Utec Question
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Harrisonburg VA
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://my350z.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
This is not the typical stupid question that all the newbs have.
Utec is installed on a turbocharged vehicle. Map sensor is also installed. Car has 600cc dw injectors and an adj. fpr with a return fuel system. Base fuel pressure set to 50 psi. Maf sensor is in a 3 inch housing. Utec also has the latest firmware flashed.
Base map that is uploaded to the utec is from TurboXS is the APS 550cc map as well as the parameters. With the values unchanged in the 0% column the vehicle starts right up and idles. According to my wideband a/f ratio reads a consistent 11.1 which is rich.
Now the problem arrises with the 0% column. No matter how much more fuel is subtracted it has no effect on the a/f ratio at idle. If you input a new value all the way across the board, save the changes, the idle bumps down and then back up and the a/f returns back to 11.1. If too much fuel is subtracted, the car dies and has a hard time starting back up. MIL comes on for p300 (multiple cylinder misfire). If the code is cleared, add a little more fuel onto the map and the car starts back up again and returns to the same a/f ratio.
Also Dave bumped to base idle to 900 rpm and that made the car idle a little better but with the same a/f ratio. He tried to lower the base fuel pressure as well and that had little effect as well.
Any ideas what is causing this issue? I had the car towed to Function Tuned and Dave had this issue. I never tried to get the a/f at idle to a normal value while the car was in my garage due to the reason that it was getting tuned anyway. But Dave spent a couple of hours on the car and at the end of the day I ended up leaving with the vehicle in the same state as I got it there.
thanks...
Utec is installed on a turbocharged vehicle. Map sensor is also installed. Car has 600cc dw injectors and an adj. fpr with a return fuel system. Base fuel pressure set to 50 psi. Maf sensor is in a 3 inch housing. Utec also has the latest firmware flashed.
Base map that is uploaded to the utec is from TurboXS is the APS 550cc map as well as the parameters. With the values unchanged in the 0% column the vehicle starts right up and idles. According to my wideband a/f ratio reads a consistent 11.1 which is rich.
Now the problem arrises with the 0% column. No matter how much more fuel is subtracted it has no effect on the a/f ratio at idle. If you input a new value all the way across the board, save the changes, the idle bumps down and then back up and the a/f returns back to 11.1. If too much fuel is subtracted, the car dies and has a hard time starting back up. MIL comes on for p300 (multiple cylinder misfire). If the code is cleared, add a little more fuel onto the map and the car starts back up again and returns to the same a/f ratio.
Also Dave bumped to base idle to 900 rpm and that made the car idle a little better but with the same a/f ratio. He tried to lower the base fuel pressure as well and that had little effect as well.
Any ideas what is causing this issue? I had the car towed to Function Tuned and Dave had this issue. I never tried to get the a/f at idle to a normal value while the car was in my garage due to the reason that it was getting tuned anyway. But Dave spent a couple of hours on the car and at the end of the day I ended up leaving with the vehicle in the same state as I got it there.
thanks...
#2
New Member
iTrader: (4)
![Default](https://my350z.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
This might be a silly question, but are you positive that the map selector switch is on the same position as the map which you are making changes to? In other words, if you are working on map #1, make sure the switch is set to #1. It also shows which position the switch is on if you look at the UTEC dashboard.
Other than that, your 0% column should be somewhere between -10 and -20 throughout. Even if you just get it close, the stock computer's A/F compensations should get it close to 14.7.
Other than that, your 0% column should be somewhere between -10 and -20 throughout. Even if you just get it close, the stock computer's A/F compensations should get it close to 14.7.
#4
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 2,252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://my350z.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
So what value are you putting on the 0% column? did you try to reset the ECU before you made the changes? I find disconnecting the battery for 10 mins better than doing the pedal reset.
#6
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Harrisonburg VA
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://my350z.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have Not tried to reset the ecu. However the values that are in the 0% column are -15 all the way down. I'll take a snap shot of the screen.
Could it be a maf issue because after a certain point the car would enter limp mode and not rev past 2400rpm.
Could it be a maf issue because after a certain point the car would enter limp mode and not rev past 2400rpm.
#7
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Harrisonburg VA
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://my350z.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
By calibrating do you mean doing the Idle relearn position?
that is my next step is to install the maf back into the original housing to see what happens.
Trending Topics
#8
New Member
iTrader: (4)
![Default](https://my350z.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It sounds like the changes aren't taking effect until the car is restarted (and the UTEC is re-booted). If I recall, every time I saved changes on my UTEC the engine would die and I would have to re-start it. In the process of doing so I would turn the key off and then back on so the UTEC would re-boot. Maybe try that?
It's also possible that your wideband is giving false readings. What type of wideband are you using?
It's also possible that your wideband is giving false readings. What type of wideband are you using?
#11
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Harrisonburg VA
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://my350z.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Seems like everybody is suggesting to put the stock maf housing back in. Guess I will do that first and see what happens then.
BTW my wideband is dead accurate with the device that was used to measure the a/f on the dyno.
And the stock ecu was not reflashed in any form. I assumed that it would be able to compensate for the added difference in diameter (2.70 inches stock vs 3.0 inches) for the airflow.
BTW my wideband is dead accurate with the device that was used to measure the a/f on the dyno.
And the stock ecu was not reflashed in any form. I assumed that it would be able to compensate for the added difference in diameter (2.70 inches stock vs 3.0 inches) for the airflow.
#13
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
![Default](https://my350z.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Seems like everybody is suggesting to put the stock maf housing back in. Guess I will do that first and see what happens then.
BTW my wideband is dead accurate with the device that was used to measure the a/f on the dyno.
And the stock ecu was not reflashed in any form. I assumed that it would be able to compensate for the added difference in diameter (2.70 inches stock vs 3.0 inches) for the airflow.
BTW my wideband is dead accurate with the device that was used to measure the a/f on the dyno.
And the stock ecu was not reflashed in any form. I assumed that it would be able to compensate for the added difference in diameter (2.70 inches stock vs 3.0 inches) for the airflow.
#14
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 2,252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://my350z.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It sounds like the changes aren't taking effect until the car is restarted (and the UTEC is re-booted). If I recall, every time I saved changes on my UTEC the engine would die and I would have to re-start it. In the process of doing so I would turn the key off and then back on so the UTEC would re-boot. Maybe try that?
It's also possible that your wideband is giving false readings. What type of wideband are you using?
It's also possible that your wideband is giving false readings. What type of wideband are you using?
#15
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 2,252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://my350z.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
keep it simple.. put back the stock MAF housing and troubleshoot from there. Once fully warmed up the car should be in close loop so the 02 sensor should correct it. Since he has a big injector, the ECU is probably going crazy trying to correct it.
#16
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Harrisonburg VA
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://my350z.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
And there is no cel until the car gets in normal operating temp. After that the car enters limp mode and wont rev past 2400rpm. As soon as the p300 code is cleared, the car runs fine but still rich.
You are correct. The primary o2 sensors are reading rich.
#17
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Harrisonburg VA
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://my350z.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Before putting in the stock maf housing I decided to give the 0% column some adjustments. So I imputed -19 all the way down. A/f stayed at 10.9-11.1. Car ran and then shut off. I started it up and the code for IAT sensor came on.
#19
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Harrisonburg VA
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://my350z.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Looking through the fsm, this is what I found
“Short term fuel trim” is the short-term fuel compensation used to maintain the mixture ratio at its theoretical value. The signal from heated oxygen sensor 1 indicates whether the mixture ratio is RICH or LEAN compared to the theoretical value. The signal then triggers a reduction in fuel volume if the mixture ratio is rich, and an increase in fuel volume if it is lean.
So technically it also can be the primary o2 sensors besides the maf?
I have a spare maf that I will use today to see if that does the trick.
“Short term fuel trim” is the short-term fuel compensation used to maintain the mixture ratio at its theoretical value. The signal from heated oxygen sensor 1 indicates whether the mixture ratio is RICH or LEAN compared to the theoretical value. The signal then triggers a reduction in fuel volume if the mixture ratio is rich, and an increase in fuel volume if it is lean.
So technically it also can be the primary o2 sensors besides the maf?
I have a spare maf that I will use today to see if that does the trick.