bone stock)
Attached are the scans from my 350z. For bandwidth reasons I'll just post the GTs and S2s numbers. According to Church drop around 10-15hp to get your average dynojet score. Now of course we all know how varied dynojets can be due to setup and tire sizes. Hence why I prefer the dynopack. I like knowing what my axles are truly spinning!
As you can see from my AF I am running lean now right at 4k crusing range. Hmmmm....oh and it was exactly 68 degrees outside with 40% humidity.
Mustang GT: 303hp, 311tq
S2000: 235hp, 165tq
Video of my car:
https://my350z.com/forum/showthread....67#post2235367
Last edited by Mr_Q; 03-26-2006 at 04:12 PM.
#3
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Sherman Oaks, CA.
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Fa1rLadyZ
wow 235hp from stock s2k? seems really high
And don't forget this is power at the hubs, not the wheels.
#4
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Socal.
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr_Q
Every 2004+ S2 they've tested has consistantly posted 20 more hp than the earlier models. Honda is under rating the new ones.
And don't forget this is power at the hubs, not the wheels.
And don't forget this is power at the hubs, not the wheels.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
m_0g
Audio, Video & Electronics (DIY)
12
06-03-2021 10:05 AM