Notices
Tuning Reflashes, Piggybacks, Standalone ECUs

Variable cam tuning Intake / Exhaust w/dyno charts, Tuners please step in

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 26, 2012 | 03:41 PM
  #1  
SurraTT's Avatar
SurraTT
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 253
Likes: 2
From: Greensboro, NC
Default Variable cam tuning Intake / Exhaust w/dyno charts, Tuners please step in

There is just not a whole lot of info on variable cam tuning.


Straight out of the FSM

Intake valve timing- "This makes it possible to control the shut/open timing of the intake
valve to increase engine torque in low/mid speed range and output in high-speed range."

Exhaust valve timing- " This makes it possible to control the shut/open timing of the exhaust
valve to increase engine torque and output in a range of high engine speed."



Here is a dyno graph, i just did this testing this past Thursday.


Name:  camtesting.jpg
Views: 3285
Size:  155.3 KB



Name:  camtestzoom.jpg
Views: 1866
Size:  144.2 KB


So as you can see EVT is good for in mid range and high. Meanwhile IVT def has a huge impact on midrange power.


My biggest concern is EVT, im running 11-9 degrees of advancement and its making ~5 hp more than with EVT off at 6k+. The stock haltech map puts EVT on 15 degrees i reduced it because i was kinda confused and thought EVT was for low end power. So i need to put mine back on stock 15 degrees.



Can any VQ35 tuners step and and help out here?

What are the limits? Can you cause valve damage if you advance the cams too much at high rpm? or any rpm really? (Ive assumed that the variable system on VQ's its impossible to cause damage as they dont move that much) but i could be totally wrong. This is why im posting here.


What is the range of IVT and EVT? IVT is 40degrees, and EVT is 30???


The stock haltech runs 15 advancement on EVT from 3500+ would 20, 25 make more top end power?


Is cam timing tuning where you make the TQ line flatter? (not falling off a lot after 5500)?





Does anyone have any back to back variable cam testing graphs? I really didn't find much at all. other than a low compression built motor.

Last edited by SurraTT; Feb 26, 2012 at 03:47 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2012 | 05:44 AM
  #2  
djamps's Avatar
djamps
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,492
Likes: 10
From: MD
Default

All I know is what you already posted pretty much... intake cam advance improves low/mid power up to a certain RPM where it actually can start hurting power.. thats why the charts usually zero out the intake cam advance some time before redline. Exhaust cam advance increases top end power.. no experience here because I have a non-revup DE. Adjust each to get the best overall power figure.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2012 | 07:29 AM
  #3  
SurraTT's Avatar
SurraTT
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 253
Likes: 2
From: Greensboro, NC
Default

Originally Posted by djamps
All I know is what you already posted pretty much... intake cam advance improves low/mid power up to a certain RPM where it actually can start hurting power.. thats why the charts usually zero out the intake cam advance some time before redline. Exhaust cam advance increases top end power.. no experience here because I have a non-revup DE. Adjust each to get the best overall power figure.

Haha yeah, im trying to see whats up with some cars having a flatter tq curve, with not a lot of mods and def not built. And i want to know the limits, if i get on the dyno and mess with cam timing can i cause valve damage?
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2012 | 12:26 PM
  #4  
SurraTT's Avatar
SurraTT
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 253
Likes: 2
From: Greensboro, NC
Default

OK i called JWT to get some info as they are def up on VQ cam stuff!

Clark helped me out a lot! He really knows what real customer service is about!


Some good notes:

IVT- old motors have 40 degrees advancement, the newer HR head system has 50 degrees of advancement.


EVT- old (rev up) 30 degrees, new HR is 40 degrees. This is actually retarding the cam.



There can be no valve damage done with stock cams and stock piston setup!!!!!!!!!!! Which i was pretty sure that was the case but its good to know!
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2012 | 01:02 PM
  #5  
Kwame's Avatar
Kwame
New Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (78)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,219
Likes: 19
From: New York
Default

Nice
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2012 | 01:42 PM
  #6  
SurraTT's Avatar
SurraTT
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 253
Likes: 2
From: Greensboro, NC
Default

Name:  camatiming.jpg
Views: 1955
Size:  194.2 KB





Cam timing tuning. Messed around a little. 20 21 is Intake adjustments only, 23 is exhaust adjusted also.

Had great gains, at 5500 rpm 11hp and 10ftlbs.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2012 | 07:52 PM
  #7  
djamps's Avatar
djamps
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,492
Likes: 10
From: MD
Default

Advancing intake cams at lower RPM's helped with my turbo spool.
Reply
Old May 3, 2012 | 12:27 PM
  #8  
kacz07's Avatar
kacz07
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,936
Likes: 4
From: NJ
Default

What gear? Engine? Mods?
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2012 | 02:46 PM
  #9  
SurraTT's Avatar
SurraTT
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 253
Likes: 2
From: Greensboro, NC
Default

Originally Posted by kacz07
What gear? Engine? Mods?

02 maxima, 09 maxima motor (HR heads DE block), stock internal motor, headers, intake, haltech
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2012 | 02:45 PM
  #10  
binder's Avatar
binder
New Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 7
From: terre haute, IN; STL, MO
Default

nice info.

The first graph shows 10:1 a/f ratio between 4000-4600 with the 2 lowest torque pulls. This low of an a/f on a NA engine is crazy rich and would cause a huge hit in midrange torque and power. Because of that it's hard to compare what the midrange torque loss or gain would be since the a/f on 2 of the runs wasn't in the same range that the other 2 are. A/f swing that huge makes a huge power difference. heck, just between 11.8 and down to just under 11:1 change lost quite a bit of power for me.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2012 | 06:13 PM
  #11  
SurraTT's Avatar
SurraTT
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 253
Likes: 2
From: Greensboro, NC
Default

Originally Posted by binder
nice info.

The first graph shows 10:1 a/f ratio between 4000-4600 with the 2 lowest torque pulls. This low of an a/f on a NA engine is crazy rich and would cause a huge hit in midrange torque and power. Because of that it's hard to compare what the midrange torque loss or gain would be since the a/f on 2 of the runs wasn't in the same range that the other 2 are. A/f swing that huge makes a huge power difference. heck, just between 11.8 and down to just under 11:1 change lost quite a bit of power for me.


Yeah that was when i totally turned IVT off. But from 5500+ its a much closer afr.

The best thing is seeing what EVT done to top end power. I have since tuned EVT more and I think its making even more power with just evt alone now.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2012 | 07:56 PM
  #12  
binder's Avatar
binder
New Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 7
From: terre haute, IN; STL, MO
Default

Originally Posted by SurraTT
Yeah that was when i totally turned IVT off. But from 5500+ its a much closer afr.

The best thing is seeing what EVT done to top end power. I have since tuned EVT more and I think its making even more power with just evt alone now.
ya, i don't have evt on my DE unfortunately.

I see your second graph has the a/f nice and smooth between runs. Good gains in just cam timing adjustment!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MM'08_350Z
VQ35HR
225
Apr 22, 2021 09:42 PM
Colombo
Forced Induction
35
Nov 9, 2020 10:27 AM
KOF
Tuning
5
Sep 30, 2015 04:09 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:16 AM.