Notices
Tuning Reflashes, Piggybacks, Standalone ECUs

Rear O2 function and input

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-12-2012, 06:06 AM
  #81  
mgrotel
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
mgrotel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: earth
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

and you mention full standalone, i was heavily considering going with aem for tuning, but tuners on here said it did not work well

i would put cats on, but i need to get the hot nitrous burn out of my engine as fast as i can. i had cats on a nitrous motor before and i had bad heat problems. i will also have a cutout before the muffler, so it would be silly to have cats and then a cutout, since getting the exhaust out as fast as i can is a priority.

Last edited by mgrotel; 04-12-2012 at 06:07 AM.
Old 04-12-2012, 06:41 AM
  #82  
djamps
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
djamps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: MD
Posts: 4,492
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

the rear o2's still work without cats when u put them in the exhaust flow. The emissions control gets upset (catalyst codes) but that's it. A/F's are good.

When it's time to pass emissions testing in an obd2 state like MD I put the non-foulers (extensions) back on, enable all emissions codes, drive for 20 miles or so and it passes. It usually takes 50-300 miles until lean codes trip with anti foulers; plenty of time to get thru emissions with flying colors LOL.

Last edited by djamps; 04-12-2012 at 06:42 AM.
Old 04-12-2012, 11:18 AM
  #83  
Neimad
Registered User
 
Neimad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Oakland
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I have to actually see the cats when I do CA inspection, interesting. Plus I know the smell of a bad cat and a missing cat is worse, EVO guy tried sneak one through once. There is a new OBD II+CAN based smog testing machine coming that I'm pretty sure can detect reprogramming. It will finally read VIN's too. Even my pocket scanner can do that but not my BAR97 POS.

Can you look at your datastream and see if the ECU is still doing the lean/rich injector pulse width switching? I'm thinking there is a default mode that I was never told about.
Old 04-12-2012, 01:06 PM
  #84  
djamps
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
djamps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: MD
Posts: 4,492
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

The o2's definitely still cycle. Luckily in MD they don't really do much in terms of visual...

Last edited by djamps; 04-12-2012 at 01:38 PM.
Old 04-17-2012, 10:49 AM
  #85  
F2CMaDMaXX
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
F2CMaDMaXX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Oregon from England
Posts: 1,751
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

So, although not what you asked for, djamps, i did logging on the way to work this morning. It was only about 10 minutes of constant on the freeway, but i saw the A/F's sitting stead about 14.4.

How long constantly cruising do you have to travel before you start seeing the problem? based on your logs.
Old 04-17-2012, 11:57 AM
  #86  
djamps
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
djamps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: MD
Posts: 4,492
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by F2CMaDMaXX
So, although not what you asked for, djamps, i did logging on the way to work this morning. It was only about 10 minutes of constant on the freeway, but i saw the A/F's sitting stead about 14.4.

How long constantly cruising do you have to travel before you start seeing the problem? based on your logs.
Usually took at least 30 miles until it started happening, I think all the emissions systems have to be in a 'ready' state.

But please tell what year of Z/G you have. We already have evidence that not all years/models behave the same way.
Old 04-17-2012, 12:10 PM
  #87  
mgrotel
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
mgrotel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: earth
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i will log mine too when i get it running right
Old 04-17-2012, 05:34 PM
  #88  
F2CMaDMaXX
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
F2CMaDMaXX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Oregon from England
Posts: 1,751
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

30 miles constant? wow, ok, so that's going to be quite the specific condition, i'm assuming you mean constant without any changes at all in that time?

I'm running an '04.5
Old 04-18-2012, 05:24 AM
  #89  
djamps
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
djamps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: MD
Posts: 4,492
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by F2CMaDMaXX
30 miles constant? wow, ok, so that's going to be quite the specific condition, i'm assuming you mean constant without any changes at all in that time?

I'm running an '04.5
I don't know about constant... whatever it takes to get all the systems 'ready' state like you're about to try to pass emissions.

rear o2 behavior confirmed on an 06.

Last edited by djamps; 04-18-2012 at 05:31 AM.
Old 04-18-2012, 06:24 AM
  #90  
str8dum1
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
str8dum1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: raleigh-wood NC
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

according to the FSM (EC-58) you need almost 11 minutes of constant 53-60mph cruising.

Speed must be in that range.
Old 04-18-2012, 07:32 AM
  #91  
F2CMaDMaXX
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
F2CMaDMaXX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Oregon from England
Posts: 1,751
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by djamps
I don't know about constant... whatever it takes to get all the systems 'ready' state like you're about to try to pass emissions.

rear o2 behavior confirmed on an 06.
The ready state is a one time thing. Once they're ready/reporting, they don't have to do that again the next time the car is started.
Old 04-18-2012, 07:36 AM
  #92  
F2CMaDMaXX
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
F2CMaDMaXX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Oregon from England
Posts: 1,751
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by str8dum1
according to the FSM (EC-58) you need almost 11 minutes of constant 53-60mph cruising.

Speed must be in that range.
Reading now, thanks.
Old 04-18-2012, 09:36 AM
  #93  
F2CMaDMaXX
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
F2CMaDMaXX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Oregon from England
Posts: 1,751
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Hmm, would like to kind of merge these two threads really, some good info in the other one.

There does seem to be an easier way to re-produce. We don't know if it happens on all cars, but i'd love to know if i can repro it on mine.
Old 04-18-2012, 12:37 PM
  #94  
djamps
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
djamps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: MD
Posts: 4,492
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

If disconnecting the rear o2's actually does stabilize things it might be the best thing to do if you have test pipes.

I wonder if them off/unheated in the hot exhaust could damage or foul them up them over time though.

Last edited by djamps; 04-18-2012 at 12:38 PM.
Old 04-18-2012, 04:15 PM
  #95  
F2CMaDMaXX
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
F2CMaDMaXX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Oregon from England
Posts: 1,751
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Well, they're in extenders/anti-foulers, so i'd doubt it. Being in the cold exhaust would be the only thing, but again, doesn't make sense to.
Old 04-24-2012, 01:04 PM
  #96  
Andrei
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Andrei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Planet Kolob
Posts: 1,251
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by djamps
This all came about when I was troubleshooting the exact symptom I described -- too rich sometimes, **** mpg's, ECU overcorrecting and throwing lean codes on both banks. After doing the usual and passing with flying colors (smoke test intake and exhaust), I took extended drives and logs with and without nonfoulers. As a self-tuner I'm extremely **** about my tune and this was driving me crazy. I was relieved to discover the 'problem' was really so simple.

As you can guess, the non-foulers stayed off my car and never had a code or overfueling since. Went from <18mpg to 25+ on the freeway and the car is noticeably more peppy at part throttle.
I am having this 04.5 issue which has led me to believe the 04.5 and anything below 04.5 is a piece of ****. Not using non-foulers throws a SES light on my car. If I use 90 degree non-foulers it overcorrects for a lean condition. If I use straight and drilled non-foulers it overcorrects for lean condition again BUT WITH NO CODES - at least that's what I think is happening because it runs shitty as if there is codes.

I have an 05 6 speed sedan with a full Non-Revup swap, new 04.5 ECM and new harness. The Revup ECM never complained like a ***** and took non-foulers and ran hard with no codes and it was ready for full on power after a reset and pulling out of the driveway unlike this 04.5 one which continues to SEVERELY **** me off.

Originally Posted by djamps
If disconnecting the rear o2's actually does stabilize things it might be the best thing to do if you have test pipes.

I wonder if them off/unheated in the hot exhaust could damage or foul them up them over time though.
I tried it, it doesn't work. Still runs shitty. But I forgot to clear learned fuel trims.

This is the amount of codes that come up when they are disconnected. Worse than a German car.
P0139,02 Sensor Circuit Slow Response (Bank 1 Sensor 2)
**********
P0159,02 Sensor Circuit Slow Response (Bank 2 Sensor 2)
**********
P1146,Heated O2 Sensor 2
**********
P1166,Heated O2 Sensor 2
**********
P1147,Heated O2 Sensor 2
**********
P1167,Heated O2 Sensor 2

Last edited by Andrei; 04-24-2012 at 01:54 PM.
Old 04-24-2012, 04:40 PM
  #97  
djamps
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
djamps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: MD
Posts: 4,492
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Andrei
Not using non-foulers throws a SES light on my car.
This is to be expected. You have to delete the P04x0 codes. If you are throwing other codes with all sensors in the exaust stream then you have another issues like exhaust/vacuum leaks, bad tuning, ect.

Last edited by djamps; 04-24-2012 at 04:43 PM.
Old 04-24-2012, 04:54 PM
  #98  
F2CMaDMaXX
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
F2CMaDMaXX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Oregon from England
Posts: 1,751
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Yeah i think you're barking up the wrong tree here, you're expecting something no one else even expects.
Old 04-24-2012, 07:48 PM
  #99  
Andrei
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Andrei's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Planet Kolob
Posts: 1,251
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by djamps
This is to be expected. You have to delete the P04x0 codes. If you are throwing other codes with all sensors in the exaust stream then you have another issues like exhaust/vacuum leaks, bad tuning, ect.
It doesn't throw other codes when the sensors are directly in besides that one for each sensor and it runs shitty, and it throws no codes when they are in with the straight non-foulers but still runs shitty. Throws 1273 and 1283 for AF sensors with 90 degree non-foulers even though those have not been touched.

And any car that is not a Revup will have this issue, all the way up to the 07 automatic G35 coupe. Any one who doesn't have a Revup and who have test pipes and use straight non-foulers have this issue and don't know it because there is no codes. They just think it runs normal when it actually doesn't because they don't know the difference. I do.

Last edited by Andrei; 04-24-2012 at 08:00 PM.
Old 04-24-2012, 07:53 PM
  #100  
F2CMaDMaXX
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
F2CMaDMaXX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Oregon from England
Posts: 1,751
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

That's the whole point, it's what he's saying, those codes are because it detects gasses consistent with there being no cats.


Quick Reply: Rear O2 function and input



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:17 PM.