Notices
VQ35HR Mods and Support related to the 2007/08 High Revving VQ

290.16rwhp/257.48tq

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 07:57 AM
  #21  
Peak350's Avatar
Peak350
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,844
Likes: 0
From: DeLand, Florida
Default

The thing I notice (something I noticed driving as well) is how flat the torque is until 6,000 RPM's, where it starts to fall off. Whenever a new intake manifold is released that should really help shift the power up to higher revs (where you stay on a track) and give the car that much more power...
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 10:06 AM
  #22  
PM-Performance's Avatar
PM-Performance
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
From: Land of the Imigrants, PA
Default

I agree after like 6k, the car does not impress me too much. Feels like it runs out of steam up top. I normally dont even take it that high. No real need. but when I do, its kinda bleh.
Below 6K though the thing feels pretty damn good.

What are all the mods again? I think its pretty safe to say the HR takes very well to mods.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 05:38 PM
  #23  
T_K's Avatar
T_K
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 870
Likes: 3
From: Chicago
Default

Could be the cams aren't breathing that well up top too. IIRC the cam lift/duration for the HR is the same as the Rev-Up VQ, except 4 degrees advanced. No way to know for sure yet.

TK
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 06:01 PM
  #24  
Peak350's Avatar
Peak350
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,844
Likes: 0
From: DeLand, Florida
Default

Right, but the 3.7HR has a longer runner length on the intake manifold which would account for more top end. I'd expect a similar manifold on the 3.5 would move some power. The car in no way falls over, it just doesn't have quite the umph. Still faster to redline it than to shortshift, and flat torque curve is great for low-speed cornering/exits.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2008 | 12:16 PM
  #25  
itsjiggajames's Avatar
itsjiggajames
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
From: IE - LA- Cali
Default

did you guys lean out after installing intakes or test pipes?
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2008 | 12:44 PM
  #26  
Gooey's Avatar
Gooey
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,057
Likes: 0
From: MD
Default

intakes made my car dirty lean. Takin it out. Well the A/F chart explains it. That is with test pipes and exhaust.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2008 | 12:54 PM
  #27  
ACEMAN's Avatar
ACEMAN
Master
Premier Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,774
Likes: 2
From: Hagerstown MD
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by Gooey
intakes made my car dirty lean. Takin it out. Well the A/F chart explains it. That is with test pipes and exhaust.
Hey Jon,

Here is the Overlay thread i started with our two cars.

Man that engine pulls hard up top

https://my350z.com/forum/engine-and-drivetrain/328813-dyno-overlay-of-a-07-and-03-same-day-same-dyno.html

Nice numbers

Todd
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2008 | 01:22 PM
  #28  
warmmilk's Avatar
warmmilk
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 1
From: Seattle (area), WA
Default

Originally Posted by Peak350
The thing I notice (something I noticed driving as well) is how flat the torque is until 6,000 RPM's, where it starts to fall off. Whenever a new intake manifold is released that should really help shift the power up to higher revs (where you stay on a track) and give the car that much more power...
if u want more power up top, then get a big (2.75+) diameter true dual exhaust

here is a dyno of a stock run, w/ greddy evo TT (2.75" TD), and w/ greddy evo TT and test pipes:

https://my350z.com/forum/showpost.ph...1&postcount=51

notice that the exhaust started picking up power a hair under 6k being equal every where else to stock, then the added test pipes added power everywhere else. all of the other exhausts *that i've seen* (not every other exhaust in the world) pick up good power over stock from the low end up to about 6k, then they more or less match the stock power from 6k to redline. so from my observation, if u want power up top, get a big exhaust, if u want power low to mid, without losing what u already have up top, get a normal sized exhaust.

if u wanna get really wild, u can put a cut out valve on ur exhaust and have it open at 5.5-6k rpm, and get a normal size exhaust. then u'll have the best of both worlds. but i imagine this would be a pain to set up
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2008 | 09:13 AM
  #29  
JOEGYVER's Avatar
JOEGYVER
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
From: Lexington, SC
Default

Nice numbers, sort of off topic, but are the MAF housing a different diameter causing the A/F leaning out?
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2008 | 12:18 AM
  #30  
VeeTec's Avatar
VeeTec
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 0
From: Jackson County, GA
Default

Originally Posted by urban350z
I had mine dynoed on Saturday as well.. it was at a shop outside atlanta..
My numbers weren't quite as high but close.. I did not have them do an A/F reading since my car is bone stock at the moment.. and didn't think that it would make a difference..
276.36 rwhp, 257.08 rwtq

What shop? I plan on dynoing at Dynolab, in Marietta.

Edit: NM, I see it was in Oxford. I may go down there, as it's closer.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2008 | 03:25 AM
  #31  
Datona Jess's Avatar
Datona Jess
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,078
Likes: 0
From: Novi, Michigan
Default

Very nice numbers!
I may have to throw mine on a Dyno once I am done putting the mods on it once it is broken in.
Very inspiring....
I would love to see what you run in 1/4 with those Gears
That thing must FLY
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2008 | 03:45 AM
  #32  
Riley07's Avatar
Riley07
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Default

After seeing your A/F I'm taking my intakes out until some tuning options are available...
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2008 | 10:59 AM
  #33  
gabez33's Avatar
gabez33
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,035
Likes: 1
From: SATX
Default

Originally Posted by Peak350
Right, but the 3.7HR has a longer runner length on the intake manifold which would account for more top end. I'd expect a similar manifold on the 3.5 would move some power. The car in no way falls over, it just doesn't have quite the umph. Still faster to redline it than to shortshift, and flat torque curve is great for low-speed cornering/exits.
I thought longer runners would account for more tq on the intake manifold?? Iam a bit lost
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2008 | 11:26 AM
  #34  
Peak350's Avatar
Peak350
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,844
Likes: 0
From: DeLand, Florida
Default

Originally Posted by gabez33
I thought longer runners would account for more tq on the intake manifold?? Iam a bit lost
I could be making a mistake here.

Thinking about it more logically, a longer runner resonates at a lower frequency (given same diameter) so it would flow better at a lower RPM. So maybe I've had it backwards in my head this whole time .

I need to read up on plenum design a lot more.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2008 | 01:52 PM
  #35  
powermark's Avatar
powermark
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 381
Likes: 1
From: Oceanside, CA
Default

STD will yield higher numbers then sae

I'm looking for about 290 whp sae correected when I get test pipes soon
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2008 | 02:05 PM
  #36  
T_K's Avatar
T_K
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 870
Likes: 3
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by gabez33
I thought longer runners would account for more tq on the intake manifold?? Iam a bit lost
When it comes to runners you have to think in 3 dimensions. One car may have "longer" runners physically, but also have to take into account the actual cross section of the runner, and the internal area of the manifold. In theory, longer runners will provide more torque down low compared to shorter runners, if the internal area, or volume, of the 2 runner types including their collectors is the same.

TK
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2008 | 03:24 PM
  #37  
gabez33's Avatar
gabez33
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,035
Likes: 1
From: SATX
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by T_K
When it comes to runners you have to think in 3 dimensions. One car may have "longer" runners physically, but also have to take into account the actual cross section of the runner, and the internal area of the manifold. In theory, longer runners will provide more torque down low compared to shorter runners, if the internal area, or volume, of the 2 runner types including their collectors is the same.

TK
Ok, nice explanation. I never stop learning on this site
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2008 | 03:29 PM
  #38  
gabez33's Avatar
gabez33
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,035
Likes: 1
From: SATX
Default

Originally Posted by Peak350
I could be making a mistake here.

Thinking about it more logically, a longer runner resonates at a lower frequency (given same diameter) so it would flow better at a lower RPM. So maybe I've had it backwards in my head this whole time .

I need to read up on plenum design a lot more.
HAhaha, you and me both man. I know theres allot to it, but once you start grasping the concepts it gets very intresting
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2008 | 03:30 PM
  #39  
baspence's Avatar
baspence
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
From: From NC to VA to TN
Default

damn damn, I wanna get my dynoed soon. I'm trying to wait on the reflash though cause I wanna see what I'm making all said and done and see the a/f ratio then. I'm gonna leave the cat's (I think) but then I'll have the dual popchargers and the AAM 3" single, AAM y pipe and reflash
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2008 | 05:37 PM
  #40  
T_K's Avatar
T_K
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 870
Likes: 3
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by gabez33
Ok, nice explanation. I never stop learning on this site
I think thats the basics, I could be wrong about a few points. I'm not 100% sure if the volume of the collector has to be included too. It might just be the cross sectional area of the runners needing to be equal.

TK
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:22 PM.