Notices
Tuning Reflashes, Piggybacks, Standalone ECUs

For everyone against the SAFC2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 8, 2008 | 10:36 AM
  #21  
UpRev's Avatar
UpRev
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,095
Likes: 0
From: Austin TX
Default

No bashing. There is fact behind people saying the things they say about the product.

FACT: The SAFC is a fair enough choice on a car that does not have a learning ECU.

FACT: The pricing was reasonable when stand alone and piggy back units started at over $1500 a few years ago.

FACT: Butt dynos don't prove anything.

FACT: It is cheaper and better to buy a base flash tune for a Nissan 2003 and newer than use a SAFC.

FACT: No one cares about proof when their friends tell them it's good.

FACT: Few people will read this post and then search for other posts on the subject.

FACT: I started this post at 10am when I got in this morning but didn't finish it till 1:40pm
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2008 | 11:57 AM
  #22  
aggietsi's Avatar
aggietsi
New Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
From: Royse City, TX
Default

OP, there's no reason to keep saying "delete thread".

If you really feel that you've made a difference, make your adjustments, dyno, leave the settings alone for a while, follow up. If you made power and kept it, no worries.

I don't think Z1 and UpRev need to push their products so badly that they're going to deface Apex'i. I've used the SAFC, SAFCII, and SAFC NEO on a few different cars. I agree that they're good basic tuning tools, it just makes sense that the Z's ECU is a little too complex.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2008 | 12:20 PM
  #23  
gothchick's Avatar
gothchick
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,300
Likes: 1
From: ATL
Default

Originally Posted by silver350tn
delete this thread
Haha! This chit is funny~ :-)
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2008 | 09:20 PM
  #24  
silver350tn's Avatar
silver350tn
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: Franklin, TN
Default

well my plans are to use the safc untill i get my forged internals in and then get a utec and get a good stable tune but untill then i guess i am relying on my butt dyno lol... i love this forum and just for everyones information the stock ecu has yet to override my corrections. almost a week and still no change. daily settings from -3 to -7% and hi throttle settings -16% across the board starting at 3,400 rpm. its still there i checked today. i zeroed out my hi throttle settings and watched my wideband hit 15-16 at wot. i put it back to the -16% and it stayed from 11.0-12.0 so i guess i am still waiting on it to correct itself
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2008 | 12:25 PM
  #25  
RBlover69's Avatar
RBlover69
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,995
Likes: 0
From: Whorelando
Default

def never trusted a SAFC , but even with utec holding a tune has been hella hard from what i been seeing. I wonder if uprevs solution is the best solution na for cost.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2008 | 06:39 AM
  #26  
zguy825's Avatar
zguy825
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
From: Nasy Nati
Default

OP, I appreciate your notes on the product. I have NA mods and will be NA for another year or so, looking for a decent inexpensive alternative to something that I have to have professionally tuned. Seems like your notes are good and I would love to hear some continuing updates on your situation. Thanks!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
travismaser
Engine & Drivetrain
144
Apr 29, 2012 12:54 AM
Ddc665
Forced Induction
2
Dec 17, 2009 03:04 PM
FairladyZ34
Tuning
13
Nov 8, 2009 11:34 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:47 AM.