Ideal A/F value?
My question; what is the ideal A/F ratio for a N/A Z?
I've done quite a bit of searching and never found a real soild answer.
My dyno graphs seem to point that 13.0 is ideal, and i've seen a few people say that 12.1 is good.
I've done quite a bit of searching and never found a real soild answer.
My dyno graphs seem to point that 13.0 is ideal, and i've seen a few people say that 12.1 is good.
Originally Posted by Alberto
13.0-13.5:1 is ideal NA for the Z. 12:1 is too rich NA. My car makes good power at a perfect 13:1 NA across the board...
Thanks, I'll shoot for that.
you want to run a bit richer on f/i'ed cars. cylinder pressures and heat is higher for f/i. richening it up will help slow the flame front and combustion will be a tad cooler.
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by oo_snoopy

Every car, depending on mods, temp, elavation, etc...its going to make peak power at a different AF ratio. The last couple of NA cars we tuned responded best at 12.0:1 with more power and curve across the board. Remember that AF ratio is also effected by timing advance, so both timing and fuel need to balanced, and there isnt necessarily a BEST AF ratio. It needs to be discussed in relation to the timing profile, and also the type of fuel you are running. But as a general rule...12.0 to 13.0 is going to be a good range to target.
Originally Posted by Sharif@Forged
Every car, depending on mods, temp, elavation, etc...its going to make peak power at a different AF ratio. The last couple of NA cars we tuned responded best at 12.0:1 with more power and curve across the board. Remember that AF ratio is also effected by timing advance, so both timing and fuel need to balanced, and there isnt necessarily a BEST AF ratio. It needs to be discussed in relation to the timing profile, and also the type of fuel you are running. But as a general rule...12.0 to 13.0 is going to be a good range to target.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FromGtoZ
Intake Exhaust
2
Sep 20, 2015 03:41 PM
MustGoFastR
Intake Exhaust
11
Oct 14, 2003 02:05 PM





