350z vs IS-F vs M3 vs S2000
03-11-2008, 01:31 PM
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: WA
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
350z vs IS-F vs M3 vs S2000
03-11-2008, 01:58 PM
#3
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: south florida
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i think it was fairly obvious the entire race that the m3 was the faster ride.
The IS-F disappointed me
Was the honda there just to film the backside of the other cars? What a waste of gas and lets not forget a bad impact on the environment.
The IS-F disappointed me
Was the honda there just to film the backside of the other cars? What a waste of gas and lets not forget a bad impact on the environment.
03-11-2008, 02:03 PM
#5
Originally Posted by Get_Zwole
Z did alot better then i thought against the m3 Def. happy to see that nice vid.
03-11-2008, 02:08 PM
#7
Originally Posted by lilaznxboi08
lol im happy with 2nd place, since our Zs are racing much faster cars.
Trending Topics
03-11-2008, 02:24 PM
#10
F U StuLax18
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: H-Town
Posts: 7,419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Firebase99
According to the vid its now ALLEGEDLY MUCH faster cars...Im not sure I'm buying into this vid...dont get me wrong I LOVE my Z but the M3 BARELY edged it out. And I thought an s2000 would run better not to mention the IS-F.
03-11-2008, 03:29 PM
#16
Registered User
iTrader: (34)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: oklahoma city
Posts: 7,908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Firebase99
No kidding. Considering the M3 is sporting a 414HP 8 cylinder engine...good Lord thats embarrassing for BMW and its $65,000 price tag. Unless the Bimmer was just playing with the Z the whole time?
03-11-2008, 03:41 PM
#17
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: .
Posts: 2,071
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Firebase99
No kidding. Considering the M3 is sporting a 414HP 8 cylinder engine...good Lord thats embarrassing for BMW and its $65,000 price tag. Unless the Bimmer was just playing with the Z the whole time?
I said 56,000 because thats the base price. The M3 could have done better. The launch on the Z was just insane.
.
03-11-2008, 03:50 PM
#18
Originally Posted by skaterbasist
Wow, I always laugh at this mentality. You think people spend $56,000 on a BMW M3 just for performance? The price tag is high. But you don't just get performance on a car like the M3. That's one reason why the M3 and Nismo Z are in a different league and price range.
I said 56,000 because thats the base price. The M3 could have done better. The launch on the Z was just insane.
.
I said 56,000 because thats the base price. The M3 could have done better. The launch on the Z was just insane.
.
03-11-2008, 03:51 PM
#19
Originally Posted by Firebase99
No kidding. Considering the M3 is sporting a 414HP 8 cylinder engine...good Lord thats embarrassing for BMW and its $65,000 price tag. Unless the Bimmer was just playing with the Z the whole time?
Whoa whoa whoa. The new M3 comes with that much power? If so, I am VERY happy to see the Z be so close to it (ofcourse, I would've been happier to see it win
)
03-11-2008, 03:53 PM
#20
Originally Posted by skaterbasist
Wow, I always laugh at this mentality. You think people spend $56,000 on a BMW M3 just for performance? The price tag is high. But you don't just get performance on a car like the M3. That's one reason why the M3 and Nismo Z are in a different league and price range.
I said 56,000 because thats the base price. The M3 could have done better. The launch on the Z was just insane.
.
I said 56,000 because thats the base price. The M3 could have done better. The launch on the Z was just insane.
.
Strip all that stuff aside, apparently the M3 makes over 400 bhp. It should've been able to SKUNK the other cars including the Z.
If the specs on the M3 are accurate to what has been said on this thread, the M3= Pathetic and yes, anyone that does buy an M car does have a performance-oriented mind set.