eTune by Vince@RTtuning
#1
eTune by Vince@RTtuning
After using my Nismo S-Tune exhaust for about a year, I had been saving up for an Injen CAI and a tune as my next mods. It's personal preference, but I didn't want to install the intake without a tune. From this forum, RT Tuning had high marks and decided to work with them on the tuning. The tuning software I used was Osiris Standard, since there's no local certified tuner on my island (Big Island).
I worked with Vince through emails and needed only one iteration to complete the tuning.
I don't have dyno runs/charts, however I was able to plot my AFR's from Vince's Version 1 eTune (base tune) vs. Version 2 tune.
Car: 2008 Nismo 350Z
Mods:Nismo S-Tune Exhaust, Injen CAI.
Stock Cats
I realize I suck at Excel.
Anyways, from my readings here in the forums, Vince will try to get the AFR's in the 12.6 - 12.8 range. Also it was mentioned AFR's over 13.5 showed signs of detonation. While I don't have log of a stock run, I can only imagine how lean I must have been running.
Performance wise, I do feel like the car has better pickup/torque in the lower RPM's and less resistance-feeling in the high RPM's.
While I'm still working with Vince on some minor things, I'd definitely recommend them for etuning, for anyone that's in a similar situation as me. They've been pretty patient and tolerant of my pestering.
I did have a chance to speak with Vince over the phone once and he really is an interesting person to talk to. I recall learning some interesting info on the tuning capabilities.
EDIT:
Below are the dyno results. The graph shows: Stock Tune, Version 1 Tune, and Version 3 Tune. Apparently I wasn't running lean, but rich with stock tune.
I worked with Vince through emails and needed only one iteration to complete the tuning.
I don't have dyno runs/charts, however I was able to plot my AFR's from Vince's Version 1 eTune (base tune) vs. Version 2 tune.
Car: 2008 Nismo 350Z
Mods:Nismo S-Tune Exhaust, Injen CAI.
Stock Cats
I realize I suck at Excel.
Anyways, from my readings here in the forums, Vince will try to get the AFR's in the 12.6 - 12.8 range. Also it was mentioned AFR's over 13.5 showed signs of detonation. While I don't have log of a stock run, I can only imagine how lean I must have been running.
Performance wise, I do feel like the car has better pickup/torque in the lower RPM's and less resistance-feeling in the high RPM's.
While I'm still working with Vince on some minor things, I'd definitely recommend them for etuning, for anyone that's in a similar situation as me. They've been pretty patient and tolerant of my pestering.
I did have a chance to speak with Vince over the phone once and he really is an interesting person to talk to. I recall learning some interesting info on the tuning capabilities.
EDIT:
Below are the dyno results. The graph shows: Stock Tune, Version 1 Tune, and Version 3 Tune. Apparently I wasn't running lean, but rich with stock tune.
Last edited by musubi; 10-18-2012 at 04:09 PM.
#6
#7
I says on there that it does support UPREV datalogs. Give it a shot, what is mostly needs is TPS, RPM and Load to make the charts.
I adjusted the datalog that Haltech so it could be read with the VD when I was tuning in a country that does not have a AWD dyno available.
Trending Topics
#8
Bud,a Nismo catback and you are planning on buying a CAI...you are going through
all these calls/discussions on a tune.What are you expecting?
Hate to burst your bubble but these are everyday bolt ons that you may get another
10hp if you are lucky.
all these calls/discussions on a tune.What are you expecting?
Hate to burst your bubble but these are everyday bolt ons that you may get another
10hp if you are lucky.
#9
El Verdugo, I did check out the program (downloaded it and ran it). While is does support UpRev's logs, it doesn't have 350Z as a pre-set vehicle and I'm unable to set up a profile.
EDIT:
From my readings, it seems Virtual Dyno graphs can be somewhat accurate to what real dynos put out (under similar/constant conditions), however for my purposes, it's really not applicable and I'd rather not post deceiving information. Graph deleted.
EDIT:
From my readings, it seems Virtual Dyno graphs can be somewhat accurate to what real dynos put out (under similar/constant conditions), however for my purposes, it's really not applicable and I'd rather not post deceiving information. Graph deleted.
Last edited by musubi; 10-11-2012 at 12:40 AM.
#10
True, as I mentioned it was personal preference. With the tune, I was expecting to run at a more appropriate AFR and achieve WOT throughout the RPM range, along with other items Vince adjusted. I wasn't expecting anything too significant. Bubble is not burst.
#12
#15
Added my dyno charts to my first post.
Overall, I'm glad the car was tuned to run healthier. Gained a couple HP. The dyno was done on a DynoJet 248. I was hoping for a higher HP number (I guess we all do), but at least I didn't lose power.
Was it worth it? If the tune enables my car to run at safer AFR, timing, etc. levels with the mods, then yes.
Overall, I'm glad the car was tuned to run healthier. Gained a couple HP. The dyno was done on a DynoJet 248. I was hoping for a higher HP number (I guess we all do), but at least I didn't lose power.
Was it worth it? If the tune enables my car to run at safer AFR, timing, etc. levels with the mods, then yes.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post